A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function

Bryndon B Hatch1, Majid Moshirfar1, Andrew J Ollerton1, Shameema Sikder2, Mark D Mifflin11John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USAPurpose: To compare differences in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatch BB, Moshirfar M, Ollerton AJ, Sikder S, Mifflin MD
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4206cae986d84c569fd13691e2d31b29
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4206cae986d84c569fd13691e2d31b29
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4206cae986d84c569fd13691e2d31b292021-12-02T04:12:43ZA prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function1177-54671177-5483https://doaj.org/article/4206cae986d84c569fd13691e2d31b292011-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/a-prospective-contralateral-comparison-of-photorefractive-keratectomy--a7207https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5467https://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Bryndon B Hatch1, Majid Moshirfar1, Andrew J Ollerton1, Shameema Sikder2, Mark D Mifflin11John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USAPurpose: To compare differences in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, complications, and higher-order ocular aberrations (HOAs) in eyes with stable myopia undergoing either photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or thin-flap laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (intended flap thickness of 90 µm) using the VISX Star S4 CustomVue excimer laser and the IntraLase FS60 femtosecond laser at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.Methods: In this prospective, masked, and randomized pilot study, refractive surgery was performed contralaterally on 52 eyes: 26 with PRK and 26 with thin-flap LASIK. Primary outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity, and complications.Results: At 6 months, mean values for UDVA (logMAR) were -0.043 ± 0.668 and -0.061 ± 0.099 in the PRK and thin-flap LASIK groups, respectively (n = 25, P = 0.466). UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved in 96% of eyes undergoing PRK and 92% of eyes undergoing thin-flap LASIK, whereas 20/15 vision or better was achieved in 73% of eyes undergoing PRK and 72% of eyes undergoing thin-flap LASIK (P > 0.600). Significant differences were not found between treatment groups in contrast sensitivity (P ≥ 0.156) or CDVA (P = 0.800) at postoperative 6 months. Types of complications differed between groups, notably 35% of eyes in the thin-flap LASIK group experiencing complications, including microstriae and 2 flap tears.Conclusion: Under well-controlled surgical conditions, PRK and thin-flap LASIK refractive surgeries achieve similar results in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and induction of HOAs, with differences in experienced complications.Keywords: photorefractive keratectomy, thin-flap LASIK, visual function Hatch BBMoshirfar MOllerton AJSikder SMifflin MDDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2011, Iss default, Pp 451-457 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Hatch BB
Moshirfar M
Ollerton AJ
Sikder S
Mifflin MD
A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function
description Bryndon B Hatch1, Majid Moshirfar1, Andrew J Ollerton1, Shameema Sikder2, Mark D Mifflin11John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; 2Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USAPurpose: To compare differences in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, complications, and higher-order ocular aberrations (HOAs) in eyes with stable myopia undergoing either photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or thin-flap laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (intended flap thickness of 90 µm) using the VISX Star S4 CustomVue excimer laser and the IntraLase FS60 femtosecond laser at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.Methods: In this prospective, masked, and randomized pilot study, refractive surgery was performed contralaterally on 52 eyes: 26 with PRK and 26 with thin-flap LASIK. Primary outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity, and complications.Results: At 6 months, mean values for UDVA (logMAR) were -0.043 ± 0.668 and -0.061 ± 0.099 in the PRK and thin-flap LASIK groups, respectively (n = 25, P = 0.466). UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved in 96% of eyes undergoing PRK and 92% of eyes undergoing thin-flap LASIK, whereas 20/15 vision or better was achieved in 73% of eyes undergoing PRK and 72% of eyes undergoing thin-flap LASIK (P > 0.600). Significant differences were not found between treatment groups in contrast sensitivity (P ≥ 0.156) or CDVA (P = 0.800) at postoperative 6 months. Types of complications differed between groups, notably 35% of eyes in the thin-flap LASIK group experiencing complications, including microstriae and 2 flap tears.Conclusion: Under well-controlled surgical conditions, PRK and thin-flap LASIK refractive surgeries achieve similar results in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and induction of HOAs, with differences in experienced complications.Keywords: photorefractive keratectomy, thin-flap LASIK, visual function
format article
author Hatch BB
Moshirfar M
Ollerton AJ
Sikder S
Mifflin MD
author_facet Hatch BB
Moshirfar M
Ollerton AJ
Sikder S
Mifflin MD
author_sort Hatch BB
title A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function
title_short A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function
title_full A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function
title_fullStr A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function
title_full_unstemmed A prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) versus thin-flap LASIK: assessment of visual function
title_sort prospective, contralateral comparison of photorefractive keratectomy (prk) versus thin-flap lasik: assessment of visual function
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/4206cae986d84c569fd13691e2d31b29
work_keys_str_mv AT hatchbb aprospectivecontralateralcomparisonofphotorefractivekeratectomyprkversusthinflaplasikassessmentofvisualfunction
AT moshirfarm aprospectivecontralateralcomparisonofphotorefractivekeratectomyprkversusthinflaplasikassessmentofvisualfunction
AT ollertonaj aprospectivecontralateralcomparisonofphotorefractivekeratectomyprkversusthinflaplasikassessmentofvisualfunction
AT sikders aprospectivecontralateralcomparisonofphotorefractivekeratectomyprkversusthinflaplasikassessmentofvisualfunction
AT mifflinmd aprospectivecontralateralcomparisonofphotorefractivekeratectomyprkversusthinflaplasikassessmentofvisualfunction
AT hatchbb prospectivecontralateralcomparisonofphotorefractivekeratectomyprkversusthinflaplasikassessmentofvisualfunction
AT moshirfarm prospectivecontralateralcomparisonofphotorefractivekeratectomyprkversusthinflaplasikassessmentofvisualfunction
AT ollertonaj prospectivecontralateralcomparisonofphotorefractivekeratectomyprkversusthinflaplasikassessmentofvisualfunction
AT sikders prospectivecontralateralcomparisonofphotorefractivekeratectomyprkversusthinflaplasikassessmentofvisualfunction
AT mifflinmd prospectivecontralateralcomparisonofphotorefractivekeratectomyprkversusthinflaplasikassessmentofvisualfunction
_version_ 1718401363555123200