Individual differences in working memory capacity are unrelated to the magnitudes of retrocue benefits

Abstract Previous studies have associated visual working memory (VWM) capacity with the use of internal attention. Retrocues, which direct internal attention to a particular object or feature dimension, can improve VWM performance (i.e., retrocue benefit, RCB). However, so far, no study has investig...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaoxiong Ye, Qianru Xu, Xinyang Liu, Piia Astikainen, Yongjie Zhu, Zhonghua Hu, Qiang Liu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/428cee0f500f421791e8363eef71719b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:428cee0f500f421791e8363eef71719b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:428cee0f500f421791e8363eef71719b2021-12-02T14:25:32ZIndividual differences in working memory capacity are unrelated to the magnitudes of retrocue benefits10.1038/s41598-021-86515-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/428cee0f500f421791e8363eef71719b2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86515-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Previous studies have associated visual working memory (VWM) capacity with the use of internal attention. Retrocues, which direct internal attention to a particular object or feature dimension, can improve VWM performance (i.e., retrocue benefit, RCB). However, so far, no study has investigated the relationship between VWM capacity and the magnitudes of RCBs obtained from object-based and dimension-based retrocues. The present study explored individual differences in the magnitudes of object- and dimension-based RCBs and their relationships with VWM capacity. Participants completed a VWM capacity measurement, an object-based cue task, and a dimension-based cue task. We confirmed that both object- and dimension-based retrocues could improve VWM performance. We also found a significant positive correlation between the magnitudes of object- and dimension-based RCB indexes, suggesting a partly overlapping mechanism between the use of object- and dimension-based retrocues. However, our results provided no evidence for a correlation between VWM capacity and the magnitudes of the object- or dimension-based RCBs. Although inadequate attention control is usually assumed to be associated with VWM capacity, the results suggest that the internal attention mechanism for using retrocues in VWM retention is independent of VWM capacity.Chaoxiong YeQianru XuXinyang LiuPiia AstikainenYongjie ZhuZhonghua HuQiang LiuNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Chaoxiong Ye
Qianru Xu
Xinyang Liu
Piia Astikainen
Yongjie Zhu
Zhonghua Hu
Qiang Liu
Individual differences in working memory capacity are unrelated to the magnitudes of retrocue benefits
description Abstract Previous studies have associated visual working memory (VWM) capacity with the use of internal attention. Retrocues, which direct internal attention to a particular object or feature dimension, can improve VWM performance (i.e., retrocue benefit, RCB). However, so far, no study has investigated the relationship between VWM capacity and the magnitudes of RCBs obtained from object-based and dimension-based retrocues. The present study explored individual differences in the magnitudes of object- and dimension-based RCBs and their relationships with VWM capacity. Participants completed a VWM capacity measurement, an object-based cue task, and a dimension-based cue task. We confirmed that both object- and dimension-based retrocues could improve VWM performance. We also found a significant positive correlation between the magnitudes of object- and dimension-based RCB indexes, suggesting a partly overlapping mechanism between the use of object- and dimension-based retrocues. However, our results provided no evidence for a correlation between VWM capacity and the magnitudes of the object- or dimension-based RCBs. Although inadequate attention control is usually assumed to be associated with VWM capacity, the results suggest that the internal attention mechanism for using retrocues in VWM retention is independent of VWM capacity.
format article
author Chaoxiong Ye
Qianru Xu
Xinyang Liu
Piia Astikainen
Yongjie Zhu
Zhonghua Hu
Qiang Liu
author_facet Chaoxiong Ye
Qianru Xu
Xinyang Liu
Piia Astikainen
Yongjie Zhu
Zhonghua Hu
Qiang Liu
author_sort Chaoxiong Ye
title Individual differences in working memory capacity are unrelated to the magnitudes of retrocue benefits
title_short Individual differences in working memory capacity are unrelated to the magnitudes of retrocue benefits
title_full Individual differences in working memory capacity are unrelated to the magnitudes of retrocue benefits
title_fullStr Individual differences in working memory capacity are unrelated to the magnitudes of retrocue benefits
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in working memory capacity are unrelated to the magnitudes of retrocue benefits
title_sort individual differences in working memory capacity are unrelated to the magnitudes of retrocue benefits
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/428cee0f500f421791e8363eef71719b
work_keys_str_mv AT chaoxiongye individualdifferencesinworkingmemorycapacityareunrelatedtothemagnitudesofretrocuebenefits
AT qianruxu individualdifferencesinworkingmemorycapacityareunrelatedtothemagnitudesofretrocuebenefits
AT xinyangliu individualdifferencesinworkingmemorycapacityareunrelatedtothemagnitudesofretrocuebenefits
AT piiaastikainen individualdifferencesinworkingmemorycapacityareunrelatedtothemagnitudesofretrocuebenefits
AT yongjiezhu individualdifferencesinworkingmemorycapacityareunrelatedtothemagnitudesofretrocuebenefits
AT zhonghuahu individualdifferencesinworkingmemorycapacityareunrelatedtothemagnitudesofretrocuebenefits
AT qiangliu individualdifferencesinworkingmemorycapacityareunrelatedtothemagnitudesofretrocuebenefits
_version_ 1718391363418980352