China – EU’s “Significant Other”?

Following the idea of the “other” in the work of Ernesto Laclau and the perspective of post-foundational discourse analysis, the study focusses on Chinese strategical internal and external pre- and post-Covid-19 political specifics and policies and how they interact (or contradict) with the “Europe...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Martin Milanov
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN PL
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2021
Materias:	European Union China strategy identity governance Law K Political science J
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/447baa7c9efc4e03b6717514297b0b70
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:447baa7c9efc4e03b6717514297b0b70
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:447baa7c9efc4e03b6717514297b0b702021-11-30T12:53:18ZChina – EU’s “Significant Other”? 10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.73.031733-67162391-6737https://doaj.org/article/447baa7c9efc4e03b6717514297b0b702021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/politeja/article/view/3956https://doaj.org/toc/1733-6716https://doaj.org/toc/2391-6737 Following the idea of the “other” in the work of Ernesto Laclau and the perspective of post-foundational discourse analysis, the study focusses on Chinese strategical internal and external pre- and post-Covid-19 political specifics and policies and how they interact (or contradict) with the “European” vision of the world and most importantly itself. As Laclau says, “the notion of “constitutive outside” emphasizes the always present possibility that differential relationship between an entity and its “constitutive outside” turns into antagonism.” For more than three decades, the EC/EU has been steadily building up its foreign relations architecture and has proven its desire to project its ideals and values worldwide. However, during the same period, after “the century of humiliation,” China has also reached a point in its history where it wants to see the world according to its national interests and views. This work attempts to analyze some key features inherent to both the EU and China, such as strategies, relation with other countries, typical governmental architecture, and some aspects of identity, which could help in better understanding the possible contradictions and areas of cooperation in their way of conceptualizing themselves as key players on the world stage. This will reflect the need for greater European civic awareness in the upcoming decades, as suggested by the author. Martin MilanovKsiegarnia Akademicka PublishingarticleEuropean UnionChinastrategyidentitygovernanceLawKPolitical scienceJENPLPoliteja, Vol 18, Iss 4(73) (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN PL
topic	European Union China strategy identity governance Law K Political science J
spellingShingle	European Union China strategy identity governance Law K Political science J Martin Milanov China – EU’s “Significant Other”?
description	Following the idea of the “other” in the work of Ernesto Laclau and the perspective of post-foundational discourse analysis, the study focusses on Chinese strategical internal and external pre- and post-Covid-19 political specifics and policies and how they interact (or contradict) with the “European” vision of the world and most importantly itself. As Laclau says, “the notion of “constitutive outside” emphasizes the always present possibility that differential relationship between an entity and its “constitutive outside” turns into antagonism.” For more than three decades, the EC/EU has been steadily building up its foreign relations architecture and has proven its desire to project its ideals and values worldwide. However, during the same period, after “the century of humiliation,” China has also reached a point in its history where it wants to see the world according to its national interests and views. This work attempts to analyze some key features inherent to both the EU and China, such as strategies, relation with other countries, typical governmental architecture, and some aspects of identity, which could help in better understanding the possible contradictions and areas of cooperation in their way of conceptualizing themselves as key players on the world stage. This will reflect the need for greater European civic awareness in the upcoming decades, as suggested by the author.
format	article
author	Martin Milanov
author_facet	Martin Milanov
author_sort	Martin Milanov
title	China – EU’s “Significant Other”?
title_short	China – EU’s “Significant Other”?
title_full	China – EU’s “Significant Other”?
title_fullStr	China – EU’s “Significant Other”?
title_full_unstemmed	China – EU’s “Significant Other”?
title_sort	china – eu’s “significant other”?
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/447baa7c9efc4e03b6717514297b0b70
work_keys_str_mv	AT martinmilanov chinaeussignificantother
_version_	1718406557630201856

China – EU’s “Significant Other”?

Ejemplares similares