Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?

ABSTRACT Regulatory RNAs have emerged as ubiquitous gene regulators in all bacterial species studied to date. The combination of sequence-specific RNA interactions and malleable RNA structure has allowed regulatory RNA to adopt different mechanisms of gene regulation in a diversity of genetic backgr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel G. Mediati, David Lalaouna, Jai J. Tree
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2021
Materias:
Hfq
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3f39776b40374676984e58606645f9fc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3f39776b40374676984e58606645f9fc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3f39776b40374676984e58606645f9fc2021-11-10T18:37:50ZBurning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?10.1128/mBio.01041-212150-7511https://doaj.org/article/3f39776b40374676984e58606645f9fc2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.01041-21https://doaj.org/toc/2150-7511ABSTRACT Regulatory RNAs have emerged as ubiquitous gene regulators in all bacterial species studied to date. The combination of sequence-specific RNA interactions and malleable RNA structure has allowed regulatory RNA to adopt different mechanisms of gene regulation in a diversity of genetic backgrounds. In the model Gammaproteobacteria Escherichia coli and Salmonella, the regulatory RNA chaperone Hfq appears to play a global role in gene regulation, directly controlling ∼20 to 25% of the entire transcriptome. While the model Firmicutes Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus encode a Hfq homologue, its role has been significantly depreciated. These bacteria also have marked differences in RNA turnover. E. coli and Salmonella degrade RNA through internal endonucleolytic and 3′→5′ exonucleolytic cleavage that appears to allow transient accumulation of mRNA 3′ UTR cleavage fragments that contain stabilizing 3′ structures. In contrast, B. subtilis and S. aureus are able to exonucleolytically attack internally cleaved RNA from both the 5′ and 3′ ends, efficiently degrading mRNA 3′ UTR fragments. Here, we propose that the lack of 5′→3′ exoribonuclease activity in Gammaproteobacteria has allowed the accumulation of mRNA 3′ UTR ends as the “default” setting. This in turn may have provided a larger pool of unconstrained RNA sequences that has fueled the expansion of Hfq function and small RNA (sRNA) regulation in E. coli and Salmonella. Conversely, the exoribonuclease RNase J may be a significant barrier to the evolution of 3′ UTR sRNAs in B. subtilis and S. aureus that has limited the pool of RNA ligands available to Hfq and other sRNA chaperones, depreciating their function in these model Firmicutes.Daniel G. MediatiDavid LalaounaJai J. TreeAmerican Society for Microbiologyarticle3′ UTRHfqRNA decayRNase Jevolutionsmall RNAMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmBio, Vol 12, Iss 4 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic 3′ UTR
Hfq
RNA decay
RNase J
evolution
small RNA
Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle 3′ UTR
Hfq
RNA decay
RNase J
evolution
small RNA
Microbiology
QR1-502
Daniel G. Mediati
David Lalaouna
Jai J. Tree
Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
description ABSTRACT Regulatory RNAs have emerged as ubiquitous gene regulators in all bacterial species studied to date. The combination of sequence-specific RNA interactions and malleable RNA structure has allowed regulatory RNA to adopt different mechanisms of gene regulation in a diversity of genetic backgrounds. In the model Gammaproteobacteria Escherichia coli and Salmonella, the regulatory RNA chaperone Hfq appears to play a global role in gene regulation, directly controlling ∼20 to 25% of the entire transcriptome. While the model Firmicutes Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus encode a Hfq homologue, its role has been significantly depreciated. These bacteria also have marked differences in RNA turnover. E. coli and Salmonella degrade RNA through internal endonucleolytic and 3′→5′ exonucleolytic cleavage that appears to allow transient accumulation of mRNA 3′ UTR cleavage fragments that contain stabilizing 3′ structures. In contrast, B. subtilis and S. aureus are able to exonucleolytically attack internally cleaved RNA from both the 5′ and 3′ ends, efficiently degrading mRNA 3′ UTR fragments. Here, we propose that the lack of 5′→3′ exoribonuclease activity in Gammaproteobacteria has allowed the accumulation of mRNA 3′ UTR ends as the “default” setting. This in turn may have provided a larger pool of unconstrained RNA sequences that has fueled the expansion of Hfq function and small RNA (sRNA) regulation in E. coli and Salmonella. Conversely, the exoribonuclease RNase J may be a significant barrier to the evolution of 3′ UTR sRNAs in B. subtilis and S. aureus that has limited the pool of RNA ligands available to Hfq and other sRNA chaperones, depreciating their function in these model Firmicutes.
format article
author Daniel G. Mediati
David Lalaouna
Jai J. Tree
author_facet Daniel G. Mediati
David Lalaouna
Jai J. Tree
author_sort Daniel G. Mediati
title Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
title_short Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
title_full Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
title_fullStr Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
title_full_unstemmed Burning the Candle at Both Ends: Have Exoribonucleases Driven Divergence of Regulatory RNA Mechanisms in Bacteria?
title_sort burning the candle at both ends: have exoribonucleases driven divergence of regulatory rna mechanisms in bacteria?
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3f39776b40374676984e58606645f9fc
work_keys_str_mv AT danielgmediati burningthecandleatbothendshaveexoribonucleasesdrivendivergenceofregulatoryrnamechanismsinbacteria
AT davidlalaouna burningthecandleatbothendshaveexoribonucleasesdrivendivergenceofregulatoryrnamechanismsinbacteria
AT jaijtree burningthecandleatbothendshaveexoribonucleasesdrivendivergenceofregulatoryrnamechanismsinbacteria
_version_ 1718439858827952128