Role of Creatine Kinase in the Troponin Era: A Systematic Review

Introduction: The diagnosis of non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) depends on a combination of history, electrocardiogram, and cardiac biomarkers. The most sensitive and specific biomarkers for cardiac injury are the troponin assays. Many hospitals continue to automatically order less sen...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel Beamish, Tetyana Maniuk, Muhammad Mukarram, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/44799d6d9e7b45648a1865a005954c6c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:44799d6d9e7b45648a1865a005954c6c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:44799d6d9e7b45648a1865a005954c6c2021-11-17T15:19:27ZRole of Creatine Kinase in the Troponin Era: A Systematic Review1936-901810.5811/westjem.2020.11.47709https://doaj.org/article/44799d6d9e7b45648a1865a005954c6c2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/1950b7rshttps://doaj.org/toc/1936-9018Introduction: The diagnosis of non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) depends on a combination of history, electrocardiogram, and cardiac biomarkers. The most sensitive and specific biomarkers for cardiac injury are the troponin assays. Many hospitals continue to automatically order less sensitive and less specific biomarkers such as creatine kinase (CK) alongside cardiac troponin (cTn) for workup of patients with chest pain. The objective of this systematic review was to identify whether CK testing is useful in the workup of patients with NSTEMI symptoms. Methods: We undertook a systematic review to ascertain whether CK ordered as part of the workup for NSTEMI was useful in screening patients with cardiac chest pain. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 1995–September 2020. Additional papers were added after consultation with experts. We screened a total of 2,865 papers, of which eight were included in the final analysis. These papers all compared CK and cTn for NSTEMI diagnosis. Results: In each of the eight papers included in the analysis, cTn showed a greater sensitivity and specificity than CK in the diagnosis of NSTEMI. Furthermore, none of the articles published reliable evidence that CK is useful in NSTEMI diagnosis when troponin was negative. Conclusion: There is no evidence to continue to use CK as part of the workup of NSTEMI acute coronary syndrome in undifferentiated chest pain patients. We conclude that CK should not be used to screen patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.Daniel BeamishTetyana ManiukMuhammad MukarramVenkatesh ThiruganasambandamoorthyeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaarticleMedicineRMedical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aidRC86-88.9ENWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol 22, Iss 6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Medical emergencies. Critical care. Intensive care. First aid
RC86-88.9
Daniel Beamish
Tetyana Maniuk
Muhammad Mukarram
Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
Role of Creatine Kinase in the Troponin Era: A Systematic Review
description Introduction: The diagnosis of non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) depends on a combination of history, electrocardiogram, and cardiac biomarkers. The most sensitive and specific biomarkers for cardiac injury are the troponin assays. Many hospitals continue to automatically order less sensitive and less specific biomarkers such as creatine kinase (CK) alongside cardiac troponin (cTn) for workup of patients with chest pain. The objective of this systematic review was to identify whether CK testing is useful in the workup of patients with NSTEMI symptoms. Methods: We undertook a systematic review to ascertain whether CK ordered as part of the workup for NSTEMI was useful in screening patients with cardiac chest pain. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from January 1995–September 2020. Additional papers were added after consultation with experts. We screened a total of 2,865 papers, of which eight were included in the final analysis. These papers all compared CK and cTn for NSTEMI diagnosis. Results: In each of the eight papers included in the analysis, cTn showed a greater sensitivity and specificity than CK in the diagnosis of NSTEMI. Furthermore, none of the articles published reliable evidence that CK is useful in NSTEMI diagnosis when troponin was negative. Conclusion: There is no evidence to continue to use CK as part of the workup of NSTEMI acute coronary syndrome in undifferentiated chest pain patients. We conclude that CK should not be used to screen patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.
format article
author Daniel Beamish
Tetyana Maniuk
Muhammad Mukarram
Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
author_facet Daniel Beamish
Tetyana Maniuk
Muhammad Mukarram
Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy
author_sort Daniel Beamish
title Role of Creatine Kinase in the Troponin Era: A Systematic Review
title_short Role of Creatine Kinase in the Troponin Era: A Systematic Review
title_full Role of Creatine Kinase in the Troponin Era: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Role of Creatine Kinase in the Troponin Era: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Role of Creatine Kinase in the Troponin Era: A Systematic Review
title_sort role of creatine kinase in the troponin era: a systematic review
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/44799d6d9e7b45648a1865a005954c6c
work_keys_str_mv AT danielbeamish roleofcreatinekinaseinthetroponineraasystematicreview
AT tetyanamaniuk roleofcreatinekinaseinthetroponineraasystematicreview
AT muhammadmukarram roleofcreatinekinaseinthetroponineraasystematicreview
AT venkateshthiruganasambandamoorthy roleofcreatinekinaseinthetroponineraasystematicreview
_version_ 1718425411049750528