Selecting the Optimal Building System Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making Emphasising on Three Methods of TOPSIS , SAW, AHP

Nowadays, various factors complicate the decision making process and the need to make decisions that consider all the factors in question, they are more than ever before. The internal and external researchers, have shown interest in the multi-criteria decision making. In our study, the method includ...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alireza Rezaiean, Seyed Amirhosein Hoseini
Formato: article
Lenguaje:FA
Publicado: Iranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE) 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/401366b91df84cd3a960f8e4d56a764b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:401366b91df84cd3a960f8e4d56a764b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:401366b91df84cd3a960f8e4d56a764b2021-11-08T15:45:14ZSelecting the Optimal Building System Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making Emphasising on Three Methods of TOPSIS , SAW, AHP2476-39772538-2616https://doaj.org/article/401366b91df84cd3a960f8e4d56a764b2015-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.jsce.ir/article_38621_50121a3131d222d3c64d183900c071b4.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2476-3977https://doaj.org/toc/2538-2616Nowadays, various factors complicate the decision making process and the need to make decisions that consider all the factors in question, they are more than ever before. The internal and external researchers, have shown interest in the multi-criteria decision making. In our study, the method includes a multi-criteria decision making method such as Analytical Hierarchy Process, Simple additive weighting and TOPSIS )Technique for order-prefrence by similarity to ideal solution(  to solve the selection problem of building efficient systems we have used. Systems that have been evaluated in this issue include: Lightweight Steel Frames, Insulating concrete formwork, 3D-PANEL and Prefabricated reinforced concrete systems. Required data using the questionnaire sample (n = 150) were examined. Questionnaires among the mass of experts, academic institutions and conferences were distributed. According to the research results, using different methods of decision making, the results will yield fairly similar, so that all three methods, Prefabricated reinforced concrete systems in the first place, and the Lightweight Steel Frames system was in the Second place. The Prefabricated reinforced concrete systems, in terms of administrative and economic criterias, in the first place, and the system Lightweight Steel Frames, ranked first in terms of environmental criteria accounted for.Alireza RezaieanSeyed Amirhosein HoseiniIranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE)articlemultiple criteria decision makingtopsisanalytical hierarchy processsimple additive weightingselecting the optimal building systemBridge engineeringTG1-470Building constructionTH1-9745FAJournal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Vol 2, Iss 2, Pp 16-27 (2015)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language FA
topic multiple criteria decision making
topsis
analytical hierarchy process
simple additive weighting
selecting the optimal building system
Bridge engineering
TG1-470
Building construction
TH1-9745
spellingShingle multiple criteria decision making
topsis
analytical hierarchy process
simple additive weighting
selecting the optimal building system
Bridge engineering
TG1-470
Building construction
TH1-9745
Alireza Rezaiean
Seyed Amirhosein Hoseini
Selecting the Optimal Building System Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making Emphasising on Three Methods of TOPSIS , SAW, AHP
description Nowadays, various factors complicate the decision making process and the need to make decisions that consider all the factors in question, they are more than ever before. The internal and external researchers, have shown interest in the multi-criteria decision making. In our study, the method includes a multi-criteria decision making method such as Analytical Hierarchy Process, Simple additive weighting and TOPSIS )Technique for order-prefrence by similarity to ideal solution(  to solve the selection problem of building efficient systems we have used. Systems that have been evaluated in this issue include: Lightweight Steel Frames, Insulating concrete formwork, 3D-PANEL and Prefabricated reinforced concrete systems. Required data using the questionnaire sample (n = 150) were examined. Questionnaires among the mass of experts, academic institutions and conferences were distributed. According to the research results, using different methods of decision making, the results will yield fairly similar, so that all three methods, Prefabricated reinforced concrete systems in the first place, and the Lightweight Steel Frames system was in the Second place. The Prefabricated reinforced concrete systems, in terms of administrative and economic criterias, in the first place, and the system Lightweight Steel Frames, ranked first in terms of environmental criteria accounted for.
format article
author Alireza Rezaiean
Seyed Amirhosein Hoseini
author_facet Alireza Rezaiean
Seyed Amirhosein Hoseini
author_sort Alireza Rezaiean
title Selecting the Optimal Building System Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making Emphasising on Three Methods of TOPSIS , SAW, AHP
title_short Selecting the Optimal Building System Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making Emphasising on Three Methods of TOPSIS , SAW, AHP
title_full Selecting the Optimal Building System Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making Emphasising on Three Methods of TOPSIS , SAW, AHP
title_fullStr Selecting the Optimal Building System Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making Emphasising on Three Methods of TOPSIS , SAW, AHP
title_full_unstemmed Selecting the Optimal Building System Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making Emphasising on Three Methods of TOPSIS , SAW, AHP
title_sort selecting the optimal building system using multiple criteria decision making emphasising on three methods of topsis , saw, ahp
publisher Iranian Society of Structrual Engineering (ISSE)
publishDate 2015
url https://doaj.org/article/401366b91df84cd3a960f8e4d56a764b
work_keys_str_mv AT alirezarezaiean selectingtheoptimalbuildingsystemusingmultiplecriteriadecisionmakingemphasisingonthreemethodsoftopsissawahp
AT seyedamirhoseinhoseini selectingtheoptimalbuildingsystemusingmultiplecriteriadecisionmakingemphasisingonthreemethodsoftopsissawahp
_version_ 1718441742378729472