The Heritage of F.M. Dostoevsky and the Problem of Moral Interpretation of the Dogma of the Trinity in Russian Theology XIX – First Third of XX Century (Article No. 2)

The article is devoted to the theology of F.M. Dostoevsky and specifically to the understanding of the dogma of the Holy Trinity. Dostoevsky understands the undivided unity of the Divine hypostases as a model of perfect interaction among individuals, a norm for social unions, a model for all-united...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Anastasia G. Gacheva
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
RU
Publicado: Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/41073d71fe2549d5a9a0e07255087dcb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:41073d71fe2549d5a9a0e07255087dcb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:41073d71fe2549d5a9a0e07255087dcb2021-12-02T18:43:40ZThe Heritage of F.M. Dostoevsky and the Problem of Moral Interpretation of the Dogma of the Trinity in Russian Theology XIX – First Third of XX Century (Article No. 2)10.22455/2619-0311-2020-2-14-602619-03112712-8512https://doaj.org/article/41073d71fe2549d5a9a0e07255087dcb2020-06-01T00:00:00Zhttp://dostmirkult.ru/images/2020-2/DOST_2020-210-intern-pagine-16-62.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2619-0311https://doaj.org/toc/2712-8512The article is devoted to the theology of F.M. Dostoevsky and specifically to the understanding of the dogma of the Holy Trinity. Dostoevsky understands the undivided unity of the Divine hypostases as a model of perfect interaction among individuals, a norm for social unions, a model for all-united humanity, where the truth of the individual is reconciled with the truth of the whole. The diary fragments of 1864 “Masha lies on the table…” and “Socialism and Christianity” are analyzed from the point of view of Trinitarian problems. The triple unions presented in the writer’s early works are considered in the context of their proximity/distance from the Divine prototype. According to Dostoevsky, when a person goes towards another, addressing him or her as a person, not as a function, it carries the secret of the Trinity within its own life, confessing it not just in words, but in deeds. For the author, the distortion of the Trinity principle is atomicity and dualism; its embodiment is the image of “an expanding family”.Anastasia G. GachevaRussian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literaturearticletheology of f.m. dostoevskythe problem of moral interpretation of the dogma of the trinitydissimilarityindivisibilitylove as a principle of beingtriple unionspersonalitycommunitywholeSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665ENRUДостоевский и мировая культура: Филологический журнал, Iss 2, Pp 14-60 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
RU
topic theology of f.m. dostoevsky
the problem of moral interpretation of the dogma of the trinity
dissimilarity
indivisibility
love as a principle of being
triple unions
personality
community
whole
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
spellingShingle theology of f.m. dostoevsky
the problem of moral interpretation of the dogma of the trinity
dissimilarity
indivisibility
love as a principle of being
triple unions
personality
community
whole
Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages
PG1-9665
Anastasia G. Gacheva
The Heritage of F.M. Dostoevsky and the Problem of Moral Interpretation of the Dogma of the Trinity in Russian Theology XIX – First Third of XX Century (Article No. 2)
description The article is devoted to the theology of F.M. Dostoevsky and specifically to the understanding of the dogma of the Holy Trinity. Dostoevsky understands the undivided unity of the Divine hypostases as a model of perfect interaction among individuals, a norm for social unions, a model for all-united humanity, where the truth of the individual is reconciled with the truth of the whole. The diary fragments of 1864 “Masha lies on the table…” and “Socialism and Christianity” are analyzed from the point of view of Trinitarian problems. The triple unions presented in the writer’s early works are considered in the context of their proximity/distance from the Divine prototype. According to Dostoevsky, when a person goes towards another, addressing him or her as a person, not as a function, it carries the secret of the Trinity within its own life, confessing it not just in words, but in deeds. For the author, the distortion of the Trinity principle is atomicity and dualism; its embodiment is the image of “an expanding family”.
format article
author Anastasia G. Gacheva
author_facet Anastasia G. Gacheva
author_sort Anastasia G. Gacheva
title The Heritage of F.M. Dostoevsky and the Problem of Moral Interpretation of the Dogma of the Trinity in Russian Theology XIX – First Third of XX Century (Article No. 2)
title_short The Heritage of F.M. Dostoevsky and the Problem of Moral Interpretation of the Dogma of the Trinity in Russian Theology XIX – First Third of XX Century (Article No. 2)
title_full The Heritage of F.M. Dostoevsky and the Problem of Moral Interpretation of the Dogma of the Trinity in Russian Theology XIX – First Third of XX Century (Article No. 2)
title_fullStr The Heritage of F.M. Dostoevsky and the Problem of Moral Interpretation of the Dogma of the Trinity in Russian Theology XIX – First Third of XX Century (Article No. 2)
title_full_unstemmed The Heritage of F.M. Dostoevsky and the Problem of Moral Interpretation of the Dogma of the Trinity in Russian Theology XIX – First Third of XX Century (Article No. 2)
title_sort heritage of f.m. dostoevsky and the problem of moral interpretation of the dogma of the trinity in russian theology xix – first third of xx century (article no. 2)
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences. A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/41073d71fe2549d5a9a0e07255087dcb
work_keys_str_mv AT anastasiaggacheva theheritageoffmdostoevskyandtheproblemofmoralinterpretationofthedogmaofthetrinityinrussiantheologyxixfirstthirdofxxcenturyarticleno2
AT anastasiaggacheva heritageoffmdostoevskyandtheproblemofmoralinterpretationofthedogmaofthetrinityinrussiantheologyxixfirstthirdofxxcenturyarticleno2
_version_ 1718377734624772096