New Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists Among Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis: Prognostic Impact

Background: Atrial arrhythmia (AA) is common among patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA), who have an increased risk of intracardiac thrombus. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic impact of vitamin K-antagonists (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with CA.Methods...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eve Cariou, Kevin Sanchis, Khailène Rguez, Virginie Blanchard, Stephanie Cazalbou, Pauline Fournier, Antoine Huart, Murielle Roussel, Pascal Cintas, Michel Galinier, Didier Carrié, Philippe Maury, Yoan Lavie-Badie, Olivier Lairez
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/435fa4c4080545f590084dc89085847d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:435fa4c4080545f590084dc89085847d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:435fa4c4080545f590084dc89085847d2021-12-01T20:15:49ZNew Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists Among Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis: Prognostic Impact2297-055X10.3389/fcvm.2021.742428https://doaj.org/article/435fa4c4080545f590084dc89085847d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.742428/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2297-055XBackground: Atrial arrhythmia (AA) is common among patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA), who have an increased risk of intracardiac thrombus. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic impact of vitamin K-antagonists (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with CA.Methods and Results: 273 patients with CA and history of AA with long term anticoagulation−69 (25%) light chain amyloidosis (AL), 179 (66%) wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) and 25 (9%) variant transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv)–were retrospectively included between January 2012 and July 2020. 147 (54%) and 126 (46%) patients received VKA and DOAC, respectively. Patient receiving VKA were more likely to have AL with renal dysfunction, higher NT-proBNP and troponin levels. Patients with ATTRwt were more likely to receive DOAC therapy. There were more bleeding complications among patients with VKA (20 versus 10%; P = 0.013) but no difference for stroke events (4 vs. 2%; P = 0.223), as compared to patients with DOAC. A total of 124 (45%) patients met the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality: 96 (65%) and 28 (22%) among patients with VKAs and DOACs, respectively (P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis including age and renal function, VKA was no longer associated with all-cause mortality.Conclusion: Among patients with CA and history of AA receiving oral anticoagulant, DOACs appear to be at least as effective and safe as VKAs.Eve CariouEve CariouKevin SanchisKevin SanchisKhailène RguezKhailène RguezVirginie BlanchardVirginie BlanchardVirginie BlanchardVirginie BlanchardStephanie CazalbouStephanie CazalbouPauline FournierPauline FournierAntoine HuartMurielle RousselPascal CintasMichel GalinierMichel GalinierMichel GalinierDidier CarriéDidier CarriéDidier CarriéPhilippe MauryPhilippe MauryYoan Lavie-BadieYoan Lavie-BadieYoan Lavie-BadieYoan Lavie-BadieOlivier LairezOlivier LairezOlivier LairezOlivier LairezFrontiers Media S.A.articlecardiac amyloidosisdirect oral anticoagulantsvitamin K-antagonists (VKAs)prognosisatrial arrhythmiaDiseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) systemRC666-701ENFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Vol 8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic cardiac amyloidosis
direct oral anticoagulants
vitamin K-antagonists (VKAs)
prognosis
atrial arrhythmia
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
spellingShingle cardiac amyloidosis
direct oral anticoagulants
vitamin K-antagonists (VKAs)
prognosis
atrial arrhythmia
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
RC666-701
Eve Cariou
Eve Cariou
Kevin Sanchis
Kevin Sanchis
Khailène Rguez
Khailène Rguez
Virginie Blanchard
Virginie Blanchard
Virginie Blanchard
Virginie Blanchard
Stephanie Cazalbou
Stephanie Cazalbou
Pauline Fournier
Pauline Fournier
Antoine Huart
Murielle Roussel
Pascal Cintas
Michel Galinier
Michel Galinier
Michel Galinier
Didier Carrié
Didier Carrié
Didier Carrié
Philippe Maury
Philippe Maury
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Olivier Lairez
Olivier Lairez
Olivier Lairez
Olivier Lairez
New Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists Among Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis: Prognostic Impact
description Background: Atrial arrhythmia (AA) is common among patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA), who have an increased risk of intracardiac thrombus. The aim of this study was to explore the prognostic impact of vitamin K-antagonists (VKA) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with CA.Methods and Results: 273 patients with CA and history of AA with long term anticoagulation−69 (25%) light chain amyloidosis (AL), 179 (66%) wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRwt) and 25 (9%) variant transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv)–were retrospectively included between January 2012 and July 2020. 147 (54%) and 126 (46%) patients received VKA and DOAC, respectively. Patient receiving VKA were more likely to have AL with renal dysfunction, higher NT-proBNP and troponin levels. Patients with ATTRwt were more likely to receive DOAC therapy. There were more bleeding complications among patients with VKA (20 versus 10%; P = 0.013) but no difference for stroke events (4 vs. 2%; P = 0.223), as compared to patients with DOAC. A total of 124 (45%) patients met the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality: 96 (65%) and 28 (22%) among patients with VKAs and DOACs, respectively (P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis including age and renal function, VKA was no longer associated with all-cause mortality.Conclusion: Among patients with CA and history of AA receiving oral anticoagulant, DOACs appear to be at least as effective and safe as VKAs.
