Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study
Background: Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease where delay in diagnosis or treatment can lead to deformities and disabilities for the rest of the patient’s life. Definite diagnosis of leprosy has long been based on clinical picture, histopathology and/or the detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB)...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/43bf84eb3be845a3ace45a10235db84c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:43bf84eb3be845a3ace45a10235db84c |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:43bf84eb3be845a3ace45a10235db84c2021-12-02T14:02:00ZPolymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study2636-41742682-378010.21608/ijma.2020.30181.1126https://doaj.org/article/43bf84eb3be845a3ace45a10235db84c2020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ijma.journals.ekb.eg/article_95155_df7d2591321b063515d1b1a18de449c3.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2636-4174https://doaj.org/toc/2682-3780Background: Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease where delay in diagnosis or treatment can lead to deformities and disabilities for the rest of the patient’s life. Definite diagnosis of leprosy has long been based on clinical picture, histopathology and/or the detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) from tissue smears or tissue sections stained by Ziehl-Neelsen. Aim of the work: We evaluatedin this study, the usefulness of PCR for detection of M.leprae in the serum, as less invasive technique, in comparison to skin slit smear for the diagnosis of leprosy. Patients and Methods:This study included 30 non-treated patients of leprosy (9 multibacillary, 21 paucibacillary) skin slit smears had been taken. In addition, serum samples had been collected for polymerase chain reaction [PCR] test. Results: Negative Slit Skin Smear for AFB had been obtained in 20 cases with a rate of positivity of 33%. Serum PCR was positive in 20 patients giving an overall rate of positivity of 67% which confirm the diagnosis in 11 out of 20 cases with slit skin smear [SSS] negative. Conclusion: PCR does show to be more sensitive than slit skin smear [SSS] indicating its future use for diagnostic purposes especially in early leprosy cases.Nehal Mostafa kamelOsama HashemHassan KhodairHesham Abd El-SameeAl-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta)articleleprosypolymerase chain reactionslit skin smearmycobacterium lepraeacid-fast bacilliMedicine (General)R5-920ENInternational Journal of Medical Arts, Vol 2, Iss 3, Pp 650-654 (2020) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
leprosy polymerase chain reaction slit skin smear mycobacterium leprae acid-fast bacilli Medicine (General) R5-920 |
spellingShingle |
leprosy polymerase chain reaction slit skin smear mycobacterium leprae acid-fast bacilli Medicine (General) R5-920 Nehal Mostafa kamel Osama Hashem Hassan Khodair Hesham Abd El-Samee Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study |
description |
Background: Leprosy is a chronic infectious disease where delay in diagnosis or treatment can lead to deformities and disabilities for the rest of the patient’s life. Definite diagnosis of leprosy has long been based on clinical picture, histopathology and/or the detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) from tissue smears or tissue sections stained by Ziehl-Neelsen. Aim of the work: We evaluatedin this study, the usefulness of PCR for detection of M.leprae in the serum, as less invasive technique, in comparison to skin slit smear for the diagnosis of leprosy. Patients and Methods:This study included 30 non-treated patients of leprosy (9 multibacillary, 21 paucibacillary) skin slit smears had been taken. In addition, serum samples had been collected for polymerase chain reaction [PCR] test. Results: Negative Slit Skin Smear for AFB had been obtained in 20 cases with a rate of positivity of 33%. Serum PCR was positive in 20 patients giving an overall rate of positivity of 67% which confirm the diagnosis in 11 out of 20 cases with slit skin smear [SSS] negative. Conclusion: PCR does show to be more sensitive than slit skin smear [SSS] indicating its future use for diagnostic purposes especially in early leprosy cases. |
format |
article |
author |
Nehal Mostafa kamel Osama Hashem Hassan Khodair Hesham Abd El-Samee |
author_facet |
Nehal Mostafa kamel Osama Hashem Hassan Khodair Hesham Abd El-Samee |
author_sort |
Nehal Mostafa kamel |
title |
Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study |
title_short |
Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study |
title_full |
Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study |
title_fullStr |
Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Polymerase Chain Reaction versus Slit Skin Smear in Diagnosis of Leprosy; A Cross Sectional Study |
title_sort |
polymerase chain reaction versus slit skin smear in diagnosis of leprosy; a cross sectional study |
publisher |
Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Medicine (Damietta) |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/43bf84eb3be845a3ace45a10235db84c |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nehalmostafakamel polymerasechainreactionversusslitskinsmearindiagnosisofleprosyacrosssectionalstudy AT osamahashem polymerasechainreactionversusslitskinsmearindiagnosisofleprosyacrosssectionalstudy AT hassankhodair polymerasechainreactionversusslitskinsmearindiagnosisofleprosyacrosssectionalstudy AT heshamabdelsamee polymerasechainreactionversusslitskinsmearindiagnosisofleprosyacrosssectionalstudy |
_version_ |
1718392075089608704 |