The use of phonetic motor invariants can improve automatic phoneme discrimination.

We investigate the use of phonetic motor invariants (MIs), that is, recurring kinematic patterns of the human phonetic articulators, to improve automatic phoneme discrimination. Using a multi-subject database of synchronized speech and lips/tongue trajectories, we first identify MIs commonly associa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claudio Castellini, Leonardo Badino, Giorgio Metta, Giulio Sandini, Michele Tavella, Mirko Grimaldi, Luciano Fadiga
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/41573dd36f3241e7bca75951cba3e20c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:41573dd36f3241e7bca75951cba3e20c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:41573dd36f3241e7bca75951cba3e20c2021-11-18T06:46:46ZThe use of phonetic motor invariants can improve automatic phoneme discrimination.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0024055https://doaj.org/article/41573dd36f3241e7bca75951cba3e20c2011-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21912661/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203We investigate the use of phonetic motor invariants (MIs), that is, recurring kinematic patterns of the human phonetic articulators, to improve automatic phoneme discrimination. Using a multi-subject database of synchronized speech and lips/tongue trajectories, we first identify MIs commonly associated with bilabial and dental consonants, and use them to simultaneously segment speech and motor signals. We then build a simple neural network-based regression schema (called Audio-Motor Map, AMM) mapping audio features of these segments to the corresponding MIs. Extensive experimental results show that (a) a small set of features extracted from the MIs, as originally gathered from articulatory sensors, are dramatically more effective than a large, state-of-the-art set of audio features, in automatically discriminating bilabials from dentals; (b) the same features, extracted from AMM-reconstructed MIs, are as effective as or better than the audio features, when testing across speakers and coarticulating phonemes; and dramatically better as noise is added to the speech signal. These results seem to support some of the claims of the motor theory of speech perception and add experimental evidence of the actual usefulness of MIs in the more general framework of automated speech recognition.Claudio CastelliniLeonardo BadinoGiorgio MettaGiulio SandiniMichele TavellaMirko GrimaldiLuciano FadigaPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 6, Iss 9, p e24055 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Claudio Castellini
Leonardo Badino
Giorgio Metta
Giulio Sandini
Michele Tavella
Mirko Grimaldi
Luciano Fadiga
The use of phonetic motor invariants can improve automatic phoneme discrimination.
description We investigate the use of phonetic motor invariants (MIs), that is, recurring kinematic patterns of the human phonetic articulators, to improve automatic phoneme discrimination. Using a multi-subject database of synchronized speech and lips/tongue trajectories, we first identify MIs commonly associated with bilabial and dental consonants, and use them to simultaneously segment speech and motor signals. We then build a simple neural network-based regression schema (called Audio-Motor Map, AMM) mapping audio features of these segments to the corresponding MIs. Extensive experimental results show that (a) a small set of features extracted from the MIs, as originally gathered from articulatory sensors, are dramatically more effective than a large, state-of-the-art set of audio features, in automatically discriminating bilabials from dentals; (b) the same features, extracted from AMM-reconstructed MIs, are as effective as or better than the audio features, when testing across speakers and coarticulating phonemes; and dramatically better as noise is added to the speech signal. These results seem to support some of the claims of the motor theory of speech perception and add experimental evidence of the actual usefulness of MIs in the more general framework of automated speech recognition.
format article
author Claudio Castellini
Leonardo Badino
Giorgio Metta
Giulio Sandini
Michele Tavella
Mirko Grimaldi
Luciano Fadiga
author_facet Claudio Castellini
Leonardo Badino
Giorgio Metta
Giulio Sandini
Michele Tavella
Mirko Grimaldi
Luciano Fadiga
author_sort Claudio Castellini
title The use of phonetic motor invariants can improve automatic phoneme discrimination.
title_short The use of phonetic motor invariants can improve automatic phoneme discrimination.
title_full The use of phonetic motor invariants can improve automatic phoneme discrimination.
title_fullStr The use of phonetic motor invariants can improve automatic phoneme discrimination.
title_full_unstemmed The use of phonetic motor invariants can improve automatic phoneme discrimination.
title_sort use of phonetic motor invariants can improve automatic phoneme discrimination.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/41573dd36f3241e7bca75951cba3e20c
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiocastellini theuseofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT leonardobadino theuseofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT giorgiometta theuseofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT giuliosandini theuseofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT micheletavella theuseofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT mirkogrimaldi theuseofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT lucianofadiga theuseofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT claudiocastellini useofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT leonardobadino useofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT giorgiometta useofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT giuliosandini useofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT micheletavella useofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT mirkogrimaldi useofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
AT lucianofadiga useofphoneticmotorinvariantscanimproveautomaticphonemediscrimination
_version_ 1718424409496092672