Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study

While prior research has explored various physiological consequences associated with assistive device use for ambulation, limited research has specifically explored the impact of mobility dog partnership on human kinematics. This descriptive study examined the impact of mobility dog partnership on k...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kayla Altman, Samantha Glumm, Kendall Stainton, Ellen Herlache-Pretzer, Stacey Webster, Melissa Y. Winkle
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3f37ba23b1384acbbb465fd2dda3a41b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3f37ba23b1384acbbb465fd2dda3a41b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3f37ba23b1384acbbb465fd2dda3a41b2021-11-25T19:11:52ZImpacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study10.3390/vetsci81102502306-7381https://doaj.org/article/3f37ba23b1384acbbb465fd2dda3a41b2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2306-7381/8/11/250https://doaj.org/toc/2306-7381While prior research has explored various physiological consequences associated with assistive device use for ambulation, limited research has specifically explored the impact of mobility dog partnership on human kinematics. This descriptive study examined the impact of mobility dog partnership on kinematics of individuals in the normal young adult population. Sixteen participants were video recorded while walking in a straight line for 3.7 m (12 feet) under three different conditions (ambulating with no device, ambulating with a standard cane on the left side, and ambulating with a mobility dog on the left side). Differences between joint angles under each of the conditions were analyzed. Statistically significant differences were found in left elbow flexion when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with no device; left shoulder abduction when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with a mobility dog, ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and ambulating with a cane versus no device; and left hip extension when comparing ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and when ambulating with a mobility dog versus a cane. These findings suggest that providers should evaluate and monitor potential negative impacts of assistive devices such as mobility dogs on human kinematics.Kayla AltmanSamantha GlummKendall StaintonEllen Herlache-PretzerStacey WebsterMelissa Y. WinkleMDPI AGarticlemobility dogkinematicsassistive devicekinoveaambulationVeterinary medicineSF600-1100ENVeterinary Sciences, Vol 8, Iss 250, p 250 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic mobility dog
kinematics
assistive device
kinovea
ambulation
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
spellingShingle mobility dog
kinematics
assistive device
kinovea
ambulation
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Kayla Altman
Samantha Glumm
Kendall Stainton
Ellen Herlache-Pretzer
Stacey Webster
Melissa Y. Winkle
Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
description While prior research has explored various physiological consequences associated with assistive device use for ambulation, limited research has specifically explored the impact of mobility dog partnership on human kinematics. This descriptive study examined the impact of mobility dog partnership on kinematics of individuals in the normal young adult population. Sixteen participants were video recorded while walking in a straight line for 3.7 m (12 feet) under three different conditions (ambulating with no device, ambulating with a standard cane on the left side, and ambulating with a mobility dog on the left side). Differences between joint angles under each of the conditions were analyzed. Statistically significant differences were found in left elbow flexion when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with no device; left shoulder abduction when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with a mobility dog, ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and ambulating with a cane versus no device; and left hip extension when comparing ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and when ambulating with a mobility dog versus a cane. These findings suggest that providers should evaluate and monitor potential negative impacts of assistive devices such as mobility dogs on human kinematics.
format article
author Kayla Altman
Samantha Glumm
Kendall Stainton
Ellen Herlache-Pretzer
Stacey Webster
Melissa Y. Winkle
author_facet Kayla Altman
Samantha Glumm
Kendall Stainton
Ellen Herlache-Pretzer
Stacey Webster
Melissa Y. Winkle
author_sort Kayla Altman
title Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
title_short Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
title_full Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
title_fullStr Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
title_sort impacts of mobility dogs on kinematics during ambulation: a quantitative study
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3f37ba23b1384acbbb465fd2dda3a41b
work_keys_str_mv AT kaylaaltman impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy
AT samanthaglumm impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy
AT kendallstainton impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy
AT ellenherlachepretzer impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy
AT staceywebster impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy
AT melissaywinkle impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy
_version_ 1718410148718837760