Middle-Out Approaches to Reform of University Teaching and Learning: Champions striding between the top-down and bottom-up approaches

In recent years, Australian universities have been driven by a diversity of external forces, including funding cuts, massification of higher education, and changing student demographics, to reform their relationship with students and improve teaching and learning, particularly for those studying off...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rick Cummings, Rob Phillips, Rhondda Tilbrook, Kate Lowe
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3f2ab6583baa4959a6fbdb6ce3b28ba4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3f2ab6583baa4959a6fbdb6ce3b28ba4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3f2ab6583baa4959a6fbdb6ce3b28ba42021-12-02T19:25:49ZMiddle-Out Approaches to Reform of University Teaching and Learning: Champions striding between the top-down and bottom-up approaches10.19173/irrodl.v6i1.2241492-3831https://doaj.org/article/3f2ab6583baa4959a6fbdb6ce3b28ba42005-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/224https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831In recent years, Australian universities have been driven by a diversity of external forces, including funding cuts, massification of higher education, and changing student demographics, to reform their relationship with students and improve teaching and learning, particularly for those studying off-campus or part-time. Many universities have responded to these forces either through formal strategic plans developed top-down by executive staff or through organic developments arising from staff in a bottom-up approach. By contrast, much of Murdoch University's response has been led by a small number of staff who have middle management responsibilities and who have championed the reform of key university functions, largely in spite of current policy or accepted practice. This paper argues that the "middle-out" strategy has both a basis in change management theory and practice, and a number of strengths, including low risk, low cost, and high sustainability. Three linked examples of middle-out change management in teaching and learning at Murdoch University are described and the outcomes analyzed to demonstrate the benefits and pitfalls of this approach.Rick CummingsRob PhillipsRhondda TilbrookKate LoweAthabasca University PressarticleSpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 6, Iss 1 (2005)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Rick Cummings
Rob Phillips
Rhondda Tilbrook
Kate Lowe
Middle-Out Approaches to Reform of University Teaching and Learning: Champions striding between the top-down and bottom-up approaches
description In recent years, Australian universities have been driven by a diversity of external forces, including funding cuts, massification of higher education, and changing student demographics, to reform their relationship with students and improve teaching and learning, particularly for those studying off-campus or part-time. Many universities have responded to these forces either through formal strategic plans developed top-down by executive staff or through organic developments arising from staff in a bottom-up approach. By contrast, much of Murdoch University's response has been led by a small number of staff who have middle management responsibilities and who have championed the reform of key university functions, largely in spite of current policy or accepted practice. This paper argues that the "middle-out" strategy has both a basis in change management theory and practice, and a number of strengths, including low risk, low cost, and high sustainability. Three linked examples of middle-out change management in teaching and learning at Murdoch University are described and the outcomes analyzed to demonstrate the benefits and pitfalls of this approach.
format article
author Rick Cummings
Rob Phillips
Rhondda Tilbrook
Kate Lowe
author_facet Rick Cummings
Rob Phillips
Rhondda Tilbrook
Kate Lowe
author_sort Rick Cummings
title Middle-Out Approaches to Reform of University Teaching and Learning: Champions striding between the top-down and bottom-up approaches
title_short Middle-Out Approaches to Reform of University Teaching and Learning: Champions striding between the top-down and bottom-up approaches
title_full Middle-Out Approaches to Reform of University Teaching and Learning: Champions striding between the top-down and bottom-up approaches
title_fullStr Middle-Out Approaches to Reform of University Teaching and Learning: Champions striding between the top-down and bottom-up approaches
title_full_unstemmed Middle-Out Approaches to Reform of University Teaching and Learning: Champions striding between the top-down and bottom-up approaches
title_sort middle-out approaches to reform of university teaching and learning: champions striding between the top-down and bottom-up approaches
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2005
url https://doaj.org/article/3f2ab6583baa4959a6fbdb6ce3b28ba4
work_keys_str_mv AT rickcummings middleoutapproachestoreformofuniversityteachingandlearningchampionsstridingbetweenthetopdownandbottomupapproaches
AT robphillips middleoutapproachestoreformofuniversityteachingandlearningchampionsstridingbetweenthetopdownandbottomupapproaches
AT rhonddatilbrook middleoutapproachestoreformofuniversityteachingandlearningchampionsstridingbetweenthetopdownandbottomupapproaches
AT katelowe middleoutapproachestoreformofuniversityteachingandlearningchampionsstridingbetweenthetopdownandbottomupapproaches
_version_ 1718376553698557952