Towards an integrated model for supervision for mental health and psychosocial support in humanitarian emergencies: A qualitative study.

<h4>Background</h4>Despite recent advances in the development and provision of mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) in humanitarian settings, inadequate supervision remains a significant barrier to successful implementation. The present study sought to incorporate broad stakeho...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Camila Perera, Kelly A McBride, Áine Travers, Pia Tingsted Blum, Nana Wiedemann, Cecilie Dinesen, Byron Bitanihirwe, Frédérique Vallières
Format: article
Langue:EN
Publié: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Sujets:
R
Q
Accès en ligne:https://doaj.org/article/3ff176d0c7964c53b84a2903bafca8df
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
Description
Résumé:<h4>Background</h4>Despite recent advances in the development and provision of mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) in humanitarian settings, inadequate supervision remains a significant barrier to successful implementation. The present study sought to incorporate broad stakeholder engagement as part of the first phase of development of a new Integrated Model for Supervision (IMS) for use within MHPSS and protection services in humanitarian emergencies.<h4>Methods</h4>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 global mental health professionals. Data was analysed thematically, using a combination of inductive and deductive methods. Codes and themes were validated through co-author cross-checks and through a webinar with an expert advisory group.<h4>Results</h4>Results reinforce the importance of effective supervision to enhance the quality of interventions and to protect supervisees' wellbeing. Participants generally agreed that regular, supportive supervision on a one-to-one basis and as a separate system from line management, is the ideal format. The interviews highlight a need for guidance in specific areas, such as monitoring and evaluation, and navigating power imbalances in the supervisory relationship. Several approaches to supervision were described, including some solutions for use in low-resource situations, such as group, peer-to-peer or remote supervision.<h4>Conclusion</h4>An integrated model for supervision (IMS) should offer a unified framework encompassing a definition of supervision, consolidation of best practice, and goals and guidance for the supervisory process.