An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths
Background: Shade of the teeth is of specific significance to the patient because of social and psychological concern and hence plays vital role as primary care. Bleaching is a noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, conservative, and low-maintenance method to change a smile dramatically. Aim: To study...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3eedcebbe7c440edb30aee425e2fa535 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:3eedcebbe7c440edb30aee425e2fa535 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:3eedcebbe7c440edb30aee425e2fa5352021-11-19T12:15:53ZAn environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_262_21https://doaj.org/article/3eedcebbe7c440edb30aee425e2fa5352021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1478;epage=1482;aulast=Goenkahttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Background: Shade of the teeth is of specific significance to the patient because of social and psychological concern and hence plays vital role as primary care. Bleaching is a noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, conservative, and low-maintenance method to change a smile dramatically. Aim: To study the effect of application of three bleaching agents at different wavelengths of laser on the enamel surface of teeth using an environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty freshly extracted, noncarious intact maxillary central incisors were collected and stored in moist conditions in plastic containers. Using a randomized stratified design, the samples were divided into 12 groups (n = 10). The bleaching agent was mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions and applied on the enamel surface of the teeth followed by laser activation. The ultrastructural effects of the bleaching agent on the enamel were determined with an ESEM. Samples were assessed both before and after bleaching on the basis of the degree of surface damage. Because the observation by ESEM was designed to be qualitative, no statistical analysis was performed. Results: JW power bleaching agent and Opalescence Xtra boost showed minimum surface alteration when compared to Polaoffice. Furthermore, the groups treated with diode 810 nm showed less surface damage while neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet 1064 nm more surface alterations than the groups treated with diodes. Conclusion: From this current study, it can be concluded that the diode laser of 810 nm with JW power bleaching showed minimum surface alterations.Shachi GoenkaSushil Kumar CirigiriKanika PoplaiBaig Mirza AslamShalini SinghShweta GangavaneWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlediode laserenvironmental scanning electron microscopyin-office bleachingneodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laserPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1478-1482 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
diode laser environmental scanning electron microscopy in-office bleaching neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 |
spellingShingle |
diode laser environmental scanning electron microscopy in-office bleaching neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser Pharmacy and materia medica RS1-441 Analytical chemistry QD71-142 Shachi Goenka Sushil Kumar Cirigiri Kanika Poplai Baig Mirza Aslam Shalini Singh Shweta Gangavane An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths |
description |
Background: Shade of the teeth is of specific significance to the patient because of social and psychological concern and hence plays vital role as primary care. Bleaching is a noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, conservative, and low-maintenance method to change a smile dramatically. Aim: To study the effect of application of three bleaching agents at different wavelengths of laser on the enamel surface of teeth using an environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty freshly extracted, noncarious intact maxillary central incisors were collected and stored in moist conditions in plastic containers. Using a randomized stratified design, the samples were divided into 12 groups (n = 10). The bleaching agent was mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions and applied on the enamel surface of the teeth followed by laser activation. The ultrastructural effects of the bleaching agent on the enamel were determined with an ESEM. Samples were assessed both before and after bleaching on the basis of the degree of surface damage. Because the observation by ESEM was designed to be qualitative, no statistical analysis was performed. Results: JW power bleaching agent and Opalescence Xtra boost showed minimum surface alteration when compared to Polaoffice. Furthermore, the groups treated with diode 810 nm showed less surface damage while neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet 1064 nm more surface alterations than the groups treated with diodes. Conclusion: From this current study, it can be concluded that the diode laser of 810 nm with JW power bleaching showed minimum surface alterations. |
format |
article |
author |
Shachi Goenka Sushil Kumar Cirigiri Kanika Poplai Baig Mirza Aslam Shalini Singh Shweta Gangavane |
author_facet |
Shachi Goenka Sushil Kumar Cirigiri Kanika Poplai Baig Mirza Aslam Shalini Singh Shweta Gangavane |
author_sort |
Shachi Goenka |
title |
An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths |
title_short |
An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths |
title_full |
An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths |
title_fullStr |
An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths |
title_full_unstemmed |
An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths |
title_sort |
environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/3eedcebbe7c440edb30aee425e2fa535 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shachigoenka anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths AT sushilkumarcirigiri anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths AT kanikapoplai anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths AT baigmirzaaslam anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths AT shalinisingh anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths AT shwetagangavane anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths AT shachigoenka environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths AT sushilkumarcirigiri environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths AT kanikapoplai environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths AT baigmirzaaslam environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths AT shalinisingh environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths AT shwetagangavane environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths |
_version_ |
1718420126592663552 |