Risk management in Iraqi Oil Field Kurdistan Regional Government Case study (Upstream)

The investment decision-maker in oil exploration projects faces overlap in the main criteria, sub-criteria, and attributes of the reasons that control the investment decision, which requires a mechanism that identifies and measures risks in terms of quantity and quality for all alternatives under st...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Alhiti Kanaan M. Abdlkareem, Mohammed Amjed Abdulqadir
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR
Publicado:	EDP Sciences 2021
Materias:	ahp method topsis method dm risk management Environmental sciences GE1-350
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/3e46ff1808ff4f6a9b32b3365e8cf444
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:3e46ff1808ff4f6a9b32b3365e8cf444
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:3e46ff1808ff4f6a9b32b3365e8cf4442021-11-12T11:43:50ZRisk management in Iraqi Oil Field Kurdistan Regional Government Case study (Upstream)2267-124210.1051/e3sconf/202131802004https://doaj.org/article/3e46ff1808ff4f6a9b32b3365e8cf4442021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/94/e3sconf_icge2021_02004.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2267-1242The investment decision-maker in oil exploration projects faces overlap in the main criteria, sub-criteria, and attributes of the reasons that control the investment decision, which requires a mechanism that identifies and measures risks in terms of quantity and quality for all alternatives under study. Having a mechanism that deals with such cases will help the decision-maker choose the best alternative by measuring risks and giving the best solution. The main objective of this study is to transfer the uncertainty resulting from the difference in the criteria and features of the problem under investigation into a mechanism that integrates both the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to choose the optimal solution. The researchers used each (TOPSIS) and APH combined with choosing alternatives by defining criteria, sub-criteria, and oil exploration attributes. Risk management in oil exploration in the Kurdistan region was the subject of this research, which concluded that Erbil blocks' investment is better than the rest of the region. This methodology will act as a guide to help the decision-maker find the best alternative by using both techniques in finding the best investment decision.Alhiti Kanaan M. AbdlkareemMohammed Amjed AbdulqadirEDP Sciencesarticleahp methodtopsis methoddmrisk managementEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350ENFRE3S Web of Conferences, Vol 318, p 02004 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR
topic	ahp method topsis method dm risk management Environmental sciences GE1-350
spellingShingle	ahp method topsis method dm risk management Environmental sciences GE1-350 Alhiti Kanaan M. Abdlkareem Mohammed Amjed Abdulqadir Risk management in Iraqi Oil Field Kurdistan Regional Government Case study (Upstream)
description	The investment decision-maker in oil exploration projects faces overlap in the main criteria, sub-criteria, and attributes of the reasons that control the investment decision, which requires a mechanism that identifies and measures risks in terms of quantity and quality for all alternatives under study. Having a mechanism that deals with such cases will help the decision-maker choose the best alternative by measuring risks and giving the best solution. The main objective of this study is to transfer the uncertainty resulting from the difference in the criteria and features of the problem under investigation into a mechanism that integrates both the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to choose the optimal solution. The researchers used each (TOPSIS) and APH combined with choosing alternatives by defining criteria, sub-criteria, and oil exploration attributes. Risk management in oil exploration in the Kurdistan region was the subject of this research, which concluded that Erbil blocks' investment is better than the rest of the region. This methodology will act as a guide to help the decision-maker find the best alternative by using both techniques in finding the best investment decision.
format	article
author	Alhiti Kanaan M. Abdlkareem Mohammed Amjed Abdulqadir
author_facet	Alhiti Kanaan M. Abdlkareem Mohammed Amjed Abdulqadir
author_sort	Alhiti Kanaan M. Abdlkareem
title	Risk management in Iraqi Oil Field Kurdistan Regional Government Case study (Upstream)
title_short	Risk management in Iraqi Oil Field Kurdistan Regional Government Case study (Upstream)
title_full	Risk management in Iraqi Oil Field Kurdistan Regional Government Case study (Upstream)
title_fullStr	Risk management in Iraqi Oil Field Kurdistan Regional Government Case study (Upstream)
title_full_unstemmed	Risk management in Iraqi Oil Field Kurdistan Regional Government Case study (Upstream)
title_sort	risk management in iraqi oil field kurdistan regional government case study (upstream)
publisher	EDP Sciences
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/3e46ff1808ff4f6a9b32b3365e8cf444
work_keys_str_mv	AT alhitikanaanmabdlkareem riskmanagementiniraqioilfieldkurdistanregionalgovernmentcasestudyupstream AT mohammedamjedabdulqadir riskmanagementiniraqioilfieldkurdistanregionalgovernmentcasestudyupstream
_version_	1718430612186988544

Risk management in Iraqi Oil Field Kurdistan Regional Government Case study (Upstream)

Ejemplares similares