Accounting for imperfect detection is critical for inferring marine turtle nesting population trends.

Assessments of population trends based on time-series counts of individuals are complicated by imperfect detection, which can lead to serious misinterpretations of data. Population trends of threatened marine turtles worldwide are usually based on counts of nests or nesting females. We analyze 39 ye...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph B Pfaller, Karen A Bjorndal, Milani Chaloupka, Kristina L Williams, Michael G Frick, Alan B Bolten
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/410691ccce594c309ae65077d1f9b4ff
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:410691ccce594c309ae65077d1f9b4ff
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:410691ccce594c309ae65077d1f9b4ff2021-11-18T07:47:58ZAccounting for imperfect detection is critical for inferring marine turtle nesting population trends.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0062326https://doaj.org/article/410691ccce594c309ae65077d1f9b4ff2013-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/23638041/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Assessments of population trends based on time-series counts of individuals are complicated by imperfect detection, which can lead to serious misinterpretations of data. Population trends of threatened marine turtles worldwide are usually based on counts of nests or nesting females. We analyze 39 years of nest-count, female-count, and capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data for nesting loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on Wassaw Island, Georgia, USA. Annual counts of nests and females, not corrected for imperfect detection, yield significant, positive trends in abundance. However, multistate open robust design modeling of CMR data that accounts for changes in imperfect detection reveals that the annual abundance of nesting females has remained essentially constant over the 39-year period. The dichotomy could result from improvements in surveys or increased within-season nest-site fidelity in females, either of which would increase detection probability. For the first time in a marine turtle population, we compare results of population trend analyses that do and do not account for imperfect detection and demonstrate the potential for erroneous conclusions. Past assessments of marine turtle population trends based exclusively on count data should be interpreted with caution and re-evaluated when possible. These concerns apply equally to population assessments of all species with imperfect detection.Joseph B PfallerKaren A BjorndalMilani ChaloupkaKristina L WilliamsMichael G FrickAlan B BoltenPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 4, p e62326 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Joseph B Pfaller
Karen A Bjorndal
Milani Chaloupka
Kristina L Williams
Michael G Frick
Alan B Bolten
Accounting for imperfect detection is critical for inferring marine turtle nesting population trends.
description Assessments of population trends based on time-series counts of individuals are complicated by imperfect detection, which can lead to serious misinterpretations of data. Population trends of threatened marine turtles worldwide are usually based on counts of nests or nesting females. We analyze 39 years of nest-count, female-count, and capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data for nesting loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on Wassaw Island, Georgia, USA. Annual counts of nests and females, not corrected for imperfect detection, yield significant, positive trends in abundance. However, multistate open robust design modeling of CMR data that accounts for changes in imperfect detection reveals that the annual abundance of nesting females has remained essentially constant over the 39-year period. The dichotomy could result from improvements in surveys or increased within-season nest-site fidelity in females, either of which would increase detection probability. For the first time in a marine turtle population, we compare results of population trend analyses that do and do not account for imperfect detection and demonstrate the potential for erroneous conclusions. Past assessments of marine turtle population trends based exclusively on count data should be interpreted with caution and re-evaluated when possible. These concerns apply equally to population assessments of all species with imperfect detection.
format article
author Joseph B Pfaller
Karen A Bjorndal
Milani Chaloupka
Kristina L Williams
Michael G Frick
Alan B Bolten
author_facet Joseph B Pfaller
Karen A Bjorndal
Milani Chaloupka
Kristina L Williams
Michael G Frick
Alan B Bolten
author_sort Joseph B Pfaller
title Accounting for imperfect detection is critical for inferring marine turtle nesting population trends.
title_short Accounting for imperfect detection is critical for inferring marine turtle nesting population trends.
title_full Accounting for imperfect detection is critical for inferring marine turtle nesting population trends.
title_fullStr Accounting for imperfect detection is critical for inferring marine turtle nesting population trends.
title_full_unstemmed Accounting for imperfect detection is critical for inferring marine turtle nesting population trends.
title_sort accounting for imperfect detection is critical for inferring marine turtle nesting population trends.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/410691ccce594c309ae65077d1f9b4ff
work_keys_str_mv AT josephbpfaller accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends
AT karenabjorndal accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends
AT milanichaloupka accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends
AT kristinalwilliams accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends
AT michaelgfrick accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends
AT alanbbolten accountingforimperfectdetectioniscriticalforinferringmarineturtlenestingpopulationtrends
_version_ 1718422906007977984