Experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation

Abstract Reputation-based cooperation is often observed in modern society. People gain several types of information by assessing others. Among these, the most important information is the actions of people and those of their recipients. However, almost all studies assume that people consider all of...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Isamu Okada, Hitoshi Yamamoto, Yoshiki Sato, Satoshi Uchida, Tatsuya Sasaki
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2018
Materias:	Reputation-based Cooperation Selective Inattention Indirect Reciprocity Assessment Rules Information Disclosure Behavior Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/3e0a2d272bd94aee95423555bb7e3b86
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:3e0a2d272bd94aee95423555bb7e3b86
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:3e0a2d272bd94aee95423555bb7e3b862021-12-02T11:41:25ZExperimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation10.1038/s41598-018-33147-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/3e0a2d272bd94aee95423555bb7e3b862018-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33147-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Reputation-based cooperation is often observed in modern society. People gain several types of information by assessing others. Among these, the most important information is the actions of people and those of their recipients. However, almost all studies assume that people consider all of the information they receive. This assumption is extreme, and people engaging in reputation-based cooperation may not pay attention to some information, i.e., they may display selective inattention. We demonstrate that subjects’ decision-making in relation to cooperative action depends on the content of the information they receive about their recipients. Our results show that subjects either consider or ignore information depending on the content of that information. When their recipients had cooperated previously, subjects cooperated without considering the information they received. When the recipients had played before with those who had bad reputations, subjects did not use that information, regardless of whether it was disclosed proactively. In other cases, subjects considered information on both the previous actions of recipients and those of the recipients’ own recipients. We found that subjects did not always use the information to make decisions, although they willingly received information about their recipients. This supports the proposition that selective inattention occurs in reputation-based cooperation.Isamu OkadaHitoshi YamamotoYoshiki SatoSatoshi UchidaTatsuya SasakiNature PortfolioarticleReputation-based CooperationSelective InattentionIndirect ReciprocityAssessment RulesInformation Disclosure BehaviorMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 8, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Reputation-based Cooperation Selective Inattention Indirect Reciprocity Assessment Rules Information Disclosure Behavior Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Reputation-based Cooperation Selective Inattention Indirect Reciprocity Assessment Rules Information Disclosure Behavior Medicine R Science Q Isamu Okada Hitoshi Yamamoto Yoshiki Sato Satoshi Uchida Tatsuya Sasaki Experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation
description	Abstract Reputation-based cooperation is often observed in modern society. People gain several types of information by assessing others. Among these, the most important information is the actions of people and those of their recipients. However, almost all studies assume that people consider all of the information they receive. This assumption is extreme, and people engaging in reputation-based cooperation may not pay attention to some information, i.e., they may display selective inattention. We demonstrate that subjects’ decision-making in relation to cooperative action depends on the content of the information they receive about their recipients. Our results show that subjects either consider or ignore information depending on the content of that information. When their recipients had cooperated previously, subjects cooperated without considering the information they received. When the recipients had played before with those who had bad reputations, subjects did not use that information, regardless of whether it was disclosed proactively. In other cases, subjects considered information on both the previous actions of recipients and those of the recipients’ own recipients. We found that subjects did not always use the information to make decisions, although they willingly received information about their recipients. This supports the proposition that selective inattention occurs in reputation-based cooperation.
format	article
author	Isamu Okada Hitoshi Yamamoto Yoshiki Sato Satoshi Uchida Tatsuya Sasaki
author_facet	Isamu Okada Hitoshi Yamamoto Yoshiki Sato Satoshi Uchida Tatsuya Sasaki
author_sort	Isamu Okada
title	Experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation
title_short	Experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation
title_full	Experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation
title_fullStr	Experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation
title_full_unstemmed	Experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation
title_sort	experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/3e0a2d272bd94aee95423555bb7e3b86
work_keys_str_mv	AT isamuokada experimentalevidenceofselectiveinattentioninreputationbasedcooperation AT hitoshiyamamoto experimentalevidenceofselectiveinattentioninreputationbasedcooperation AT yoshikisato experimentalevidenceofselectiveinattentioninreputationbasedcooperation AT satoshiuchida experimentalevidenceofselectiveinattentioninreputationbasedcooperation AT tatsuyasasaki experimentalevidenceofselectiveinattentioninreputationbasedcooperation
_version_	1718395393988886528

Experimental evidence of selective inattention in reputation-based cooperation

Ejemplares similares