Recreating Historic European Spindle Spinning

Spinning is a vital step in the production of textiles, whereby fibres are drawn out (drafted) and twisted together to make thread. In the present day, several culturally unique types of spinning are recognised, such as the thigh-rolling technique of traditional Navajo spinners who use unusually lar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mary Ann Megan Cleaton, Alice Rose Evans, Jane Hunt, Cathelina di Alessandri
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: EXARC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4443735e85b44a309cac00b7cf4b63e0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4443735e85b44a309cac00b7cf4b63e0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4443735e85b44a309cac00b7cf4b63e02021-12-01T14:42:35ZRecreating Historic European Spindle Spinning2212-8956https://doaj.org/article/4443735e85b44a309cac00b7cf4b63e02021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://exarc.net/ark:/88735/10582https://doaj.org/toc/2212-8956Spinning is a vital step in the production of textiles, whereby fibres are drawn out (drafted) and twisted together to make thread. In the present day, several culturally unique types of spinning are recognised, such as the thigh-rolling technique of traditional Navajo spinners who use unusually large spindles in a supported style (Wolf Creek, 2009). However, the default way of spinning with a spindle, particularly to Westerners, is usually considered to be “drop spinning”. Both modern recreationists and academics carrying out experimental archaeology typically either a) simply practice “drop spinning” without critically appraising their technique or b) consider the type(s) of spindle spinning practiced in Europe historically to be variant(s) of “drop spinning”. Additionally, they typically consider the distaff to be a flax-specific tool and often assert that wool was spun without a distaff. In contrast, we feel strongly that imagery showing European spindle spinning between circa 1100 and 1800 AD does not support these assertions. Additionally, we find that reproduction historical European spindles and whorls are poorly adapted for use with the “drop spinning” technique. These points led us to explore an alternative interpretation of the pictorial evidence and assess the practicality of this interpretation.Mary Ann Megan CleatonAlice Rose EvansJane HuntCathelina di AlessandriEXARCarticlespinningearly middle ageslate middle agesnewer eraMuseums. Collectors and collectingAM1-501ArchaeologyCC1-960ENEXARC Journal, Iss 2021/2 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic spinning
early middle ages
late middle ages
newer era
Museums. Collectors and collecting
AM1-501
Archaeology
CC1-960
spellingShingle spinning
early middle ages
late middle ages
newer era
Museums. Collectors and collecting
AM1-501
Archaeology
CC1-960
Mary Ann Megan Cleaton
Alice Rose Evans
Jane Hunt
Cathelina di Alessandri
Recreating Historic European Spindle Spinning
description Spinning is a vital step in the production of textiles, whereby fibres are drawn out (drafted) and twisted together to make thread. In the present day, several culturally unique types of spinning are recognised, such as the thigh-rolling technique of traditional Navajo spinners who use unusually large spindles in a supported style (Wolf Creek, 2009). However, the default way of spinning with a spindle, particularly to Westerners, is usually considered to be “drop spinning”. Both modern recreationists and academics carrying out experimental archaeology typically either a) simply practice “drop spinning” without critically appraising their technique or b) consider the type(s) of spindle spinning practiced in Europe historically to be variant(s) of “drop spinning”. Additionally, they typically consider the distaff to be a flax-specific tool and often assert that wool was spun without a distaff. In contrast, we feel strongly that imagery showing European spindle spinning between circa 1100 and 1800 AD does not support these assertions. Additionally, we find that reproduction historical European spindles and whorls are poorly adapted for use with the “drop spinning” technique. These points led us to explore an alternative interpretation of the pictorial evidence and assess the practicality of this interpretation.
format article
author Mary Ann Megan Cleaton
Alice Rose Evans
Jane Hunt
Cathelina di Alessandri
author_facet Mary Ann Megan Cleaton
Alice Rose Evans
Jane Hunt
Cathelina di Alessandri
author_sort Mary Ann Megan Cleaton
title Recreating Historic European Spindle Spinning
title_short Recreating Historic European Spindle Spinning
title_full Recreating Historic European Spindle Spinning
title_fullStr Recreating Historic European Spindle Spinning
title_full_unstemmed Recreating Historic European Spindle Spinning
title_sort recreating historic european spindle spinning
publisher EXARC
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4443735e85b44a309cac00b7cf4b63e0
work_keys_str_mv AT maryannmegancleaton recreatinghistoriceuropeanspindlespinning
AT aliceroseevans recreatinghistoriceuropeanspindlespinning
AT janehunt recreatinghistoriceuropeanspindlespinning
AT cathelinadialessandri recreatinghistoriceuropeanspindlespinning
_version_ 1718404866293891072