Macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes with a special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon

Teresa M Jenisch,1 Florian Zeman,2 Michael Koller,2 David A Märker,1 Horst Helbig,1 Wolfgang A Herrmann1,3 1Department of Ophthalmology, 2Centre for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, 3Department of Ophthalmology, St John of God Hospital, Regensburg, Germany Purpose: The ai...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jenisch TM, Zeman F, Koller M, Märker DA, Helbig H, Herrmann WA
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/446393dd65e141729280c274a75db5fa
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:446393dd65e141729280c274a75db5fa
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:446393dd65e141729280c274a75db5fa2021-12-02T04:50:57ZMacular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes with a special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/446393dd65e141729280c274a75db5fa2017-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/macular-hole-surgery-an-analysis-of-risk-factors-for-the-anatomical-an-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Teresa M Jenisch,1 Florian Zeman,2 Michael Koller,2 David A Märker,1 Horst Helbig,1 Wolfgang A Herrmann1,3 1Department of Ophthalmology, 2Centre for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, 3Department of Ophthalmology, St John of God Hospital, Regensburg, Germany Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes of macular hole (MH) surgery with special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon. Methods: A total of 225 surgeries on idiopathic MHs (IMHs) performed by 6 surgeons with a mean follow-up period of 20.5 months were reviewed in this retrospective study. Outcome parameters focused on IMH closure, complications and visual acuity improvement. The results of MH surgeries performed by experienced surgeons were compared to those of surgeons in training. Results: The average MH size was 381 µm (standard deviation [SD]=168). Brilliant blue G (BBG) for internal limiting membrane (ILM) staining was used in 109 (48%) eyes and indocyanine green (ICG) in 116 (52%) eyes. As endotamponade, 20% SF6 was used in 38 (17%) cases, 16% C2F6 in 33 (15%) cases and 16% C3F8 in 154 (68%) cases. IMH closure was achieved in 194 eyes (86%). Mean preoperative visual acuity was 0.84 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR; SD=0.29, range: 0.3–1.5); surgery led to a mean improvement of 0.40 (SD=0.37) log MAR. Although the MH closure rate was the same using BBG or ICG for ILM peeling, visual acuity improvement was better in eyes peeled with BBG compared to eyes peeled with ICG (log MAR: BBG: 0.38 [95% CI: 0.32, 0.44] vs ICG: 0.48 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.54], P=0.029). Surgeons with previous experience in vitreoretinal surgery of ≥6 years achieved better visual outcomes compared to surgeons with 0–3 years of experience, regardless of the MH size, preoperative visual acuity, time to follow-up or dye used for ILM peeling (0–3 years [0.27, ∆log MAR] vs ≥6 years [0.43, ∆log MAR], P=0.009). Conclusion: Our results indicate that vitrectomy with ILM peeling performed by non-experienced surgeons is a safe procedure leading to good anatomical and functional results. Very experienced surgeons may achieve even better functional outcomes. Keywords: idiopathic macular hole, vitrectomy, ILM peeling, intraocular tamponade, brilliant peelJenisch TMZeman FKoller MMärker DAHelbig HHerrmann WADove Medical Pressarticleidiopathic macular holevitrectomyILM peelingintraocular tamponadebrilliant peelOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 11, Pp 1127-1134 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic idiopathic macular hole
vitrectomy
ILM peeling
intraocular tamponade
brilliant peel
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle idiopathic macular hole
vitrectomy
ILM peeling
intraocular tamponade
brilliant peel
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Jenisch TM
Zeman F
Koller M
Märker DA
Helbig H
Herrmann WA
Macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes with a special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon
description Teresa M Jenisch,1 Florian Zeman,2 Michael Koller,2 David A Märker,1 Horst Helbig,1 Wolfgang A Herrmann1,3 1Department of Ophthalmology, 2Centre for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, 3Department of Ophthalmology, St John of God Hospital, Regensburg, Germany Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes of macular hole (MH) surgery with special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon. Methods: A total of 225 surgeries on idiopathic MHs (IMHs) performed by 6 surgeons with a mean follow-up period of 20.5 months were reviewed in this retrospective study. Outcome parameters focused on IMH closure, complications and visual acuity improvement. The results of MH surgeries performed by experienced surgeons were compared to those of surgeons in training. Results: The average MH size was 381 µm (standard deviation [SD]=168). Brilliant blue G (BBG) for internal limiting membrane (ILM) staining was used in 109 (48%) eyes and indocyanine green (ICG) in 116 (52%) eyes. As endotamponade, 20% SF6 was used in 38 (17%) cases, 16% C2F6 in 33 (15%) cases and 16% C3F8 in 154 (68%) cases. IMH closure was achieved in 194 eyes (86%). Mean preoperative visual acuity was 0.84 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR; SD=0.29, range: 0.3–1.5); surgery led to a mean improvement of 0.40 (SD=0.37) log MAR. Although the MH closure rate was the same using BBG or ICG for ILM peeling, visual acuity improvement was better in eyes peeled with BBG compared to eyes peeled with ICG (log MAR: BBG: 0.38 [95% CI: 0.32, 0.44] vs ICG: 0.48 [95% CI: 0.42, 0.54], P=0.029). Surgeons with previous experience in vitreoretinal surgery of ≥6 years achieved better visual outcomes compared to surgeons with 0–3 years of experience, regardless of the MH size, preoperative visual acuity, time to follow-up or dye used for ILM peeling (0–3 years [0.27, ∆log MAR] vs ≥6 years [0.43, ∆log MAR], P=0.009). Conclusion: Our results indicate that vitrectomy with ILM peeling performed by non-experienced surgeons is a safe procedure leading to good anatomical and functional results. Very experienced surgeons may achieve even better functional outcomes. Keywords: idiopathic macular hole, vitrectomy, ILM peeling, intraocular tamponade, brilliant peel
format article
author Jenisch TM
Zeman F
Koller M
Märker DA
Helbig H
Herrmann WA
author_facet Jenisch TM
Zeman F
Koller M
Märker DA
Helbig H
Herrmann WA
author_sort Jenisch TM
title Macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes with a special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon
title_short Macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes with a special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon
title_full Macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes with a special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon
title_fullStr Macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes with a special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon
title_full_unstemmed Macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes with a special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon
title_sort macular hole surgery: an analysis of risk factors for the anatomical and functional outcomes with a special emphasis on the experience of the surgeon
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/446393dd65e141729280c274a75db5fa
work_keys_str_mv AT jenischtm macularholesurgeryananalysisofriskfactorsfortheanatomicalandfunctionaloutcomeswithaspecialemphasisontheexperienceofthesurgeon
AT zemanf macularholesurgeryananalysisofriskfactorsfortheanatomicalandfunctionaloutcomeswithaspecialemphasisontheexperienceofthesurgeon
AT kollerm macularholesurgeryananalysisofriskfactorsfortheanatomicalandfunctionaloutcomeswithaspecialemphasisontheexperienceofthesurgeon
AT markerda macularholesurgeryananalysisofriskfactorsfortheanatomicalandfunctionaloutcomeswithaspecialemphasisontheexperienceofthesurgeon
AT helbigh macularholesurgeryananalysisofriskfactorsfortheanatomicalandfunctionaloutcomeswithaspecialemphasisontheexperienceofthesurgeon
AT herrmannwa macularholesurgeryananalysisofriskfactorsfortheanatomicalandfunctionaloutcomeswithaspecialemphasisontheexperienceofthesurgeon
_version_ 1718401001742925824