Prognostic relevance of the TNM classification 8th edition and new criteria of staging for retroperitoneal liposarcoma

For the first time a section appeared for staging of non-organ retroperitoneal tumors in the UICC TNM classification 8th edition. Aim.To assess the prognostic significance of the TNM classification eighth edition for the most common retroperitoneal tumors-liposarcoma. Materials and methods.The...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: S. N. Nered, A. Yu. Volkov, N. А. Kozlov, I. S. Stilidi, P. P. Archery
Formato: article
Lenguaje:RU
Publicado: IP Habib O.N. 2020
Materias:
tnm
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/439365f98fc246999c39720ad94e8a6b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:439365f98fc246999c39720ad94e8a6b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:439365f98fc246999c39720ad94e8a6b2021-11-30T17:03:34ZPrognostic relevance of the TNM classification 8th edition and new criteria of staging for retroperitoneal liposarcoma1815-14341815-144210.26442/18151434.2020.3.200220https://doaj.org/article/439365f98fc246999c39720ad94e8a6b2020-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://modernonco.orscience.ru/1815-1434/article/viewFile/52596/36041https://doaj.org/toc/1815-1434https://doaj.org/toc/1815-1442For the first time a section appeared for staging of non-organ retroperitoneal tumors in the UICC TNM classification 8th edition. Aim.To assess the prognostic significance of the TNM classification eighth edition for the most common retroperitoneal tumors-liposarcoma. Materials and methods.The distribution of patients by stages and survival in accordance with the TNM-8 classification were studied in192 patients with retroperitoneal non-organ liposarcoma (RLPS). Results.In the TNM-8 classification, only the degree of malignancy of the tumor has a prognostic value, and the T-category does not reflect the actual size of the RLPS and is considered T4 in 93%, which leads to inadequate staging. During the 15-year period, there were no cases with stages II and IIIA, and the survival rate was estimated only in patients with stages I and IIIB. A TNM classification with new values of the T-category was proposed, which demonstrated a more adequate distribution of patients by stages and the reliability ofintergroup differences in the survival rate. Conclusion.It is advisable to create a special TNM classification for RLPS, which makes up more than half of all retroperitoneal sarcomas.S. N. NeredA. Yu. VolkovN. А. KozlovI. S. StilidiP. P. ArcheryIP Habib O.N.articleretroperitoneal tumorsclassificationliposarcomatnmstagingretroperitoneal liposarcomaNeoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogensRC254-282RUСовременная онкология, Vol 22, Iss 3, Pp 120-126 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language RU
topic retroperitoneal tumors
classification
liposarcoma
tnm
staging
retroperitoneal liposarcoma
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
spellingShingle retroperitoneal tumors
classification
liposarcoma
tnm
staging
retroperitoneal liposarcoma
Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens
RC254-282
S. N. Nered
A. Yu. Volkov
N. А. Kozlov
I. S. Stilidi
P. P. Archery
Prognostic relevance of the TNM classification 8th edition and new criteria of staging for retroperitoneal liposarcoma
description For the first time a section appeared for staging of non-organ retroperitoneal tumors in the UICC TNM classification 8th edition. Aim.To assess the prognostic significance of the TNM classification eighth edition for the most common retroperitoneal tumors-liposarcoma. Materials and methods.The distribution of patients by stages and survival in accordance with the TNM-8 classification were studied in192 patients with retroperitoneal non-organ liposarcoma (RLPS). Results.In the TNM-8 classification, only the degree of malignancy of the tumor has a prognostic value, and the T-category does not reflect the actual size of the RLPS and is considered T4 in 93%, which leads to inadequate staging. During the 15-year period, there were no cases with stages II and IIIA, and the survival rate was estimated only in patients with stages I and IIIB. A TNM classification with new values of the T-category was proposed, which demonstrated a more adequate distribution of patients by stages and the reliability ofintergroup differences in the survival rate. Conclusion.It is advisable to create a special TNM classification for RLPS, which makes up more than half of all retroperitoneal sarcomas.
format article
author S. N. Nered
A. Yu. Volkov
N. А. Kozlov
I. S. Stilidi
P. P. Archery
author_facet S. N. Nered
A. Yu. Volkov
N. А. Kozlov
I. S. Stilidi
P. P. Archery
author_sort S. N. Nered
title Prognostic relevance of the TNM classification 8th edition and new criteria of staging for retroperitoneal liposarcoma
title_short Prognostic relevance of the TNM classification 8th edition and new criteria of staging for retroperitoneal liposarcoma
title_full Prognostic relevance of the TNM classification 8th edition and new criteria of staging for retroperitoneal liposarcoma
title_fullStr Prognostic relevance of the TNM classification 8th edition and new criteria of staging for retroperitoneal liposarcoma
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic relevance of the TNM classification 8th edition and new criteria of staging for retroperitoneal liposarcoma
title_sort prognostic relevance of the tnm classification 8th edition and new criteria of staging for retroperitoneal liposarcoma
publisher IP Habib O.N.
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/439365f98fc246999c39720ad94e8a6b
work_keys_str_mv AT snnered prognosticrelevanceofthetnmclassification8theditionandnewcriteriaofstagingforretroperitonealliposarcoma
AT ayuvolkov prognosticrelevanceofthetnmclassification8theditionandnewcriteriaofstagingforretroperitonealliposarcoma
AT nakozlov prognosticrelevanceofthetnmclassification8theditionandnewcriteriaofstagingforretroperitonealliposarcoma
AT isstilidi prognosticrelevanceofthetnmclassification8theditionandnewcriteriaofstagingforretroperitonealliposarcoma
AT pparchery prognosticrelevanceofthetnmclassification8theditionandnewcriteriaofstagingforretroperitonealliposarcoma
_version_ 1718406374216433664