A systematic critical appraisal for non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis using the appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation II instrument.

Clinical practice CPGs (CPGs) have been developed to summarize evidence related to the management of osteoarthritis (OA). CPGs facilitate uptake of evidence-based knowledge by consumers, health professionals, health administrators and policy makers. The objectives of the present review were: 1) to a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lucie Brosseau, Prinon Rahman, Karine Toupin-April, Stéphane Poitras, Judy King, Gino De Angelis, Laurianne Loew, Lynn Casimiro, Gail Paterson, Jessica McEwan
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/43a3f6d5c47243b5ba399b4f0d5de9f1
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:43a3f6d5c47243b5ba399b4f0d5de9f1
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:43a3f6d5c47243b5ba399b4f0d5de9f12021-11-18T08:38:05ZA systematic critical appraisal for non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis using the appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation II instrument.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0082986https://doaj.org/article/43a3f6d5c47243b5ba399b4f0d5de9f12014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24427268/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Clinical practice CPGs (CPGs) have been developed to summarize evidence related to the management of osteoarthritis (OA). CPGs facilitate uptake of evidence-based knowledge by consumers, health professionals, health administrators and policy makers. The objectives of the present review were: 1) to assess the quality of the CPGs on non-pharmacological management of OA; using a standardized and validated instrument--the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool--by three pairs of trained appraisers; and 2) to summarize the recommendations based on only high-quality existing CPGs. Scientific literature databases from 2001 to 2013 were systematically searched for the state of evidence, with 17 CPGs for OA being identified. Most CPGs effectively addressed only a minority of AGREE II domains. Scope and purpose was effectively addressed in 10 CPGs on the management of OA, stakeholder involvement in 12 CPGs, rigour of development in 10 CPGs, clarity/presentation in 17 CPGs, editorial independence in 2 CPGs, and applicability in none of the OA CPGs. The overall quality of the included CPGs, according to the 7-point AGREE II scoring system, is 4.8 ± 0.41 for OA. Therapeutic exercises, patient education, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, acupuncture, orthoses and insoles, heat and cryotherapy, patellar tapping, and weight control are commonly recommended for the non-pharmacological management of OA by the high-quality CPGs. The general clinical management recommendations tended to be similar among high-quality CPGs, although interventions addressed varied. Non-pharmacological management interventions were superficially addressed in more than half of the selected CPGs. For CPGs to be standardized uniform creators should use the AGREE II criteria when developing CPGs. Innovative and effective methods of CPG implementation to users are needed to ultimately enhance the quality of life of arthritic individuals.Lucie BrosseauPrinon RahmanKarine Toupin-AprilStéphane PoitrasJudy KingGino De AngelisLaurianne LoewLynn CasimiroGail PatersonJessica McEwanPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 1, p e82986 (2014)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Lucie Brosseau Prinon Rahman Karine Toupin-April Stéphane Poitras Judy King Gino De Angelis Laurianne Loew Lynn Casimiro Gail Paterson Jessica McEwan A systematic critical appraisal for non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis using the appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation II instrument.
description	Clinical practice CPGs (CPGs) have been developed to summarize evidence related to the management of osteoarthritis (OA). CPGs facilitate uptake of evidence-based knowledge by consumers, health professionals, health administrators and policy makers. The objectives of the present review were: 1) to assess the quality of the CPGs on non-pharmacological management of OA; using a standardized and validated instrument--the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool--by three pairs of trained appraisers; and 2) to summarize the recommendations based on only high-quality existing CPGs. Scientific literature databases from 2001 to 2013 were systematically searched for the state of evidence, with 17 CPGs for OA being identified. Most CPGs effectively addressed only a minority of AGREE II domains. Scope and purpose was effectively addressed in 10 CPGs on the management of OA, stakeholder involvement in 12 CPGs, rigour of development in 10 CPGs, clarity/presentation in 17 CPGs, editorial independence in 2 CPGs, and applicability in none of the OA CPGs. The overall quality of the included CPGs, according to the 7-point AGREE II scoring system, is 4.8 ± 0.41 for OA. Therapeutic exercises, patient education, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, acupuncture, orthoses and insoles, heat and cryotherapy, patellar tapping, and weight control are commonly recommended for the non-pharmacological management of OA by the high-quality CPGs. The general clinical management recommendations tended to be similar among high-quality CPGs, although interventions addressed varied. Non-pharmacological management interventions were superficially addressed in more than half of the selected CPGs. For CPGs to be standardized uniform creators should use the AGREE II criteria when developing CPGs. Innovative and effective methods of CPG implementation to users are needed to ultimately enhance the quality of life of arthritic individuals.
format	article
author	Lucie Brosseau Prinon Rahman Karine Toupin-April Stéphane Poitras Judy King Gino De Angelis Laurianne Loew Lynn Casimiro Gail Paterson Jessica McEwan
author_facet	Lucie Brosseau Prinon Rahman Karine Toupin-April Stéphane Poitras Judy King Gino De Angelis Laurianne Loew Lynn Casimiro Gail Paterson Jessica McEwan
author_sort	Lucie Brosseau
title	A systematic critical appraisal for non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis using the appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation II instrument.
title_short	A systematic critical appraisal for non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis using the appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation II instrument.
title_full	A systematic critical appraisal for non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis using the appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation II instrument.
title_fullStr	A systematic critical appraisal for non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis using the appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation II instrument.
title_full_unstemmed	A systematic critical appraisal for non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis using the appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation II instrument.
title_sort	systematic critical appraisal for non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis using the appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation ii instrument.
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2014
url	https://doaj.org/article/43a3f6d5c47243b5ba399b4f0d5de9f1
work_keys_str_mv	AT luciebrosseau asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT prinonrahman asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT karinetoupinapril asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT stephanepoitras asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT judyking asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT ginodeangelis asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT laurianneloew asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT lynncasimiro asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT gailpaterson asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT jessicamcewan asystematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT luciebrosseau systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT prinonrahman systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT karinetoupinapril systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT stephanepoitras systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT judyking systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT ginodeangelis systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT laurianneloew systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT lynncasimiro systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT gailpaterson systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument AT jessicamcewan systematiccriticalappraisalfornonpharmacologicalmanagementofosteoarthritisusingtheappraisalofguidelinesresearchandevaluationiiinstrument
_version_	1718421496957763584

A systematic critical appraisal for non-pharmacological management of osteoarthritis using the appraisal of guidelines research and evaluation II instrument.

Ejemplares similares