The Automated External Defibrillator: Heterogeneity of Legislation, Mapping and Use across Europe. New Insights from the ENSURE Study

Introduction: The rapid use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) is crucial for increased survival after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Many factors could play a role in limiting the chance of an AED use. We aimed to verify the situation regarding AED legislation, the AED mapping...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Enrico Baldi, Niccolò B. Grieco, Giuseppe Ristagno, Hajriz Alihodžić, Valentine Canon, Alexei Birkun, Ruggero Cresta, Diana Cimpoesu, Carlo Clarens, Julian Ganter, Andrej Markota, Pierre Mols, Olympia Nikolaidou, Martin Quinn, Violetta Raffay, Fernando Rosell Ortiz, Ari Salo, Remy Stieglis, Anneli Strömsöe, Ingvild Tjelmeland, Stefan Trenkler, Jan Wnent, Jan-Thorsten Grasner, Bernd W. Böttiger, Simone Savastano
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3f7af69ec2b440d29b8cecf1144b9018
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction: The rapid use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) is crucial for increased survival after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Many factors could play a role in limiting the chance of an AED use. We aimed to verify the situation regarding AED legislation, the AED mapping system and first responders (FRs) equipped with an AED across European countries. Methods: We performed a survey across Europe entitled “European Study about AED Use by Lay Rescuers” (ENSURE), asking the national coordinators of the European Registry of Cardiac Arrest (EuReCa) program to complete it. Results: Nineteen European countries replied to the survey request for a population covering 128,297,955 inhabitants. The results revealed that every citizen can use an AED in 15 countries whereas a training certificate was required in three countries. In one country, only EMS personnel were allowed to use an AED. An AED mapping system and FRs equipped with an AED were available in only 11 countries. The AED use rate was 12–59% where AED mapping and FR systems were implemented, which was considerably higher than in other countries (0–7.9%), reflecting the difference in OHCA survival. Conclusions: Our survey highlighted a heterogeneity in AED legislation, AED mapping systems and AED use in Europe, which was reflected in different AED use and survival.