format article
author Eve Cariou
Eve Cariou
Kevin Sanchis
Kevin Sanchis
Khailène Rguez
Khailène Rguez
Virginie Blanchard
Virginie Blanchard
Virginie Blanchard
Virginie Blanchard
Stephanie Cazalbou
Stephanie Cazalbou
Pauline Fournier
Pauline Fournier
Antoine Huart
Murielle Roussel
Pascal Cintas
Michel Galinier
Michel Galinier
Michel Galinier
Didier Carrié
Didier Carrié
Didier Carrié
Philippe Maury
Philippe Maury
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Olivier Lairez
Olivier Lairez
Olivier Lairez
Olivier Lairez
author_facet Eve Cariou
Eve Cariou
Kevin Sanchis
Kevin Sanchis
Khailène Rguez
Khailène Rguez
Virginie Blanchard
Virginie Blanchard
Virginie Blanchard
Virginie Blanchard
Stephanie Cazalbou
Stephanie Cazalbou
Pauline Fournier
Pauline Fournier
Antoine Huart
Murielle Roussel
Pascal Cintas
Michel Galinier
Michel Galinier
Michel Galinier
Didier Carrié
Didier Carrié
Didier Carrié
Philippe Maury
Philippe Maury
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Yoan Lavie-Badie
Olivier Lairez
Olivier Lairez
Olivier Lairez
Olivier Lairez
author_sort Eve Cariou
title New Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists Among Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis: Prognostic Impact
title_short New Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists Among Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis: Prognostic Impact
title_full New Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists Among Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis: Prognostic Impact
title_fullStr New Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists Among Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis: Prognostic Impact
title_full_unstemmed New Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists Among Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis: Prognostic Impact
title_sort new oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin k antagonists among patients with cardiac amyloidosis: prognostic impact
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/435fa4c4080545f590084dc89085847d
work_keys_str_mv AT evecariou neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT evecariou neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT kevinsanchis neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT kevinsanchis neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT khailenerguez neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT khailenerguez neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT virginieblanchard neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT virginieblanchard neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT virginieblanchard neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT virginieblanchard neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT stephaniecazalbou neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT stephaniecazalbou neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT paulinefournier neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT paulinefournier neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT antoinehuart neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT murielleroussel neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT pascalcintas neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT michelgalinier neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT michelgalinier neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT michelgalinier neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT didiercarrie neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT didiercarrie neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT didiercarrie neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT philippemaury neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT philippemaury neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT yoanlaviebadie neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT yoanlaviebadie neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT yoanlaviebadie neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT yoanlaviebadie neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT olivierlairez neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT olivierlairez neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT olivierlairez neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
AT olivierlairez neworalanticoagulantsvsvitaminkantagonistsamongpatientswithcardiacamyloidosisprognosticimpact
_version_ 1718404569933807616