Institutional Ontology as an Ontology of Types

In present paper I investigate the relation between types and tokens, and its peculiar relevance for the ontology of institutional phenomena. I distinguish cognitive (or analogical) types and normative (or katalogical) types: while cognitive types are constructed a posteriori from analogies among p...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Lorenzo Passerini Glazel
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR IT
Publicado:	Rosenberg & Sellier 2016
Materias:	social ontology type/token relationship direction of fit atypicalness Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/411fd77a54a046528d593398dc1c5651
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:411fd77a54a046528d593398dc1c5651
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:411fd77a54a046528d593398dc1c56512021-12-02T13:03:28ZInstitutional Ontology as an Ontology of Types10.13128/Phe_Mi-196102280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/411fd77a54a046528d593398dc1c56512016-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7092https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 In present paper I investigate the relation between types and tokens, and its peculiar relevance for the ontology of institutional phenomena. I distinguish cognitive (or analogical) types and normative (or katalogical) types: while cognitive types are constructed a posteriori from analogies among pre-existing tokens, normative types are the prius of their tokens, tokens whose identity and effects are determined in the type. Direction of fit, essential effects, and atypicalness in relation to normative types are investigated, and the hypothesis is ventured that the ontology of institutional phenomena (contrary to the ontology of natural phenomena) is primarily an ontology of types. Lorenzo Passerini GlazelRosenberg & Sellierarticlesocial ontologytype/token relationshipdirection of fitatypicalnessAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 3 (2016)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR IT
topic	social ontology type/token relationship direction of fit atypicalness Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
spellingShingle	social ontology type/token relationship direction of fit atypicalness Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Lorenzo Passerini Glazel Institutional Ontology as an Ontology of Types
description	In present paper I investigate the relation between types and tokens, and its peculiar relevance for the ontology of institutional phenomena. I distinguish cognitive (or analogical) types and normative (or katalogical) types: while cognitive types are constructed a posteriori from analogies among pre-existing tokens, normative types are the prius of their tokens, tokens whose identity and effects are determined in the type. Direction of fit, essential effects, and atypicalness in relation to normative types are investigated, and the hypothesis is ventured that the ontology of institutional phenomena (contrary to the ontology of natural phenomena) is primarily an ontology of types.
format	article
author	Lorenzo Passerini Glazel
author_facet	Lorenzo Passerini Glazel
author_sort	Lorenzo Passerini Glazel
title	Institutional Ontology as an Ontology of Types
title_short	Institutional Ontology as an Ontology of Types
title_full	Institutional Ontology as an Ontology of Types
title_fullStr	Institutional Ontology as an Ontology of Types
title_full_unstemmed	Institutional Ontology as an Ontology of Types
title_sort	institutional ontology as an ontology of types
publisher	Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate	2016
url	https://doaj.org/article/411fd77a54a046528d593398dc1c5651
work_keys_str_mv	AT lorenzopasseriniglazel institutionalontologyasanontologyoftypes
_version_	1718393499280211968

Institutional Ontology as an Ontology of Types

Ejemplares similares