Maximum levels of cross‐contamination for 24 antimicrobial active substances in non‐target feed.
Part 3: Amprolium

Maximum levels of cross‐contamination for 24 antimicrobial active substances in non‐target feed.
Part 3: Amprolium

Abstract The specific concentrations of amprolium in non‐target feed for food‐producing animals, below which there would not be an effect on the emergence of, and/or selection for, resistance in bacteria relevant for human and animal health, as well as the specific antimicrobial concentrations in fe...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Konstantinos Koutsoumanis, Ana Allende, Avelino Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Declan Bolton, Sara Bover‐Cid, Marianne Chemaly, Robert Davies, Alessandra De Cesare, Lieve Herman, Friederike Hilbert, Roland Lindqvist, Maarten Nauta, Giuseppe Ru, Marion Simmons, Panagiotis Skandamis, Elisabetta Suffredini, Dan I Andersson, Vasileios Bampidis, Johan Bengtsson‐Palme, Damien Bouchard, Aude Ferran, Maryline Kouba, Secundino López Puente, Marta López‐Alonso, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Alena Pechová, Mariana Petkova, Sebastien Girault, Alessandro Broglia, Beatriz Guerra, Matteo Lorenzo Innocenti, Ernesto Liébana, Gloria López‐Gálvez, Paola Manini, Pietro Stella, Luisa Peixe
Format: article
Langue:EN
Publié: Wiley 2021
Sujets:
amprolium
antimicrobial resistance
subinhibitory concentration
Feed Antimicrobial Resistance Selection Concentration (FARSC), growth promotion
yield increase
food‐producing animals
Nutrition. Foods and food supply
TX341-641
Chemical technology
TP1-1185
Accès en ligne:https://doaj.org/article/40bdc3d9853b4d879eaf6a21c8009a42
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
Description
Résumé:Abstract The specific concentrations of amprolium in non‐target feed for food‐producing animals, below which there would not be an effect on the emergence of, and/or selection for, resistance in bacteria relevant for human and animal health, as well as the specific antimicrobial concentrations in feed which have an effect in terms of growth promotion/increased yield were assessed by EFSA in collaboration with EMA. Details of the methodology used for this assessment, associated data gaps and uncertainties, are presented in a separate document. To address antimicrobial resistance, the Feed Antimicrobial Resistance Selection Concentration (FARSC) model developed specifically for the assessment was applied. However, due to the lack of data on the parameters required to calculate the FARSC for amprolium, it was not possible to conclude the assessment. To address growth promotion, data from scientific publications obtained from an extensive literature review were used. Levels of amprolium in feed that showed to have an effect on growth promotion/increased yield were reported. The lack of antibacterial activity at clinically relevant concentrations for amprolium suggests that further studies relating to bacterial resistance are not a priority.

Documents similaires