A Sequential Approach to the Management of Posterior Glenoid Defects in RSA

Background:. Large posterior glenoid defects pose problems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). We have adopted a sequential approach to the management of posterior glenoid defects using asymmetrical reaming, the placement of a ring graft around the central peg (bony-increased offset, or BIO), or...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Shinji Imai, MD, PhD
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:	Orthopedic surgery RD701-811
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/3fd20e78a2db45eeaf2168caf158eb9c
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:3fd20e78a2db45eeaf2168caf158eb9c
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:3fd20e78a2db45eeaf2168caf158eb9c2021-11-25T07:59:02ZA Sequential Approach to the Management of Posterior Glenoid Defects in RSA2472-724510.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00049https://doaj.org/article/3fd20e78a2db45eeaf2168caf158eb9c2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00049https://doaj.org/toc/2472-7245Background:. Large posterior glenoid defects pose problems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). We have adopted a sequential approach to the management of posterior glenoid defects using asymmetrical reaming, the placement of a ring graft around the central peg (bony-increased offset, or BIO), or structural bone-grafting, depending on the amount of glenoid retroversion. Furthermore, we have devised multiple bioresorbable pinning (MBP)-assisted bone-grafting, in which as many bioresorbable pins as required are inserted, from whichever aspects of the graft necessary, to achieve initial stability. Methods:. We reviewed 52 shoulders with posterior glenoid defects undergoing RSA between 2014 and 2019 (mean follow-up, 4.8 years; range, 2 to 6 years). Twenty (38.5%) of the shoulders had glenoid retroversion of <15° and were treated by asymmetrical reaming (Group A), 19 (36.5%) of the shoulders had retroversion of ≥15° to <30° and were treated with asymmetrical reaming combined with angulated ring graft around the central peg (Group B), and 13 (25.0%) of the shoulders had retroversion of ≥30° and were treated with MBP-assisted bone-grafting (Group C). Results:. Mean version correction was 10.6° ± 4.3° in Group A, 20.7° ± 8.8° in Group B, and 33.8° ± 9.6° in Group C. The mean postoperative active anterior elevation was 138.3° ± 12.3°, 128.3° ± 12.3°, and 126.5° ± 15.3° in the 3 groups, respectively. The mean postoperative Constant score was 66.8 ± 14.6, 62.2 ± 13.5, and 61.7 ± 16.7, respectively. The mean preoperative active anterior elevation was significantly higher in Group A than in Group C (p = 0.037). The full or partial graft-incorporation rate (≥25% of original size) was 89.5% in Group B and 100% in Group C. One glenoid fracture and 1 case of transient brachial plexus palsy occurred in Group B (10.5%), and 1 acromion fracture and 2 cases of transient brachial plexus palsy occurred in Group C (23.1%). Conclusions:. The results of the present sequential approach to management of posterior glenoid defects by the 3 modalities were acceptable. The present MBP-assisted bone-grafting procedure is an effective treatment for cases of shoulder arthropathy with severe posterior glenoid defects. Angulated ring grafting around the central peg may yield equally acceptable results, although its graft-incorporation rate requires further follow-up. Level of Evidence:. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.Shinji Imai, MD, PhDWolters KluwerarticleOrthopedic surgeryRD701-811ENJBJS Open Access, Vol 6, Iss 4 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Orthopedic surgery RD701-811
spellingShingle	Orthopedic surgery RD701-811 Shinji Imai, MD, PhD A Sequential Approach to the Management of Posterior Glenoid Defects in RSA
description	Background:. Large posterior glenoid defects pose problems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). We have adopted a sequential approach to the management of posterior glenoid defects using asymmetrical reaming, the placement of a ring graft around the central peg (bony-increased offset, or BIO), or structural bone-grafting, depending on the amount of glenoid retroversion. Furthermore, we have devised multiple bioresorbable pinning (MBP)-assisted bone-grafting, in which as many bioresorbable pins as required are inserted, from whichever aspects of the graft necessary, to achieve initial stability. Methods:. We reviewed 52 shoulders with posterior glenoid defects undergoing RSA between 2014 and 2019 (mean follow-up, 4.8 years; range, 2 to 6 years). Twenty (38.5%) of the shoulders had glenoid retroversion of <15° and were treated by asymmetrical reaming (Group A), 19 (36.5%) of the shoulders had retroversion of ≥15° to <30° and were treated with asymmetrical reaming combined with angulated ring graft around the central peg (Group B), and 13 (25.0%) of the shoulders had retroversion of ≥30° and were treated with MBP-assisted bone-grafting (Group C). Results:. Mean version correction was 10.6° ± 4.3° in Group A, 20.7° ± 8.8° in Group B, and 33.8° ± 9.6° in Group C. The mean postoperative active anterior elevation was 138.3° ± 12.3°, 128.3° ± 12.3°, and 126.5° ± 15.3° in the 3 groups, respectively. The mean postoperative Constant score was 66.8 ± 14.6, 62.2 ± 13.5, and 61.7 ± 16.7, respectively. The mean preoperative active anterior elevation was significantly higher in Group A than in Group C (p = 0.037). The full or partial graft-incorporation rate (≥25% of original size) was 89.5% in Group B and 100% in Group C. One glenoid fracture and 1 case of transient brachial plexus palsy occurred in Group B (10.5%), and 1 acromion fracture and 2 cases of transient brachial plexus palsy occurred in Group C (23.1%). Conclusions:. The results of the present sequential approach to management of posterior glenoid defects by the 3 modalities were acceptable. The present MBP-assisted bone-grafting procedure is an effective treatment for cases of shoulder arthropathy with severe posterior glenoid defects. Angulated ring grafting around the central peg may yield equally acceptable results, although its graft-incorporation rate requires further follow-up. Level of Evidence:. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
format	article
author	Shinji Imai, MD, PhD
author_facet	Shinji Imai, MD, PhD
author_sort	Shinji Imai, MD, PhD
title	A Sequential Approach to the Management of Posterior Glenoid Defects in RSA
title_short	A Sequential Approach to the Management of Posterior Glenoid Defects in RSA
title_full	A Sequential Approach to the Management of Posterior Glenoid Defects in RSA
title_fullStr	A Sequential Approach to the Management of Posterior Glenoid Defects in RSA
title_full_unstemmed	A Sequential Approach to the Management of Posterior Glenoid Defects in RSA
title_sort	sequential approach to the management of posterior glenoid defects in rsa
publisher	Wolters Kluwer
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/3fd20e78a2db45eeaf2168caf158eb9c
work_keys_str_mv	AT shinjiimaimdphd asequentialapproachtothemanagementofposteriorglenoiddefectsinrsa AT shinjiimaimdphd sequentialapproachtothemanagementofposteriorglenoiddefectsinrsa
_version_	1718413552592617472

A Sequential Approach to the Management of Posterior Glenoid Defects in RSA

Ejemplares similares