Dynamic Capabilities: A Measurement Proposal and its Relationship with Performance

Despite the relevance and growth of research into Dynamic Capabilities, certain gaps and criticisms remain. These issues are primarily related to the measurements of Dynanic Capabilities and its impacts on performance. There is a lack of empirical research that is attempting to investigate the exist...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ivan Lapuente Garrido, Caroline Kretschmer, Silvio Luis de Vasconcellos, Cláudio Reis Gonçalo
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN PT
Publicado:	FUCAPE Business School 2020
Materias:	dynamic capabilities information technology performance scale Business HF5001-6182
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/411ded54c1b047379f3907fa9d5b8ae3
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:411ded54c1b047379f3907fa9d5b8ae3
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:411ded54c1b047379f3907fa9d5b8ae32021-11-11T15:48:08ZDynamic Capabilities: A Measurement Proposal and its Relationship with Performance1807-734X10.15728/bbr.2020.17.1.3https://doaj.org/article/411ded54c1b047379f3907fa9d5b8ae32020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=123062398003https://doaj.org/toc/1807-734XDespite the relevance and growth of research into Dynamic Capabilities, certain gaps and criticisms remain. These issues are primarily related to the measurements of Dynanic Capabilities and its impacts on performance. There is a lack of empirical research that is attempting to investigate the existence, development, and orchestration of Dynamic Capabilities to support superior performance. This paper proposes and validates a scale for the measurement of Dynamic Capabilities based on Teece’s conceptual dimensions (sense, seizing and reconfiguring) through a survey presented in a highly dynamic industry and market, and by investigating the impact on performance. The results, besides validating the scale, showed Teece´s three conceptual dimensions exhibited different behavior in relation to each dimension of performance. Sense and Reconfiguration demonstrated a negative relationship with organizational performance while Seize is positively associated with performance. This may help explain some of the fuzzy results of previous studies that used proxies to measure Dynamic Capabilities.Ivan Lapuente GarridoCaroline KretschmerSilvio Luis de VasconcellosCláudio Reis GonçaloFUCAPE Business Schoolarticledynamic capabilitiesinformation technologyperformancescaleBusinessHF5001-6182ENPTBBR: Brazilian Business Review, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 46-65 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN PT
topic	dynamic capabilities information technology performance scale Business HF5001-6182
spellingShingle	dynamic capabilities information technology performance scale Business HF5001-6182 Ivan Lapuente Garrido Caroline Kretschmer Silvio Luis de Vasconcellos Cláudio Reis Gonçalo Dynamic Capabilities: A Measurement Proposal and its Relationship with Performance
description	Despite the relevance and growth of research into Dynamic Capabilities, certain gaps and criticisms remain. These issues are primarily related to the measurements of Dynanic Capabilities and its impacts on performance. There is a lack of empirical research that is attempting to investigate the existence, development, and orchestration of Dynamic Capabilities to support superior performance. This paper proposes and validates a scale for the measurement of Dynamic Capabilities based on Teece’s conceptual dimensions (sense, seizing and reconfiguring) through a survey presented in a highly dynamic industry and market, and by investigating the impact on performance. The results, besides validating the scale, showed Teece´s three conceptual dimensions exhibited different behavior in relation to each dimension of performance. Sense and Reconfiguration demonstrated a negative relationship with organizational performance while Seize is positively associated with performance. This may help explain some of the fuzzy results of previous studies that used proxies to measure Dynamic Capabilities.
format	article
author	Ivan Lapuente Garrido Caroline Kretschmer Silvio Luis de Vasconcellos Cláudio Reis Gonçalo
author_facet	Ivan Lapuente Garrido Caroline Kretschmer Silvio Luis de Vasconcellos Cláudio Reis Gonçalo
author_sort	Ivan Lapuente Garrido
title	Dynamic Capabilities: A Measurement Proposal and its Relationship with Performance
title_short	Dynamic Capabilities: A Measurement Proposal and its Relationship with Performance
title_full	Dynamic Capabilities: A Measurement Proposal and its Relationship with Performance
title_fullStr	Dynamic Capabilities: A Measurement Proposal and its Relationship with Performance
title_full_unstemmed	Dynamic Capabilities: A Measurement Proposal and its Relationship with Performance
title_sort	dynamic capabilities: a measurement proposal and its relationship with performance
publisher	FUCAPE Business School
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/411ded54c1b047379f3907fa9d5b8ae3
work_keys_str_mv	AT ivanlapuentegarrido dynamiccapabilitiesameasurementproposalanditsrelationshipwithperformance AT carolinekretschmer dynamiccapabilitiesameasurementproposalanditsrelationshipwithperformance AT silvioluisdevasconcellos dynamiccapabilitiesameasurementproposalanditsrelationshipwithperformance AT claudioreisgoncalo dynamiccapabilitiesameasurementproposalanditsrelationshipwithperformance
_version_	1718433885435461632

Dynamic Capabilities: A Measurement Proposal and its Relationship with Performance

Ejemplares similares