Neverland or Tomorrowland? Addressing (In)compatibility among the SDG Pillars in Europe

The 2015–2030 agenda framed Sustainable Development as a Universal venture. This decision has a great historic significance as it encompasses building a better future for the whole of humanity, enrolling the millions who have been denied the chance to live a decent, dignified and fulfilling life and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joana Costa, Diana Cancela, João Reis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
HDI
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/438c94b4e21143e1b0012fa3ce719410
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:438c94b4e21143e1b0012fa3ce719410
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:438c94b4e21143e1b0012fa3ce7194102021-11-25T17:48:59ZNeverland or Tomorrowland? Addressing (In)compatibility among the SDG Pillars in Europe10.3390/ijerph1822118581660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/438c94b4e21143e1b0012fa3ce7194102021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/11858https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601The 2015–2030 agenda framed Sustainable Development as a Universal venture. This decision has a great historic significance as it encompasses building a better future for the whole of humanity, enrolling the millions who have been denied the chance to live a decent, dignified and fulfilling life and to achieve their potential. For the first time, an entire generation will have the chance to succeed in ending poverty while being the last to have a chance of saving the planet. The world will be a better place in 2030 if humanity succeeds in this journey. However, there is hovering skepticism around the feasibility of this accomplishment. The article aims to empirically test the (in)compatibilities among these objectives even for developed economies such as the European Union countries, demonstrating that unless solid bridges are built promoting innovative networks at a transnational level, welfare and prosperity among those ecosystems will be compromised. The results show that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) pillars have heterogeneous determinants, which are to some extent incompatible. Moreover, policy makers need to further reinforce multi-country compensations if the environment is to be preserved.Joana CostaDiana CancelaJoão ReisMDPI AGarticleSDGslogit panel dataSDG pillarsinnovation ecosystemsHDIentrepreneurial initiativeMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11858, p 11858 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic SDGs
logit panel data
SDG pillars
innovation ecosystems
HDI
entrepreneurial initiative
Medicine
R
spellingShingle SDGs
logit panel data
SDG pillars
innovation ecosystems
HDI
entrepreneurial initiative
Medicine
R
Joana Costa
Diana Cancela
João Reis
Neverland or Tomorrowland? Addressing (In)compatibility among the SDG Pillars in Europe
description The 2015–2030 agenda framed Sustainable Development as a Universal venture. This decision has a great historic significance as it encompasses building a better future for the whole of humanity, enrolling the millions who have been denied the chance to live a decent, dignified and fulfilling life and to achieve their potential. For the first time, an entire generation will have the chance to succeed in ending poverty while being the last to have a chance of saving the planet. The world will be a better place in 2030 if humanity succeeds in this journey. However, there is hovering skepticism around the feasibility of this accomplishment. The article aims to empirically test the (in)compatibilities among these objectives even for developed economies such as the European Union countries, demonstrating that unless solid bridges are built promoting innovative networks at a transnational level, welfare and prosperity among those ecosystems will be compromised. The results show that the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) pillars have heterogeneous determinants, which are to some extent incompatible. Moreover, policy makers need to further reinforce multi-country compensations if the environment is to be preserved.
format article
author Joana Costa
Diana Cancela
João Reis
author_facet Joana Costa
Diana Cancela
João Reis
author_sort Joana Costa
title Neverland or Tomorrowland? Addressing (In)compatibility among the SDG Pillars in Europe
title_short Neverland or Tomorrowland? Addressing (In)compatibility among the SDG Pillars in Europe
title_full Neverland or Tomorrowland? Addressing (In)compatibility among the SDG Pillars in Europe
title_fullStr Neverland or Tomorrowland? Addressing (In)compatibility among the SDG Pillars in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Neverland or Tomorrowland? Addressing (In)compatibility among the SDG Pillars in Europe
title_sort neverland or tomorrowland? addressing (in)compatibility among the sdg pillars in europe
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/438c94b4e21143e1b0012fa3ce719410
work_keys_str_mv AT joanacosta neverlandortomorrowlandaddressingincompatibilityamongthesdgpillarsineurope
AT dianacancela neverlandortomorrowlandaddressingincompatibilityamongthesdgpillarsineurope
AT joaoreis neverlandortomorrowlandaddressingincompatibilityamongthesdgpillarsineurope
_version_ 1718411979777900544