Self and Knowledge

The contempomy intellectual revival of Muslim societies proposes a profound but problematic relationship between identity and epistemology, and between self and knowledge. I propose to elucidate this relationship and its implications by making a fundamental distinction between self and identity, an...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: M. A. Muqtedar Khan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/3faabd9f053c4aeb81c55cb77e89f2f9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:3faabd9f053c4aeb81c55cb77e89f2f9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:3faabd9f053c4aeb81c55cb77e89f2f92021-12-02T18:18:45ZSelf and Knowledge10.35632/ajis.v16i1.21312690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/3faabd9f053c4aeb81c55cb77e89f2f91999-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/2131https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 The contempomy intellectual revival of Muslim societies proposes a profound but problematic relationship between identity and epistemology, and between self and knowledge. I propose to elucidate this relationship and its implications by making a fundamental distinction between self and identity, and showing how there can be many identities but only one self. I begin by inquiring into the meaning of identity symbols such as “Islam” or “Muslim” prior to knowledge. For example, what is the meaning and relationship between identity and knowledge in Islamization of knowledge or Islamic Philosophy? In both types of knowledge, identity is prior to knowledge in an epistemological, as well as an ontological sense. Ontologically we are suggesting that the existence of Islamic psychology or Islamic philosophy is contingent on the being of an agency such as Islam or Muslims. Epistemologically we are arguing that Islam includes a theory of knowledge, and Islamic principles constitute paradigmatic values from which Islamic psychology or Islamic philosophy can be derived. Cleqly, the prefix Islamic gives an identity to knowledge. In other words, there are certain truth claims which derive their legitimacy not because their truth is self-evident or rationally deducible or empirically verifiable, but because they satisfy certain criteria which establishes their identity as Islamic. The issue of criteria that determine what constitutes knowledge (epistemology) is indeed crucial. The first thing that needs to be resolved is whether these criteria are universally intelligible or are functions of culturehdentity and value systems. I would like to posit that in the realms of socially meaningful practices it is possible to have relativistic criteria for determining the validity of social truths. Knowledge about answers to questions such as Is polygyny or homosexuality acceptable? or Are religious rights more important than economic rights? may be determined based on criteria that are located within the corpus of tradition and ethos of a given cultural milieu This is accomodation of cultural p l d s m . But in the realms of science and philosophy, reasoning and empirical evidence alone ... M. A. Muqtedar KhanInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 16, Iss 1 (1999)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
M. A. Muqtedar Khan
Self and Knowledge
description The contempomy intellectual revival of Muslim societies proposes a profound but problematic relationship between identity and epistemology, and between self and knowledge. I propose to elucidate this relationship and its implications by making a fundamental distinction between self and identity, and showing how there can be many identities but only one self. I begin by inquiring into the meaning of identity symbols such as “Islam” or “Muslim” prior to knowledge. For example, what is the meaning and relationship between identity and knowledge in Islamization of knowledge or Islamic Philosophy? In both types of knowledge, identity is prior to knowledge in an epistemological, as well as an ontological sense. Ontologically we are suggesting that the existence of Islamic psychology or Islamic philosophy is contingent on the being of an agency such as Islam or Muslims. Epistemologically we are arguing that Islam includes a theory of knowledge, and Islamic principles constitute paradigmatic values from which Islamic psychology or Islamic philosophy can be derived. Cleqly, the prefix Islamic gives an identity to knowledge. In other words, there are certain truth claims which derive their legitimacy not because their truth is self-evident or rationally deducible or empirically verifiable, but because they satisfy certain criteria which establishes their identity as Islamic. The issue of criteria that determine what constitutes knowledge (epistemology) is indeed crucial. The first thing that needs to be resolved is whether these criteria are universally intelligible or are functions of culturehdentity and value systems. I would like to posit that in the realms of socially meaningful practices it is possible to have relativistic criteria for determining the validity of social truths. Knowledge about answers to questions such as Is polygyny or homosexuality acceptable? or Are religious rights more important than economic rights? may be determined based on criteria that are located within the corpus of tradition and ethos of a given cultural milieu This is accomodation of cultural p l d s m . But in the realms of science and philosophy, reasoning and empirical evidence alone ...
format article
author M. A. Muqtedar Khan
author_facet M. A. Muqtedar Khan
author_sort M. A. Muqtedar Khan
title Self and Knowledge
title_short Self and Knowledge
title_full Self and Knowledge
title_fullStr Self and Knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Self and Knowledge
title_sort self and knowledge
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 1999
url https://doaj.org/article/3faabd9f053c4aeb81c55cb77e89f2f9
work_keys_str_mv AT mamuqtedarkhan selfandknowledge
_version_ 1718378208873676800