The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks

Abstract The Pawnee M5.8 earthquake is the largest event in Oklahoma instrument recorded history. It occurred near the edge of active seismic zones, similar to other M5+ earthquakes since 2011. It ruptured a previously unmapped fault and triggered aftershocks along a complex conjugate fault system....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiaowei Chen, Nori Nakata, Colin Pennington, Jackson Haffener, Jefferson C. Chang, Xiaohui He, Zhongwen Zhan, Sidao Ni, Jacob I. Walter
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/43a52922a6ce45f1813de86bfbe8ef84
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:43a52922a6ce45f1813de86bfbe8ef84
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:43a52922a6ce45f1813de86bfbe8ef842021-12-02T16:05:59ZThe Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks10.1038/s41598-017-04992-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/43a52922a6ce45f1813de86bfbe8ef842017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04992-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The Pawnee M5.8 earthquake is the largest event in Oklahoma instrument recorded history. It occurred near the edge of active seismic zones, similar to other M5+ earthquakes since 2011. It ruptured a previously unmapped fault and triggered aftershocks along a complex conjugate fault system. With a high-resolution earthquake catalog, we observe propagating foreshocks leading to the mainshock within 0.5 km distance, suggesting existence of precursory aseismic slip. At approximately 100 days before the mainshock, two M ≥ 3.5 earthquakes occurred along a mapped fault that is conjugate to the mainshock fault. At about 40 days before, two earthquakes clusters started, with one M3 earthquake occurred two days before the mainshock. The three M ≥ 3 foreshocks all produced positive Coulomb stress at the mainshock hypocenter. These foreshock activities within the conjugate fault system are near-instantaneously responding to variations in injection rates at 95% confidence. The short time delay between injection and seismicity differs from both the hypothetical expected time scale of diffusion process and the long time delay observed in this region prior to 2016, suggesting a possible role of elastic stress transfer and critical stress state of the fault. Our results suggest that the Pawnee earthquake is a result of interplay among injection, tectonic faults, and foreshocks.Xiaowei ChenNori NakataColin PenningtonJackson HaffenerJefferson C. ChangXiaohui HeZhongwen ZhanSidao NiJacob I. WalterNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-18 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Xiaowei Chen
Nori Nakata
Colin Pennington
Jackson Haffener
Jefferson C. Chang
Xiaohui He
Zhongwen Zhan
Sidao Ni
Jacob I. Walter
The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks
description Abstract The Pawnee M5.8 earthquake is the largest event in Oklahoma instrument recorded history. It occurred near the edge of active seismic zones, similar to other M5+ earthquakes since 2011. It ruptured a previously unmapped fault and triggered aftershocks along a complex conjugate fault system. With a high-resolution earthquake catalog, we observe propagating foreshocks leading to the mainshock within 0.5 km distance, suggesting existence of precursory aseismic slip. At approximately 100 days before the mainshock, two M ≥ 3.5 earthquakes occurred along a mapped fault that is conjugate to the mainshock fault. At about 40 days before, two earthquakes clusters started, with one M3 earthquake occurred two days before the mainshock. The three M ≥ 3 foreshocks all produced positive Coulomb stress at the mainshock hypocenter. These foreshock activities within the conjugate fault system are near-instantaneously responding to variations in injection rates at 95% confidence. The short time delay between injection and seismicity differs from both the hypothetical expected time scale of diffusion process and the long time delay observed in this region prior to 2016, suggesting a possible role of elastic stress transfer and critical stress state of the fault. Our results suggest that the Pawnee earthquake is a result of interplay among injection, tectonic faults, and foreshocks.
format article
author Xiaowei Chen
Nori Nakata
Colin Pennington
Jackson Haffener
Jefferson C. Chang
Xiaohui He
Zhongwen Zhan
Sidao Ni
Jacob I. Walter
author_facet Xiaowei Chen
Nori Nakata
Colin Pennington
Jackson Haffener
Jefferson C. Chang
Xiaohui He
Zhongwen Zhan
Sidao Ni
Jacob I. Walter
author_sort Xiaowei Chen
title The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks
title_short The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks
title_full The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks
title_fullStr The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks
title_full_unstemmed The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks
title_sort pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/43a52922a6ce45f1813de86bfbe8ef84
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoweichen thepawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT norinakata thepawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT colinpennington thepawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT jacksonhaffener thepawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT jeffersoncchang thepawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT xiaohuihe thepawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT zhongwenzhan thepawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT sidaoni thepawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT jacobiwalter thepawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT xiaoweichen pawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT norinakata pawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT colinpennington pawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT jacksonhaffener pawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT jeffersoncchang pawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT xiaohuihe pawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT zhongwenzhan pawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT sidaoni pawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
AT jacobiwalter pawneeearthquakeasaresultoftheinterplayamonginjectionfaultsandforeshocks
_version_ 1718385142851960832