An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths

Background: Shade of the teeth is of specific significance to the patient because of social and psychological concern and hence plays vital role as primary care. Bleaching is a noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, conservative, and low-maintenance method to change a smile dramatically. Aim: To study...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shachi Goenka, Sushil Kumar Cirigiri, Kanika Poplai, Baig Mirza Aslam, Shalini Singh, Shweta Gangavane
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3eedcebbe7c440edb30aee425e2fa535
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3eedcebbe7c440edb30aee425e2fa535
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3eedcebbe7c440edb30aee425e2fa5352021-11-19T12:15:53ZAn environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths0975-740610.4103/jpbs.jpbs_262_21https://doaj.org/article/3eedcebbe7c440edb30aee425e2fa5352021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1478;epage=1482;aulast=Goenkahttps://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406Background: Shade of the teeth is of specific significance to the patient because of social and psychological concern and hence plays vital role as primary care. Bleaching is a noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, conservative, and low-maintenance method to change a smile dramatically. Aim: To study the effect of application of three bleaching agents at different wavelengths of laser on the enamel surface of teeth using an environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty freshly extracted, noncarious intact maxillary central incisors were collected and stored in moist conditions in plastic containers. Using a randomized stratified design, the samples were divided into 12 groups (n = 10). The bleaching agent was mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions and applied on the enamel surface of the teeth followed by laser activation. The ultrastructural effects of the bleaching agent on the enamel were determined with an ESEM. Samples were assessed both before and after bleaching on the basis of the degree of surface damage. Because the observation by ESEM was designed to be qualitative, no statistical analysis was performed. Results: JW power bleaching agent and Opalescence Xtra boost showed minimum surface alteration when compared to Polaoffice. Furthermore, the groups treated with diode 810 nm showed less surface damage while neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet 1064 nm more surface alterations than the groups treated with diodes. Conclusion: From this current study, it can be concluded that the diode laser of 810 nm with JW power bleaching showed minimum surface alterations.Shachi GoenkaSushil Kumar CirigiriKanika PoplaiBaig Mirza AslamShalini SinghShweta GangavaneWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsarticlediode laserenvironmental scanning electron microscopyin-office bleachingneodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laserPharmacy and materia medicaRS1-441Analytical chemistryQD71-142ENJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1478-1482 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic diode laser
environmental scanning electron microscopy
in-office bleaching
neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser
Pharmacy and materia medica
RS1-441
Analytical chemistry
QD71-142
spellingShingle diode laser
environmental scanning electron microscopy
in-office bleaching
neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser
Pharmacy and materia medica
RS1-441
Analytical chemistry
QD71-142
Shachi Goenka
Sushil Kumar Cirigiri
Kanika Poplai
Baig Mirza Aslam
Shalini Singh
Shweta Gangavane
An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths
description Background: Shade of the teeth is of specific significance to the patient because of social and psychological concern and hence plays vital role as primary care. Bleaching is a noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, conservative, and low-maintenance method to change a smile dramatically. Aim: To study the effect of application of three bleaching agents at different wavelengths of laser on the enamel surface of teeth using an environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty freshly extracted, noncarious intact maxillary central incisors were collected and stored in moist conditions in plastic containers. Using a randomized stratified design, the samples were divided into 12 groups (n = 10). The bleaching agent was mixed according to the manufacturer's instructions and applied on the enamel surface of the teeth followed by laser activation. The ultrastructural effects of the bleaching agent on the enamel were determined with an ESEM. Samples were assessed both before and after bleaching on the basis of the degree of surface damage. Because the observation by ESEM was designed to be qualitative, no statistical analysis was performed. Results: JW power bleaching agent and Opalescence Xtra boost showed minimum surface alteration when compared to Polaoffice. Furthermore, the groups treated with diode 810 nm showed less surface damage while neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet 1064 nm more surface alterations than the groups treated with diodes. Conclusion: From this current study, it can be concluded that the diode laser of 810 nm with JW power bleaching showed minimum surface alterations.
format article
author Shachi Goenka
Sushil Kumar Cirigiri
Kanika Poplai
Baig Mirza Aslam
Shalini Singh
Shweta Gangavane
author_facet Shachi Goenka
Sushil Kumar Cirigiri
Kanika Poplai
Baig Mirza Aslam
Shalini Singh
Shweta Gangavane
author_sort Shachi Goenka
title An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths
title_short An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths
title_full An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths
title_fullStr An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths
title_full_unstemmed An environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths
title_sort environmental scanning electron microscopy evaluation on comparison of three different bleaching agents using the laser activated in-office bleaching at different wavelengths
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3eedcebbe7c440edb30aee425e2fa535
work_keys_str_mv AT shachigoenka anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
AT sushilkumarcirigiri anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
AT kanikapoplai anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
AT baigmirzaaslam anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
AT shalinisingh anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
AT shwetagangavane anenvironmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
AT shachigoenka environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
AT sushilkumarcirigiri environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
AT kanikapoplai environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
AT baigmirzaaslam environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
AT shalinisingh environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
AT shwetagangavane environmentalscanningelectronmicroscopyevaluationoncomparisonofthreedifferentbleachingagentsusingthelaseractivatedinofficebleachingatdifferentwavelengths
_version_ 1718420126592663552