Veertig jaar universitaire filosofie in Nederland: van pluralisme naar 'normal philosophy'

Although for a long time, Dutch academic philosophy was characterized by a pluralism of – imported – philosophical frameworks and paradigms, in more recent decades, a type of ‘normal philosophy’, in the Kuhnian sense, has become dominant which aims to solve ethical and political problems and dilemma...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Karen Vintges
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN NL
Publicado:	University of Groningen Press 2020
Materias:	normal philosophy critical philosophy identity politics right- and lift-wing populism the journal krisis (history of) philosophy in the netherlands Social Sciences H Political science (General) JA1-92 Philosophy (General) B1-5802
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/434a4fc35ea0477e838fb5693f05da6d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:434a4fc35ea0477e838fb5693f05da6d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:434a4fc35ea0477e838fb5693f05da6d2021-12-02T17:09:53ZVeertig jaar universitaire filosofie in Nederland: van pluralisme naar 'normal philosophy'1875-710310.21827/krisis.40.1.36964https://doaj.org/article/434a4fc35ea0477e838fb5693f05da6d2020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://krisis.eu/article/view/36964https://doaj.org/toc/1875-7103Although for a long time, Dutch academic philosophy was characterized by a pluralism of – imported – philosophical frameworks and paradigms, in more recent decades, a type of ‘normal philosophy’, in the Kuhnian sense, has become dominant which aims to solve ethical and political problems and dilemmas through rational-normative argumentation. Contrary to what is often claimed, the new 'normal philosophy' amounts not to thinking ‘beyond the analytic-continental divide’ in a fruitful synthesis, but to the subsumption of continental philosophical themes and concepts under the analytic tradition. The potentially critical tenor of continental philosophy threatens to be ‘solved’ by this subsumption. ‘Normal philosophy’, with its emphasis on rational-normative argumentation, risks leading to a state philosophy that fits in with existing policy questions, ignoring systemic and structural power inequalities. I argue that the journal Krisis, in keeping with its original principles, should hang on to critical philosophical reflection, which today is needed more than ever, specifically – pace current right-wing and left-wing populist attacks on identity politics – on systemic, multiple forms of deprivation and oppression.Karen VintgesUniversity of Groningen Pressarticlenormal philosophycritical philosophyidentity politicsright- and lift-wing populismthe journal krisis(history of) philosophy in the netherlandsSocial SciencesHPolitical science (General)JA1-92Philosophy (General)B1-5802ENNLKrisis, Vol 40, Iss 1, Pp 9-25 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN NL
topic	normal philosophy critical philosophy identity politics right- and lift-wing populism the journal krisis (history of) philosophy in the netherlands Social Sciences H Political science (General) JA1-92 Philosophy (General) B1-5802
spellingShingle	normal philosophy critical philosophy identity politics right- and lift-wing populism the journal krisis (history of) philosophy in the netherlands Social Sciences H Political science (General) JA1-92 Philosophy (General) B1-5802 Karen Vintges Veertig jaar universitaire filosofie in Nederland: van pluralisme naar 'normal philosophy'
description	Although for a long time, Dutch academic philosophy was characterized by a pluralism of – imported – philosophical frameworks and paradigms, in more recent decades, a type of ‘normal philosophy’, in the Kuhnian sense, has become dominant which aims to solve ethical and political problems and dilemmas through rational-normative argumentation. Contrary to what is often claimed, the new 'normal philosophy' amounts not to thinking ‘beyond the analytic-continental divide’ in a fruitful synthesis, but to the subsumption of continental philosophical themes and concepts under the analytic tradition. The potentially critical tenor of continental philosophy threatens to be ‘solved’ by this subsumption. ‘Normal philosophy’, with its emphasis on rational-normative argumentation, risks leading to a state philosophy that fits in with existing policy questions, ignoring systemic and structural power inequalities. I argue that the journal Krisis, in keeping with its original principles, should hang on to critical philosophical reflection, which today is needed more than ever, specifically – pace current right-wing and left-wing populist attacks on identity politics – on systemic, multiple forms of deprivation and oppression.
format	article
author	Karen Vintges
author_facet	Karen Vintges
author_sort	Karen Vintges
title	Veertig jaar universitaire filosofie in Nederland: van pluralisme naar 'normal philosophy'
title_short	Veertig jaar universitaire filosofie in Nederland: van pluralisme naar 'normal philosophy'
title_full	Veertig jaar universitaire filosofie in Nederland: van pluralisme naar 'normal philosophy'
title_fullStr	Veertig jaar universitaire filosofie in Nederland: van pluralisme naar 'normal philosophy'
title_full_unstemmed	Veertig jaar universitaire filosofie in Nederland: van pluralisme naar 'normal philosophy'
title_sort	veertig jaar universitaire filosofie in nederland: van pluralisme naar 'normal philosophy'
publisher	University of Groningen Press
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/434a4fc35ea0477e838fb5693f05da6d
work_keys_str_mv	AT karenvintges veertigjaaruniversitairefilosofieinnederlandvanpluralismenaarnormalphilosophy
_version_	1718381493586231296

Veertig jaar universitaire filosofie in Nederland: van pluralisme naar 'normal philosophy'

Ejemplares similares