Evaluations of psychosocial cancer support services: A scoping review.

<h4>Background</h4>A diagnosis of cancer leaves most patients with cancer and their relatives with an increased psychological burden. Throughout the course of the illness, social, occupational or legal changes may lead to psychological distress. Psychosocial cancer support services offer...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solveigh P Lingens, Holger Schulz, Christiane Bleich
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/40c498621c6b4b24a80ca3f66219e480
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:40c498621c6b4b24a80ca3f66219e480
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:40c498621c6b4b24a80ca3f66219e4802021-11-25T06:19:20ZEvaluations of psychosocial cancer support services: A scoping review.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0251126https://doaj.org/article/40c498621c6b4b24a80ca3f66219e4802021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251126https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>A diagnosis of cancer leaves most patients with cancer and their relatives with an increased psychological burden. Throughout the course of the illness, social, occupational or legal changes may lead to psychological distress. Psychosocial cancer support services offer psychological, social and legal support. However, little is known about the effectiveness of psychosocial support services implemented in health care. Therefore, this scoping review aims to provide an overview of current literature evaluating out-patient psychosocial support services.<h4>Methods</h4>Databases searched were PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, PsycArticle, Medline, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Embase. Two independent researchers conducted the systematic search. We included studies that were published in English and assessed at least one patient reported outcome measure. Studies that assessed psychotherapy, online support or telephone counselling were excluded. The review was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A search of the databases identified 2104 articles. After excluding duplicates, screening titles, abstracts and full-texts, 12 studies matching the criteria were identified.<h4>Results</h4>One study was an RCT, six were prospective with no control group and five studies were cross-sectional with one measurement point. The most common outcome measures across studies were well-being, concerns and satisfaction with the support services.<h4>Conclusion</h4>While the included studies indicate some improvements to well-being for patients with cancer, the low number and lack of high quality of studies indicate these findings should be interpreted with caution. However, high-quality research on the effectiveness of psychosocial support services is needed to determine that the interventions are effective.Solveigh P LingensHolger SchulzChristiane BleichPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 5, p e0251126 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Solveigh P Lingens
Holger Schulz
Christiane Bleich
Evaluations of psychosocial cancer support services: A scoping review.
description <h4>Background</h4>A diagnosis of cancer leaves most patients with cancer and their relatives with an increased psychological burden. Throughout the course of the illness, social, occupational or legal changes may lead to psychological distress. Psychosocial cancer support services offer psychological, social and legal support. However, little is known about the effectiveness of psychosocial support services implemented in health care. Therefore, this scoping review aims to provide an overview of current literature evaluating out-patient psychosocial support services.<h4>Methods</h4>Databases searched were PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, PsycArticle, Medline, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and Embase. Two independent researchers conducted the systematic search. We included studies that were published in English and assessed at least one patient reported outcome measure. Studies that assessed psychotherapy, online support or telephone counselling were excluded. The review was reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A search of the databases identified 2104 articles. After excluding duplicates, screening titles, abstracts and full-texts, 12 studies matching the criteria were identified.<h4>Results</h4>One study was an RCT, six were prospective with no control group and five studies were cross-sectional with one measurement point. The most common outcome measures across studies were well-being, concerns and satisfaction with the support services.<h4>Conclusion</h4>While the included studies indicate some improvements to well-being for patients with cancer, the low number and lack of high quality of studies indicate these findings should be interpreted with caution. However, high-quality research on the effectiveness of psychosocial support services is needed to determine that the interventions are effective.
format article
author Solveigh P Lingens
Holger Schulz
Christiane Bleich
author_facet Solveigh P Lingens
Holger Schulz
Christiane Bleich
author_sort Solveigh P Lingens
title Evaluations of psychosocial cancer support services: A scoping review.
title_short Evaluations of psychosocial cancer support services: A scoping review.
title_full Evaluations of psychosocial cancer support services: A scoping review.
title_fullStr Evaluations of psychosocial cancer support services: A scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluations of psychosocial cancer support services: A scoping review.
title_sort evaluations of psychosocial cancer support services: a scoping review.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/40c498621c6b4b24a80ca3f66219e480
work_keys_str_mv AT solveighplingens evaluationsofpsychosocialcancersupportservicesascopingreview
AT holgerschulz evaluationsofpsychosocialcancersupportservicesascopingreview
AT christianebleich evaluationsofpsychosocialcancersupportservicesascopingreview
_version_ 1718413858071117824