A comparison of regionalization methods in monsoon dominated tropical river basins

The present study evaluated five regionalization methods: global averaging; regression; spatial proximity; behavioral similarity and artificial neural network (ANN) for Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), using data from 24 river basins in monsoon dominated tropical river basins of peninsular Ind...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pramod Soni, Shivam Tripathi, Rajesh Srivastava
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/442aadd09bd94cf29fb0a86f0e59c6c9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:442aadd09bd94cf29fb0a86f0e59c6c9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:442aadd09bd94cf29fb0a86f0e59c6c92021-11-05T19:02:16ZA comparison of regionalization methods in monsoon dominated tropical river basins2040-22442408-935410.2166/wcc.2021.298https://doaj.org/article/442aadd09bd94cf29fb0a86f0e59c6c92021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jwcc.iwaponline.com/content/12/5/1975https://doaj.org/toc/2040-2244https://doaj.org/toc/2408-9354The present study evaluated five regionalization methods: global averaging; regression; spatial proximity; behavioral similarity and artificial neural network (ANN) for Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), using data from 24 river basins in monsoon dominated tropical river basins of peninsular India. Regionalization was performed for each basin using the remaining 23 basins. The performance of the calibration and thus the regionalization method is limited by the unreliable or erroneous data at the basins. Overall, we found that the regression method outperforms other regionalization methods in terms of predicting the daily as well as peak discharges. It was found that despite showing a better R2 in training, testing and validation, the ANN method performed poorly probably due to a lower number of training data. Therefore, it is suggested that the ANN should be avoided for regionalization in the absence of sufficient training data. Moreover, the regression equations developed in the present study can be utilized to predict SWAT parameters of basins located in the vicinity of the study area. However, the basins located far away from the group of catchments or having diverse characteristics should be avoided for regionalization. HIGHLIGHTS Overall, the regression-based method showed comparatively better performance both in terms of precision and accuracy.; Simpler regression methods are better than complex ANNs when the number of gauged basins are limited.; The performance of the regionalization method is limited by the unreliable or erroneous data at the basin.;Pramod SoniShivam TripathiRajesh SrivastavaIWA Publishingarticlehydrologyregionalizationtropical river basinsungauged basinsEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENJournal of Water and Climate Change, Vol 12, Iss 5, Pp 1975-1996 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic hydrology
regionalization
tropical river basins
ungauged basins
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle hydrology
regionalization
tropical river basins
ungauged basins
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Pramod Soni
Shivam Tripathi
Rajesh Srivastava
A comparison of regionalization methods in monsoon dominated tropical river basins
description The present study evaluated five regionalization methods: global averaging; regression; spatial proximity; behavioral similarity and artificial neural network (ANN) for Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), using data from 24 river basins in monsoon dominated tropical river basins of peninsular India. Regionalization was performed for each basin using the remaining 23 basins. The performance of the calibration and thus the regionalization method is limited by the unreliable or erroneous data at the basins. Overall, we found that the regression method outperforms other regionalization methods in terms of predicting the daily as well as peak discharges. It was found that despite showing a better R2 in training, testing and validation, the ANN method performed poorly probably due to a lower number of training data. Therefore, it is suggested that the ANN should be avoided for regionalization in the absence of sufficient training data. Moreover, the regression equations developed in the present study can be utilized to predict SWAT parameters of basins located in the vicinity of the study area. However, the basins located far away from the group of catchments or having diverse characteristics should be avoided for regionalization. HIGHLIGHTS Overall, the regression-based method showed comparatively better performance both in terms of precision and accuracy.; Simpler regression methods are better than complex ANNs when the number of gauged basins are limited.; The performance of the regionalization method is limited by the unreliable or erroneous data at the basin.;
format article
author Pramod Soni
Shivam Tripathi
Rajesh Srivastava
author_facet Pramod Soni
Shivam Tripathi
Rajesh Srivastava
author_sort Pramod Soni
title A comparison of regionalization methods in monsoon dominated tropical river basins
title_short A comparison of regionalization methods in monsoon dominated tropical river basins
title_full A comparison of regionalization methods in monsoon dominated tropical river basins
title_fullStr A comparison of regionalization methods in monsoon dominated tropical river basins
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of regionalization methods in monsoon dominated tropical river basins
title_sort comparison of regionalization methods in monsoon dominated tropical river basins
publisher IWA Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/442aadd09bd94cf29fb0a86f0e59c6c9
work_keys_str_mv AT pramodsoni acomparisonofregionalizationmethodsinmonsoondominatedtropicalriverbasins
AT shivamtripathi acomparisonofregionalizationmethodsinmonsoondominatedtropicalriverbasins
AT rajeshsrivastava acomparisonofregionalizationmethodsinmonsoondominatedtropicalriverbasins
AT pramodsoni comparisonofregionalizationmethodsinmonsoondominatedtropicalriverbasins
AT shivamtripathi comparisonofregionalizationmethodsinmonsoondominatedtropicalriverbasins
AT rajeshsrivastava comparisonofregionalizationmethodsinmonsoondominatedtropicalriverbasins
_version_ 1718444034539651072