Environmental DNA‐derived pathogen gene sequences can expand surveillance when pathogen titers are decoupled in eDNA and hosts

Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) collection has emerged as a powerful and noninvasive wildlife population and pathogen‐monitoring tool. Ranavirus is an emerging pathogen linked to die‐offs in amphibian species. Applications of eDNA detection for ranavirus surveillance have shown promise, but it is...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alyssa W. Kaganer, Leah D. Nagel, Tess E. Youker‐Smith, Elizabeth M. Bunting, Matthew P. Hare
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/447cdf1e7c164886a7bc94e23427ce91
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:447cdf1e7c164886a7bc94e23427ce91
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:447cdf1e7c164886a7bc94e23427ce912021-11-23T16:15:25ZEnvironmental DNA‐derived pathogen gene sequences can expand surveillance when pathogen titers are decoupled in eDNA and hosts2637-494310.1002/edn3.240https://doaj.org/article/447cdf1e7c164886a7bc94e23427ce912021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.240https://doaj.org/toc/2637-4943Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) collection has emerged as a powerful and noninvasive wildlife population and pathogen‐monitoring tool. Ranavirus is an emerging pathogen linked to die‐offs in amphibian species. Applications of eDNA detection for ranavirus surveillance have shown promise, but it is unclear how reliably eDNA represents viral pressure on host populations. We evaluated the relationship of ranavirus titers in hosts and eDNA in four New York vernal pools from May to October 2016. We compared ranavirus titers in aquatic eDNA samples (n = 562) and liver samples (n = 362) of wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) and green frog (Lithobates clamitans) larvae from pools with past ranavirus die‐offs. We detected low‐quantity Ranavirus DNA (<Log10 0.7 copies) in larval liver samples from two pools but observed no signs of clinical disease or die‐offs in any frog population. Despite low ranavirus quantities in hosts, we observed sustained moderate titers of Ranavirus eDNA in all pools with peak titers (<Log10 3 copies/ml) occurring after observed host infections. We identified the viral strain in the pool network, compared viral populations between host and environment, and identified longitudinal genetic changes in the virus by assembling five complete viral gene sequences from host and eDNA samples collected in 2016 and archived host samples from a past outbreak. The Ranavirus at this site was closely related to both Frog Virus 3 (FV3) reference isolate and FV3—Spotted Salamander—Maine isolate. We identified polymorphisms in 2016 host‐derived Ranavirus sequences that were rare in 2016 eDNA‐derived gene sequences and absent from archived host sequences, suggesting that ranavirus in resident hosts has changed over time within our field site and is not the primary source of Ranavirus DNA detected in environmental samples. We therefore suggest that vernal pools may function as catchment basins of eDNA from surrounding uplands.Alyssa W. KaganerLeah D. NagelTess E. Youker‐SmithElizabeth M. BuntingMatthew P. HareWileyarticleamphibiansbiological monitoringcommunicable diseasesemergingnonlethal samplingpondsEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350Microbial ecologyQR100-130ENEnvironmental DNA, Vol 3, Iss 6, Pp 1192-1207 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic amphibians
biological monitoring
communicable diseases
emerging
nonlethal sampling
ponds
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Microbial ecology
QR100-130
spellingShingle amphibians
biological monitoring
communicable diseases
emerging
nonlethal sampling
ponds
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Microbial ecology
QR100-130
Alyssa W. Kaganer
Leah D. Nagel
Tess E. Youker‐Smith
Elizabeth M. Bunting
Matthew P. Hare
Environmental DNA‐derived pathogen gene sequences can expand surveillance when pathogen titers are decoupled in eDNA and hosts
description Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) collection has emerged as a powerful and noninvasive wildlife population and pathogen‐monitoring tool. Ranavirus is an emerging pathogen linked to die‐offs in amphibian species. Applications of eDNA detection for ranavirus surveillance have shown promise, but it is unclear how reliably eDNA represents viral pressure on host populations. We evaluated the relationship of ranavirus titers in hosts and eDNA in four New York vernal pools from May to October 2016. We compared ranavirus titers in aquatic eDNA samples (n = 562) and liver samples (n = 362) of wood frog (Lithobates sylvaticus) and green frog (Lithobates clamitans) larvae from pools with past ranavirus die‐offs. We detected low‐quantity Ranavirus DNA (<Log10 0.7 copies) in larval liver samples from two pools but observed no signs of clinical disease or die‐offs in any frog population. Despite low ranavirus quantities in hosts, we observed sustained moderate titers of Ranavirus eDNA in all pools with peak titers (<Log10 3 copies/ml) occurring after observed host infections. We identified the viral strain in the pool network, compared viral populations between host and environment, and identified longitudinal genetic changes in the virus by assembling five complete viral gene sequences from host and eDNA samples collected in 2016 and archived host samples from a past outbreak. The Ranavirus at this site was closely related to both Frog Virus 3 (FV3) reference isolate and FV3—Spotted Salamander—Maine isolate. We identified polymorphisms in 2016 host‐derived Ranavirus sequences that were rare in 2016 eDNA‐derived gene sequences and absent from archived host sequences, suggesting that ranavirus in resident hosts has changed over time within our field site and is not the primary source of Ranavirus DNA detected in environmental samples. We therefore suggest that vernal pools may function as catchment basins of eDNA from surrounding uplands.
format article
author Alyssa W. Kaganer
Leah D. Nagel
Tess E. Youker‐Smith
Elizabeth M. Bunting
Matthew P. Hare
author_facet Alyssa W. Kaganer
Leah D. Nagel
Tess E. Youker‐Smith
Elizabeth M. Bunting
Matthew P. Hare
author_sort Alyssa W. Kaganer
title Environmental DNA‐derived pathogen gene sequences can expand surveillance when pathogen titers are decoupled in eDNA and hosts
title_short Environmental DNA‐derived pathogen gene sequences can expand surveillance when pathogen titers are decoupled in eDNA and hosts
title_full Environmental DNA‐derived pathogen gene sequences can expand surveillance when pathogen titers are decoupled in eDNA and hosts
title_fullStr Environmental DNA‐derived pathogen gene sequences can expand surveillance when pathogen titers are decoupled in eDNA and hosts
title_full_unstemmed Environmental DNA‐derived pathogen gene sequences can expand surveillance when pathogen titers are decoupled in eDNA and hosts
title_sort environmental dna‐derived pathogen gene sequences can expand surveillance when pathogen titers are decoupled in edna and hosts
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/447cdf1e7c164886a7bc94e23427ce91
work_keys_str_mv AT alyssawkaganer environmentaldnaderivedpathogengenesequencescanexpandsurveillancewhenpathogentitersaredecoupledinednaandhosts
AT leahdnagel environmentaldnaderivedpathogengenesequencescanexpandsurveillancewhenpathogentitersaredecoupledinednaandhosts
AT tesseyoukersmith environmentaldnaderivedpathogengenesequencescanexpandsurveillancewhenpathogentitersaredecoupledinednaandhosts
AT elizabethmbunting environmentaldnaderivedpathogengenesequencescanexpandsurveillancewhenpathogentitersaredecoupledinednaandhosts
AT matthewphare environmentaldnaderivedpathogengenesequencescanexpandsurveillancewhenpathogentitersaredecoupledinednaandhosts
_version_ 1718416204514721792