Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
ABSTRACT Regulatory RNAs have emerged as ubiquitous gene regulators in all bacterial species studied to date. The combination of sequence-specific RNA interactions and malleable RNA structure has allowed regulatory RNA to adopt different mechanisms of gene regulation in a diversity of genetic backgr...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/3f39776b40374676984e58606645f9fc |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | ABSTRACT Regulatory RNAs have emerged as ubiquitous gene regulators in all bacterial species studied to date. The combination of sequence-specific RNA interactions and malleable RNA structure has allowed regulatory RNA to adopt different mechanisms of gene regulation in a diversity of genetic backgrounds. In the model Gammaproteobacteria Escherichia coli and Salmonella, the regulatory RNA chaperone Hfq appears to play a global role in gene regulation, directly controlling ∼20 to 25% of the entire transcriptome. While the model Firmicutes Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus encode a Hfq homologue, its role has been significantly depreciated. These bacteria also have marked differences in RNA turnover. E. coli and Salmonella degrade RNA through internal endonucleolytic and 3′→5′ exonucleolytic cleavage that appears to allow transient accumulation of mRNA 3′ UTR cleavage fragments that contain stabilizing 3′ structures. In contrast, B. subtilis and S. aureus are able to exonucleolytically attack internally cleaved RNA from both the 5′ and 3′ ends, efficiently degrading mRNA 3′ UTR fragments. Here, we propose that the lack of 5′→3′ exoribonuclease activity in Gammaproteobacteria has allowed the accumulation of mRNA 3′ UTR ends as the “default” setting. This in turn may have provided a larger pool of unconstrained RNA sequences that has fueled the expansion of Hfq function and small RNA (sRNA) regulation in E. coli and Salmonella. Conversely, the exoribonuclease RNase J may be a significant barrier to the evolution of 3′ UTR sRNAs in B. subtilis and S. aureus that has limited the pool of RNA ligands available to Hfq and other sRNA chaperones, depreciating their function in these model Firmicutes. |
|---|