A tale of two statues: Contemporary conflict reporting constraints and the Battle of Baghdad

Although television conflict reporting has usually been limited by risks to journalists’ safety, the death throes of Baathist Iraq in April 2003 provided viewers with a unique opportunity to vicariously witness the fall of a large modern city.  Yet if the iconic moment of the Second Gulf War came w...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stephen Ellmers
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Asia Pacific Network 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/44075965d30e4673b0c1534fe8d43688
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:44075965d30e4673b0c1534fe8d43688
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:44075965d30e4673b0c1534fe8d436882021-12-02T13:03:19ZA tale of two statues: Contemporary conflict reporting constraints and the Battle of Baghdad10.24135/pjr.v24i1.471023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/44075965d30e4673b0c1534fe8d436882018-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/47https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035 Although television conflict reporting has usually been limited by risks to journalists’ safety, the death throes of Baathist Iraq in April 2003 provided viewers with a unique opportunity to vicariously witness the fall of a large modern city.  Yet if the iconic moment of the Second Gulf War came when Saddam Hussein’s statue in Firdos Square was toppled, then it was at the expense of another image event which unfolded earlier a short distance away.  Because the US military’s violent destruction of the equestrian statue close to the ‘Hands of Victory’ monument better encapsulates the conflict than the sterile bloodless ‘cakewalk’ description it’s usually labelled with.  This article shows how the tale of these two statues is also in some ways the tale of two Fox News correspondents, and how an alienation from military service conditions and methods can leave reporters and their audiences with no sense of what the participants on their screens endured in order to reach Baghdad; or what they had also inflicted upon others. In retrospect, the circumstances which allowed one Fox reporter to provide the world with what might have been its first taste of live, unedited combat footage seem more like an accidental success than the result of systemic best practices. Especially when this network and even its most credible host remain committed to ensuring a particular partisan perspective dominates all their broadcasts. Stephen EllmersAsia Pacific Networkarticlebest practicecombat footagecombat reportingIraqmilitaryOperation Iraqi FreedomCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 24, Iss 1 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic best practice
combat footage
combat reporting
Iraq
military
Operation Iraqi Freedom
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
spellingShingle best practice
combat footage
combat reporting
Iraq
military
Operation Iraqi Freedom
Communication. Mass media
P87-96
Journalism. The periodical press, etc.
PN4699-5650
Stephen Ellmers
A tale of two statues: Contemporary conflict reporting constraints and the Battle of Baghdad
description Although television conflict reporting has usually been limited by risks to journalists’ safety, the death throes of Baathist Iraq in April 2003 provided viewers with a unique opportunity to vicariously witness the fall of a large modern city.  Yet if the iconic moment of the Second Gulf War came when Saddam Hussein’s statue in Firdos Square was toppled, then it was at the expense of another image event which unfolded earlier a short distance away.  Because the US military’s violent destruction of the equestrian statue close to the ‘Hands of Victory’ monument better encapsulates the conflict than the sterile bloodless ‘cakewalk’ description it’s usually labelled with.  This article shows how the tale of these two statues is also in some ways the tale of two Fox News correspondents, and how an alienation from military service conditions and methods can leave reporters and their audiences with no sense of what the participants on their screens endured in order to reach Baghdad; or what they had also inflicted upon others. In retrospect, the circumstances which allowed one Fox reporter to provide the world with what might have been its first taste of live, unedited combat footage seem more like an accidental success than the result of systemic best practices. Especially when this network and even its most credible host remain committed to ensuring a particular partisan perspective dominates all their broadcasts.
format article
author Stephen Ellmers
author_facet Stephen Ellmers
author_sort Stephen Ellmers
title A tale of two statues: Contemporary conflict reporting constraints and the Battle of Baghdad
title_short A tale of two statues: Contemporary conflict reporting constraints and the Battle of Baghdad
title_full A tale of two statues: Contemporary conflict reporting constraints and the Battle of Baghdad
title_fullStr A tale of two statues: Contemporary conflict reporting constraints and the Battle of Baghdad
title_full_unstemmed A tale of two statues: Contemporary conflict reporting constraints and the Battle of Baghdad
title_sort tale of two statues: contemporary conflict reporting constraints and the battle of baghdad
publisher Asia Pacific Network
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/44075965d30e4673b0c1534fe8d43688
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenellmers ataleoftwostatuescontemporaryconflictreportingconstraintsandthebattleofbaghdad
AT stephenellmers taleoftwostatuescontemporaryconflictreportingconstraintsandthebattleofbaghdad
_version_ 1718393499823374336