Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study

Background: Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease where delay in diagnosis or treatment can lead to deformities and disabilities for the rest of the patient’s life. Definite diagnosis of leprosy has long been based on clinical picture, histopathology and/or the detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB)...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nehal Mostafa kamel, Osama Hashem, Hassan Khodair, Hesham Abd El-Samee
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta) 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/43bf84eb3be845a3ace45a10235db84c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:43bf84eb3be845a3ace45a10235db84c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:43bf84eb3be845a3ace45a10235db84c2021-12-02T14:02:00ZPolymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study2636-41742682-378010.21608/ijma.2020.30181.1126https://doaj.org/article/43bf84eb3be845a3ace45a10235db84c2020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/article_95155_df7d2591321b063515d1b1a18de449c3.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2636-4174https://doaj.org/toc/2682-3780Background: Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease where delay in diagnosis or treatment can lead to deformities and disabilities for the rest of the patient’s life. Definite diagnosis of leprosy has long been based on clinical picture, histopathology and/or the detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) from tissue smears or tissue sections stained by Ziehl-Neelsen.  Aim of the work: We evaluatedin this study, the usefulness of PCR for detection of M.leprae in the serum, as less invasive technique, in comparison to skin slit smear  for the diagnosis of  leprosy. Patients and Methods:This study included 30 non-treated patients of leprosy (9 multibacillary, 21 paucibacillary) skin slit smears had been taken. In addition, serum samples had been collected for polymerase chain reaction [PCR] test. Results: Negative Slit Skin Smear for AFB had been obtained in 20 cases with a rate of positivity of 33%. Serum PCR was positive in 20 patients giving an overall rate of positivity of 67% which confirm the diagnosis in 11 out of 20 cases with slit skin smear [SSS] negative. Conclusion: PCR does show to be more sensitive than slit skin smear [SSS] indicating its future use for diagnostic purposes especially in early leprosy cases.Nehal Mostafa kamelOsama HashemHassan KhodairHesham Abd El-SameeAl-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)articleleprosypolymerase chain reactionslit skin smearmycobacterium lepraeacid-fast bacilliMedicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Medical Arts, Vol 2, Iss 3, Pp 650-654 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic leprosy
polymerase chain reaction
slit skin smear
mycobacterium leprae
acid-fast bacilli
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle leprosy
polymerase chain reaction
slit skin smear
mycobacterium leprae
acid-fast bacilli
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Nehal Mostafa kamel
Osama Hashem
Hassan Khodair
Hesham Abd El-Samee
Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study
description Background: Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease where delay in diagnosis or treatment can lead to deformities and disabilities for the rest of the patient’s life. Definite diagnosis of leprosy has long been based on clinical picture, histopathology and/or the detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) from tissue smears or tissue sections stained by Ziehl-Neelsen.  Aim of the work: We evaluatedin this study, the usefulness of PCR for detection of M.leprae in the serum, as less invasive technique, in comparison to skin slit smear  for the diagnosis of  leprosy. Patients and Methods:This study included 30 non-treated patients of leprosy (9 multibacillary, 21 paucibacillary) skin slit smears had been taken. In addition, serum samples had been collected for polymerase chain reaction [PCR] test. Results: Negative Slit Skin Smear for AFB had been obtained in 20 cases with a rate of positivity of 33%. Serum PCR was positive in 20 patients giving an overall rate of positivity of 67% which confirm the diagnosis in 11 out of 20 cases with slit skin smear [SSS] negative. Conclusion: PCR does show to be more sensitive than slit skin smear [SSS] indicating its future use for diagnostic purposes especially in early leprosy cases.
format article
author Nehal Mostafa kamel
Osama Hashem
Hassan Khodair
Hesham Abd El-Samee
author_facet Nehal Mostafa kamel
Osama Hashem
Hassan Khodair
Hesham Abd El-Samee
author_sort Nehal Mostafa kamel
title Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study
title_short Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study
title_full Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study
title_fullStr Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study
title_sort polymerase chain reaction versus slit skin smear in diagnosis of leprosy; a cross sectional study
publisher Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/43bf84eb3be845a3ace45a10235db84c
work_keys_str_mv AT nehalmostafakamel polymerasechainreactionversusslitskinsmearindiagnosisofleprosyacrosssectionalstudy
AT osamahashem polymerasechainreactionversusslitskinsmearindiagnosisofleprosyacrosssectionalstudy
AT hassankhodair polymerasechainreactionversusslitskinsmearindiagnosisofleprosyacrosssectionalstudy
AT heshamabdelsamee polymerasechainreactionversusslitskinsmearindiagnosisofleprosyacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1718392075089608704