Pilot study of dogs with suppurative and non-suppurative Malassezia otitis: A case series

Abstract Background Rarely, Malassezia otitis presents as a painful, erosive otitis with an otic discharge containing Malassezia and neutrophils on cytology. There are no published reports of this type of suppurative Malassezia otitis (SMO). The role of Malassezia hypersensitivity in otitis is still...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tania C. Nunes Rodrigues, Sophie I. Vandenabeele
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: BMC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4187f175c99c4c678dcd2d5a70e83166
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4187f175c99c4c678dcd2d5a70e83166
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4187f175c99c4c678dcd2d5a70e831662021-11-21T12:25:53ZPilot study of dogs with suppurative and non-suppurative Malassezia otitis: A case series10.1186/s12917-021-03066-71746-6148https://doaj.org/article/4187f175c99c4c678dcd2d5a70e831662021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-03066-7https://doaj.org/toc/1746-6148Abstract Background Rarely, Malassezia otitis presents as a painful, erosive otitis with an otic discharge containing Malassezia and neutrophils on cytology. There are no published reports of this type of suppurative Malassezia otitis (SMO). The role of Malassezia hypersensitivity in otitis is still unknown, and no association has been demonstrated with SMO. We compared Malassezia IgE levels, intradermal test and histology changes in SMO dogs with the more conventional Malassezia otitis (MO) presentation. Results Three dogs (case 1, case 2 and case 3) were diagnosed with SMO, one dog (case 4) was diagnosed with unilateral MO and unilateral SMO, and one dog (case 5) was diagnosed with MO. Only one case (case 4) with SMO/MO had a positive Intradermal Allergy Test (IDAT) and elevated IgE levels for Malassezia. Histopathology findings from SMO revealed: interface dermatitis (case 1 and 3), lymphocytic dermatitis (case 2) and chronic hyperplastic eosinophilic and lymphoplasmacytic dermatitis (case 4). Histopathology findings from MO showed perivascular dermatitis (case 4 and 5). All the cases were treated successfully. Conclusions SMO presents with a distinct clinical phenotype in comparison with conventional MO. No consistent aetiology could be isolated. In these clinical cases it is possible that previous treatments could have influenced the results. More research is needed to understand the possible aetiologies and the pathogenesis of SMO.Tania C. Nunes RodriguesSophie I. VandenabeeleBMCarticleMalasseziahypersensitivitysuppurativeotitisinflammationcanineVeterinary medicineSF600-1100ENBMC Veterinary Research, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Malassezia
hypersensitivity
suppurative
otitis
inflammation
canine
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
spellingShingle Malassezia
hypersensitivity
suppurative
otitis
inflammation
canine
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Tania C. Nunes Rodrigues
Sophie I. Vandenabeele
Pilot study of dogs with suppurative and non-suppurative Malassezia otitis: A case series
description Abstract Background Rarely, Malassezia otitis presents as a painful, erosive otitis with an otic discharge containing Malassezia and neutrophils on cytology. There are no published reports of this type of suppurative Malassezia otitis (SMO). The role of Malassezia hypersensitivity in otitis is still unknown, and no association has been demonstrated with SMO. We compared Malassezia IgE levels, intradermal test and histology changes in SMO dogs with the more conventional Malassezia otitis (MO) presentation. Results Three dogs (case 1, case 2 and case 3) were diagnosed with SMO, one dog (case 4) was diagnosed with unilateral MO and unilateral SMO, and one dog (case 5) was diagnosed with MO. Only one case (case 4) with SMO/MO had a positive Intradermal Allergy Test (IDAT) and elevated IgE levels for Malassezia. Histopathology findings from SMO revealed: interface dermatitis (case 1 and 3), lymphocytic dermatitis (case 2) and chronic hyperplastic eosinophilic and lymphoplasmacytic dermatitis (case 4). Histopathology findings from MO showed perivascular dermatitis (case 4 and 5). All the cases were treated successfully. Conclusions SMO presents with a distinct clinical phenotype in comparison with conventional MO. No consistent aetiology could be isolated. In these clinical cases it is possible that previous treatments could have influenced the results. More research is needed to understand the possible aetiologies and the pathogenesis of SMO.
format article
author Tania C. Nunes Rodrigues
Sophie I. Vandenabeele
author_facet Tania C. Nunes Rodrigues
Sophie I. Vandenabeele
author_sort Tania C. Nunes Rodrigues
title Pilot study of dogs with suppurative and non-suppurative Malassezia otitis: A case series
title_short Pilot study of dogs with suppurative and non-suppurative Malassezia otitis: A case series
title_full Pilot study of dogs with suppurative and non-suppurative Malassezia otitis: A case series
title_fullStr Pilot study of dogs with suppurative and non-suppurative Malassezia otitis: A case series
title_full_unstemmed Pilot study of dogs with suppurative and non-suppurative Malassezia otitis: A case series
title_sort pilot study of dogs with suppurative and non-suppurative malassezia otitis: a case series
publisher BMC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4187f175c99c4c678dcd2d5a70e83166
work_keys_str_mv AT taniacnunesrodrigues pilotstudyofdogswithsuppurativeandnonsuppurativemalasseziaotitisacaseseries
AT sophieivandenabeele pilotstudyofdogswithsuppurativeandnonsuppurativemalasseziaotitisacaseseries
_version_ 1718419002189938688