An Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study

Insects have been reported as a possible alternative solution to help feed the growing world population with less stress on the planet, thus contributing to the preservation of the environment and natural ecosystems. However, the consumption of edible insects (EIs), although culturally accepted for...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raquel P. F. Guiné, Sofia G. Florença, Ofélia Anjos, Paula M. R. Correia, Bruno M. Ferreira, Cristina A. Costa
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3f3c4ae34ab949a2b3f40aac139ac432
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3f3c4ae34ab949a2b3f40aac139ac432
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3f3c4ae34ab949a2b3f40aac139ac4322021-11-11T19:40:39ZAn Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study10.3390/su1321120142071-1050https://doaj.org/article/3f3c4ae34ab949a2b3f40aac139ac4322021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/21/12014https://doaj.org/toc/2071-1050Insects have been reported as a possible alternative solution to help feed the growing world population with less stress on the planet, thus contributing to the preservation of the environment and natural ecosystems. However, the consumption of edible insects (EIs), although culturally accepted for some communities, is not readily accepted for others. Hence this work explores the level of information that people in a traditionally non-insect-eating country have about the sustainability issues related with EIs, and also some possible reasons that could motivate their consumption. The study was based on a questionnaire survey and the results were explored by descriptive statistic tools, tree classification analysis, factor analysis and cluster analysis. The results showed that the level of information is still low in general, with most people not manifesting an opinion. However, some aspects are relatively familiar to the participants (88.9% know that the ecological footprint of insects is smaller than other meats and 86.9% know that they efficiently convert organic matter into protein). Factor and cluster analysis showed three classes: cluster 1—people not informed about the facts disclosed through the true statements and also not able to distinguish the false information; cluster 2—people not informed about the facts disclosed through the true statements but who were able to distinguish the false information; and cluster 3—people well informed about the facts disclosed through the true statements but who were marginally unable to distinguish the false information. It was also found that education, sex and professional area are the most relevant sociodemographic factors associated with the level of information, and the highest motivations to consume EIs are their contribution to preserve the environment and natural resources followed by being a more sustainable option (for 64.7% and 53.4% of participants, respectively). Hence it was concluded that, although some work still needs to be done to better inform people about EIs, there is already some conscientiousness that they constitute a good and more sustainable alternative to other types of meat.Raquel P. F. GuinéSofia G. FlorençaOfélia AnjosPaula M. R. CorreiaBruno M. FerreiraCristina A. CostaMDPI AGarticleedible insectssustainabilityinformationquestionnaire surveyEnvironmental effects of industries and plantsTD194-195Renewable energy sourcesTJ807-830Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENSustainability, Vol 13, Iss 12014, p 12014 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic edible insects
sustainability
information
questionnaire survey
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle edible insects
sustainability
information
questionnaire survey
Environmental effects of industries and plants
TD194-195
Renewable energy sources
TJ807-830
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Raquel P. F. Guiné
Sofia G. Florença
Ofélia Anjos
Paula M. R. Correia
Bruno M. Ferreira
Cristina A. Costa
An Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study
description Insects have been reported as a possible alternative solution to help feed the growing world population with less stress on the planet, thus contributing to the preservation of the environment and natural ecosystems. However, the consumption of edible insects (EIs), although culturally accepted for some communities, is not readily accepted for others. Hence this work explores the level of information that people in a traditionally non-insect-eating country have about the sustainability issues related with EIs, and also some possible reasons that could motivate their consumption. The study was based on a questionnaire survey and the results were explored by descriptive statistic tools, tree classification analysis, factor analysis and cluster analysis. The results showed that the level of information is still low in general, with most people not manifesting an opinion. However, some aspects are relatively familiar to the participants (88.9% know that the ecological footprint of insects is smaller than other meats and 86.9% know that they efficiently convert organic matter into protein). Factor and cluster analysis showed three classes: cluster 1—people not informed about the facts disclosed through the true statements and also not able to distinguish the false information; cluster 2—people not informed about the facts disclosed through the true statements but who were able to distinguish the false information; and cluster 3—people well informed about the facts disclosed through the true statements but who were marginally unable to distinguish the false information. It was also found that education, sex and professional area are the most relevant sociodemographic factors associated with the level of information, and the highest motivations to consume EIs are their contribution to preserve the environment and natural resources followed by being a more sustainable option (for 64.7% and 53.4% of participants, respectively). Hence it was concluded that, although some work still needs to be done to better inform people about EIs, there is already some conscientiousness that they constitute a good and more sustainable alternative to other types of meat.
format article
author Raquel P. F. Guiné
Sofia G. Florença
Ofélia Anjos
Paula M. R. Correia
Bruno M. Ferreira
Cristina A. Costa
author_facet Raquel P. F. Guiné
Sofia G. Florença
Ofélia Anjos
Paula M. R. Correia
Bruno M. Ferreira
Cristina A. Costa
author_sort Raquel P. F. Guiné
title An Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study
title_short An Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study
title_full An Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study
title_fullStr An Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study
title_full_unstemmed An Insight into the Level of Information about Sustainability of Edible Insects in a Traditionally Non-Insect-Eating Country: Exploratory Study
title_sort insight into the level of information about sustainability of edible insects in a traditionally non-insect-eating country: exploratory study
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/3f3c4ae34ab949a2b3f40aac139ac432
work_keys_str_mv AT raquelpfguine aninsightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
AT sofiagflorenca aninsightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
AT ofeliaanjos aninsightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
AT paulamrcorreia aninsightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
AT brunomferreira aninsightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
AT cristinaacosta aninsightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
AT raquelpfguine insightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
AT sofiagflorenca insightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
AT ofeliaanjos insightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
AT paulamrcorreia insightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
AT brunomferreira insightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
AT cristinaacosta insightintothelevelofinformationaboutsustainabilityofedibleinsectsinatraditionallynoninsecteatingcountryexploratorystudy
_version_ 1718431460227022848