The Comparison of the Effects between Continuous and Intermittent Energy Restriction in Short-Term Bodyweight Loss for Sedentary Population: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

Objective: To compare the effects of continuous energy restriction (CER) and intermittent energy restriction (IER) in bodyweight loss plan in sedentary individuals with normal bodyweight and explore the influence factors of effect and individual retention. Methods: 26 participants were recruited in...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Manwen Xu, Ji Li, Yan Zou, Yining Xu
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	continuous energy restriction intermittent energy restriction bodyweight loss plan diet intervention RCT Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/3de146c9c490477b984a87c446332521
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:3de146c9c490477b984a87c446332521
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:3de146c9c490477b984a87c4463325212021-11-11T16:44:42ZThe Comparison of the Effects between Continuous and Intermittent Energy Restriction in Short-Term Bodyweight Loss for Sedentary Population: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial10.3390/ijerph1821116451660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/3de146c9c490477b984a87c4463325212021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11645https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Objective: To compare the effects of continuous energy restriction (CER) and intermittent energy restriction (IER) in bodyweight loss plan in sedentary individuals with normal bodyweight and explore the influence factors of effect and individual retention. Methods: 26 participants were recruited in this randomized controlled and double-blinded trial and allocated to CER and IER groups. Bodyweight (BW), body mass index (BMI), and resting metabolic rate (RMR) would be collected before and after a 4-week (28 days) plan which included energy restriction (CER or IER) and moderate-intensity exercise. Daily intake of three major nutrients (protein, carbohydrate, fat) and calories were recorded. Results: A significant decrease in BW and BMI were reported within each group. No statistically significant difference in the change of RMR in CERG. No statistically significant difference was reported in the effect between groups, neither as well the intake of total calories, three major nutrients, and individual plan retention. The influence factors of IER and CER are different. Conclusion: Both CER and IER are effective and safe energy restriction strategies in the short term. Daily energy intake and physical exercise are important to both IER and CER.Manwen XuJi LiYan ZouYining XuMDPI AGarticlecontinuous energy restrictionintermittent energy restrictionbodyweight loss plandiet interventionRCTMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11645, p 11645 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	continuous energy restriction intermittent energy restriction bodyweight loss plan diet intervention RCT Medicine R
spellingShingle	continuous energy restriction intermittent energy restriction bodyweight loss plan diet intervention RCT Medicine R Manwen Xu Ji Li Yan Zou Yining Xu The Comparison of the Effects between Continuous and Intermittent Energy Restriction in Short-Term Bodyweight Loss for Sedentary Population: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
description	Objective: To compare the effects of continuous energy restriction (CER) and intermittent energy restriction (IER) in bodyweight loss plan in sedentary individuals with normal bodyweight and explore the influence factors of effect and individual retention. Methods: 26 participants were recruited in this randomized controlled and double-blinded trial and allocated to CER and IER groups. Bodyweight (BW), body mass index (BMI), and resting metabolic rate (RMR) would be collected before and after a 4-week (28 days) plan which included energy restriction (CER or IER) and moderate-intensity exercise. Daily intake of three major nutrients (protein, carbohydrate, fat) and calories were recorded. Results: A significant decrease in BW and BMI were reported within each group. No statistically significant difference in the change of RMR in CERG. No statistically significant difference was reported in the effect between groups, neither as well the intake of total calories, three major nutrients, and individual plan retention. The influence factors of IER and CER are different. Conclusion: Both CER and IER are effective and safe energy restriction strategies in the short term. Daily energy intake and physical exercise are important to both IER and CER.
format	article
author	Manwen Xu Ji Li Yan Zou Yining Xu
author_facet	Manwen Xu Ji Li Yan Zou Yining Xu
author_sort	Manwen Xu
title	The Comparison of the Effects between Continuous and Intermittent Energy Restriction in Short-Term Bodyweight Loss for Sedentary Population: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
title_short	The Comparison of the Effects between Continuous and Intermittent Energy Restriction in Short-Term Bodyweight Loss for Sedentary Population: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
title_full	The Comparison of the Effects between Continuous and Intermittent Energy Restriction in Short-Term Bodyweight Loss for Sedentary Population: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
title_fullStr	The Comparison of the Effects between Continuous and Intermittent Energy Restriction in Short-Term Bodyweight Loss for Sedentary Population: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed	The Comparison of the Effects between Continuous and Intermittent Energy Restriction in Short-Term Bodyweight Loss for Sedentary Population: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial
title_sort	comparison of the effects between continuous and intermittent energy restriction in short-term bodyweight loss for sedentary population: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/3de146c9c490477b984a87c446332521
work_keys_str_mv	AT manwenxu thecomparisonoftheeffectsbetweencontinuousandintermittentenergyrestrictioninshorttermbodyweightlossforsedentarypopulationarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT jili thecomparisonoftheeffectsbetweencontinuousandintermittentenergyrestrictioninshorttermbodyweightlossforsedentarypopulationarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT yanzou thecomparisonoftheeffectsbetweencontinuousandintermittentenergyrestrictioninshorttermbodyweightlossforsedentarypopulationarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT yiningxu thecomparisonoftheeffectsbetweencontinuousandintermittentenergyrestrictioninshorttermbodyweightlossforsedentarypopulationarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT manwenxu comparisonoftheeffectsbetweencontinuousandintermittentenergyrestrictioninshorttermbodyweightlossforsedentarypopulationarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT jili comparisonoftheeffectsbetweencontinuousandintermittentenergyrestrictioninshorttermbodyweightlossforsedentarypopulationarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT yanzou comparisonoftheeffectsbetweencontinuousandintermittentenergyrestrictioninshorttermbodyweightlossforsedentarypopulationarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial AT yiningxu comparisonoftheeffectsbetweencontinuousandintermittentenergyrestrictioninshorttermbodyweightlossforsedentarypopulationarandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledtrial
_version_	1718432233822355456

The Comparison of the Effects between Continuous and Intermittent Energy Restriction in Short-Term Bodyweight Loss for Sedentary Population: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

Ejemplares similares