America and the Persian Gulf

Steve A. Yetiv, an assistant professor of political science at Old Dominion University in Virginia and a research affiliate at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University, has written a most interesting book on what he calls the "third-party dimension in world politics." B...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Michael D. Berdine
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: International Institute of Islamic Thought 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4463b4fda3ec4ae1857c3e99c1628860
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4463b4fda3ec4ae1857c3e99c1628860
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4463b4fda3ec4ae1857c3e99c16288602021-12-02T19:22:42ZAmerica and the Persian Gulf10.35632/ajis.v14i4.22272690-37332690-3741https://doaj.org/article/4463b4fda3ec4ae1857c3e99c16288601997-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/2227https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3733https://doaj.org/toc/2690-3741 Steve A. Yetiv, an assistant professor of political science at Old Dominion University in Virginia and a research affiliate at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University, has written a most interesting book on what he calls the "third-party dimension in world politics." Based on his doctoral dissertation, Yetiv’s thesis, which at first glance seems a simple and natural way to view the cause-and-effect relationships of historical events and conflicts, is far more complex. No “domino theory,” which focuses on the primary actors, the third-party dimension in world politics, as its name implies, focuses on the “third-party” actor, or actors, vis-8-vis events on the world stage. Primarily concerned with how conflict in the Persian Gulf area in the late 1970’s, 1980’s and early 1990’s affected the United States’ position in the Middle East, America and the Persian Gulf generally examines the third-party situation and, in particular, how its position changes-for better or worse-as a result of the actions of the main participants and other third parties who are active or passive participants in diplomatic crises, conflicts, and revolutions. Furthermore, in emphasizing its importance, Professor Yetiv writes that by examining “the conditions under which the third party is weakened or strengthened by conflict. . . we may learn more about the utility of statecraft, the politics of rapidly changing conflictual regions of the world, conflict processes and outcomes, and conflict avoidance and resolution.” He goes on to state that “the study of the third party will tell us something about the third party itself be it a state, an international organization, or some other actor in world politics.” Last but not least, it “can also inform us about the context in which the third party plays a role, the long-term role of the third party in that context, other contexts which the third party affects, and the nature and impact of conflict in general” (p. 158). Michael D. BerdineInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtarticleIslamBP1-253ENAmerican Journal of Islam and Society, Vol 14, Iss 4 (1997)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Islam
BP1-253
spellingShingle Islam
BP1-253
Michael D. Berdine
America and the Persian Gulf
description Steve A. Yetiv, an assistant professor of political science at Old Dominion University in Virginia and a research affiliate at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Harvard University, has written a most interesting book on what he calls the "third-party dimension in world politics." Based on his doctoral dissertation, Yetiv’s thesis, which at first glance seems a simple and natural way to view the cause-and-effect relationships of historical events and conflicts, is far more complex. No “domino theory,” which focuses on the primary actors, the third-party dimension in world politics, as its name implies, focuses on the “third-party” actor, or actors, vis-8-vis events on the world stage. Primarily concerned with how conflict in the Persian Gulf area in the late 1970’s, 1980’s and early 1990’s affected the United States’ position in the Middle East, America and the Persian Gulf generally examines the third-party situation and, in particular, how its position changes-for better or worse-as a result of the actions of the main participants and other third parties who are active or passive participants in diplomatic crises, conflicts, and revolutions. Furthermore, in emphasizing its importance, Professor Yetiv writes that by examining “the conditions under which the third party is weakened or strengthened by conflict. . . we may learn more about the utility of statecraft, the politics of rapidly changing conflictual regions of the world, conflict processes and outcomes, and conflict avoidance and resolution.” He goes on to state that “the study of the third party will tell us something about the third party itself be it a state, an international organization, or some other actor in world politics.” Last but not least, it “can also inform us about the context in which the third party plays a role, the long-term role of the third party in that context, other contexts which the third party affects, and the nature and impact of conflict in general” (p. 158).
format article
author Michael D. Berdine
author_facet Michael D. Berdine
author_sort Michael D. Berdine
title America and the Persian Gulf
title_short America and the Persian Gulf
title_full America and the Persian Gulf
title_fullStr America and the Persian Gulf
title_full_unstemmed America and the Persian Gulf
title_sort america and the persian gulf
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
publishDate 1997
url https://doaj.org/article/4463b4fda3ec4ae1857c3e99c1628860
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeldberdine americaandthepersiangulf
_version_ 1718376672578764800