The Degrees of Understanding and the Inferential Component of Understanding

Current debates on the nature of explanatory understanding have converged on the idea that at least one of the core components of understanding is inferential. Philosophers have characterized the inferential dimension of understanding as consisting of several related cognitive abilities to grasp a g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stefan Petkov
Format: article
Language:CS
EN
SK
Published: Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28401
https://doaj.org/article/3e946dd271ff42f694b89cfb2fbcb741
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3e946dd271ff42f694b89cfb2fbcb741
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3e946dd271ff42f694b89cfb2fbcb7412021-12-02T17:39:50ZThe Degrees of Understanding and the Inferential Component of Understandinghttps://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.284011335-06682585-7150https://doaj.org/article/3e946dd271ff42f694b89cfb2fbcb7412021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/11292200orgf.2021.28401.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/1335-0668https://doaj.org/toc/2585-7150Current debates on the nature of explanatory understanding have converged on the idea that at least one of the core components of understanding is inferential. Philosophers have characterized the inferential dimension of understanding as consisting of several related cognitive abilities to grasp a given explanation and the nexus of complementing explanations to which it belongs. Whilst analyses of both the subjective epistemic abilities related to grasping and objective features of the inferential links within explanations have received much attention, both within theories of explanation and in the literature on understanding, the criteria for evaluating the specific structure and organization of explanatory clusters or nexuses have received much less attention. Nevertheless, two notable exceptions stand out—Khalifa’s characterization of an explanatory nexus and theories of explanatory unification. I take Khalifa’s ideas, together with the basic criteria of successful explanatory unification, as my starting point. To both, I make some corrections and additions, in order to arrive at a more robust notion of an explanatory nexus and ultimately show that its structural properties and the inter-explanatory relations it contains are relevant to the resulting understanding. I propose to represent such nexuses as directed graph trees and show that some of their properties can be related to the degree of understanding that such nested explanatory structures can offer. I will further illustrate these ideas by a case study on an eco-logical theory of predation.Stefan PetkovInstitute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciencesarticleecological theory of predationexplanatory understandingscientific explanationsunificationPhilosophy (General)B1-5802CSENSKOrganon F, Vol 28, Iss 4, Pp 746-776 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language CS
EN
SK
topic ecological theory of predation
explanatory understanding
scientific explanations
unification
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
spellingShingle ecological theory of predation
explanatory understanding
scientific explanations
unification
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
Stefan Petkov
The Degrees of Understanding and the Inferential Component of Understanding
description Current debates on the nature of explanatory understanding have converged on the idea that at least one of the core components of understanding is inferential. Philosophers have characterized the inferential dimension of understanding as consisting of several related cognitive abilities to grasp a given explanation and the nexus of complementing explanations to which it belongs. Whilst analyses of both the subjective epistemic abilities related to grasping and objective features of the inferential links within explanations have received much attention, both within theories of explanation and in the literature on understanding, the criteria for evaluating the specific structure and organization of explanatory clusters or nexuses have received much less attention. Nevertheless, two notable exceptions stand out—Khalifa’s characterization of an explanatory nexus and theories of explanatory unification. I take Khalifa’s ideas, together with the basic criteria of successful explanatory unification, as my starting point. To both, I make some corrections and additions, in order to arrive at a more robust notion of an explanatory nexus and ultimately show that its structural properties and the inter-explanatory relations it contains are relevant to the resulting understanding. I propose to represent such nexuses as directed graph trees and show that some of their properties can be related to the degree of understanding that such nested explanatory structures can offer. I will further illustrate these ideas by a case study on an eco-logical theory of predation.
format article
author Stefan Petkov
author_facet Stefan Petkov
author_sort Stefan Petkov
title The Degrees of Understanding and the Inferential Component of Understanding
title_short The Degrees of Understanding and the Inferential Component of Understanding
title_full The Degrees of Understanding and the Inferential Component of Understanding
title_fullStr The Degrees of Understanding and the Inferential Component of Understanding
title_full_unstemmed The Degrees of Understanding and the Inferential Component of Understanding
title_sort degrees of understanding and the inferential component of understanding
publisher Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28401
https://doaj.org/article/3e946dd271ff42f694b89cfb2fbcb741
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanpetkov thedegreesofunderstandingandtheinferentialcomponentofunderstanding
AT stefanpetkov degreesofunderstandingandtheinferentialcomponentofunderstanding
_version_ 1718379756454412288