Deep Learning Classification of Lake Zooplankton
Plankton are effective indicators of environmental change and ecosystem health in freshwater habitats, but collection of plankton data using manual microscopic methods is extremely labor-intensive and expensive. Automated plankton imaging offers a promising way forward to monitor plankton communitie...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3e20fa8149824e41b8e6f4721ec9e236 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:3e20fa8149824e41b8e6f4721ec9e236 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:3e20fa8149824e41b8e6f4721ec9e2362021-11-15T05:53:23ZDeep Learning Classification of Lake Zooplankton1664-302X10.3389/fmicb.2021.746297https://doaj.org/article/3e20fa8149824e41b8e6f4721ec9e2362021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.746297/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-302XPlankton are effective indicators of environmental change and ecosystem health in freshwater habitats, but collection of plankton data using manual microscopic methods is extremely labor-intensive and expensive. Automated plankton imaging offers a promising way forward to monitor plankton communities with high frequency and accuracy in real-time. Yet, manual annotation of millions of images proposes a serious challenge to taxonomists. Deep learning classifiers have been successfully applied in various fields and provided encouraging results when used to categorize marine plankton images. Here, we present a set of deep learning models developed for the identification of lake plankton, and study several strategies to obtain optimal performances, which lead to operational prescriptions for users. To this aim, we annotated into 35 classes over 17900 images of zooplankton and large phytoplankton colonies, detected in Lake Greifensee (Switzerland) with the Dual Scripps Plankton Camera. Our best models were based on transfer learning and ensembling, which classified plankton images with 98% accuracy and 93% F1 score. When tested on freely available plankton datasets produced by other automated imaging tools (ZooScan, Imaging FlowCytobot, and ISIIS), our models performed better than previously used models. Our annotated data, code and classification models are freely available online.Sreenath P. KyathanahallyThomas HardemanEwa MerzThea BulasMarta ReyesPeter IslesFrancesco PomatiMarco Baity-JesiFrontiers Media S.A.articleplankton cameradeep learningplankton classificationtransfer learningGreifenseeensemble learningMicrobiologyQR1-502ENFrontiers in Microbiology, Vol 12 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
plankton camera deep learning plankton classification transfer learning Greifensee ensemble learning Microbiology QR1-502 |
spellingShingle |
plankton camera deep learning plankton classification transfer learning Greifensee ensemble learning Microbiology QR1-502 Sreenath P. Kyathanahally Thomas Hardeman Ewa Merz Thea Bulas Marta Reyes Peter Isles Francesco Pomati Marco Baity-Jesi Deep Learning Classification of Lake Zooplankton |
description |
Plankton are effective indicators of environmental change and ecosystem health in freshwater habitats, but collection of plankton data using manual microscopic methods is extremely labor-intensive and expensive. Automated plankton imaging offers a promising way forward to monitor plankton communities with high frequency and accuracy in real-time. Yet, manual annotation of millions of images proposes a serious challenge to taxonomists. Deep learning classifiers have been successfully applied in various fields and provided encouraging results when used to categorize marine plankton images. Here, we present a set of deep learning models developed for the identification of lake plankton, and study several strategies to obtain optimal performances, which lead to operational prescriptions for users. To this aim, we annotated into 35 classes over 17900 images of zooplankton and large phytoplankton colonies, detected in Lake Greifensee (Switzerland) with the Dual Scripps Plankton Camera. Our best models were based on transfer learning and ensembling, which classified plankton images with 98% accuracy and 93% F1 score. When tested on freely available plankton datasets produced by other automated imaging tools (ZooScan, Imaging FlowCytobot, and ISIIS), our models performed better than previously used models. Our annotated data, code and classification models are freely available online. |
format |
article |
author |
Sreenath P. Kyathanahally Thomas Hardeman Ewa Merz Thea Bulas Marta Reyes Peter Isles Francesco Pomati Marco Baity-Jesi |
author_facet |
Sreenath P. Kyathanahally Thomas Hardeman Ewa Merz Thea Bulas Marta Reyes Peter Isles Francesco Pomati Marco Baity-Jesi |
author_sort |
Sreenath P. Kyathanahally |
title |
Deep Learning Classification of Lake Zooplankton |
title_short |
Deep Learning Classification of Lake Zooplankton |
title_full |
Deep Learning Classification of Lake Zooplankton |
title_fullStr |
Deep Learning Classification of Lake Zooplankton |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deep Learning Classification of Lake Zooplankton |
title_sort |
deep learning classification of lake zooplankton |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/3e20fa8149824e41b8e6f4721ec9e236 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sreenathpkyathanahally deeplearningclassificationoflakezooplankton AT thomashardeman deeplearningclassificationoflakezooplankton AT ewamerz deeplearningclassificationoflakezooplankton AT theabulas deeplearningclassificationoflakezooplankton AT martareyes deeplearningclassificationoflakezooplankton AT peterisles deeplearningclassificationoflakezooplankton AT francescopomati deeplearningclassificationoflakezooplankton AT marcobaityjesi deeplearningclassificationoflakezooplankton |
_version_ |
1718428546117926912 |