Modified plant architecture integrated with liquid fertilizers improves fruit productivity and quality of tomato in North West Himalaya, India

Abstract India produces around 19.0 million tonnes of tomatoes annually, which is insufficient to meet the ever-increasing demand. A big gap of tomato productivity (72.14 t ha–1) between India (24.66 t ha–1) and the USA (96.8 t ha–1) exist, which can be bridged by integrating trellis system of shoot...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avinash Chandra Rathore, Harsh Mehta, J. Jayaprakash, Charan Singh, Anand Kumar Gupta, Pawan Kumar, Sadikul Islam, Saswat Kumar Kar, Sridhar Patra, Lekh Chand, Vijay Kumar Doharey, Prabhat Ranjan Ojasvi, Ram Swaroop Yadav, M. Madhu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/448a570e22a34f538671f0931e32f618
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:448a570e22a34f538671f0931e32f618
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:448a570e22a34f538671f0931e32f6182021-12-02T17:26:49ZModified plant architecture integrated with liquid fertilizers improves fruit productivity and quality of tomato in North West Himalaya, India10.1038/s41598-021-98209-z2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/448a570e22a34f538671f0931e32f6182021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98209-zhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract India produces around 19.0 million tonnes of tomatoes annually, which is insufficient to meet the ever-increasing demand. A big gap of tomato productivity (72.14 t ha–1) between India (24.66 t ha–1) and the USA (96.8 t ha–1) exist, which can be bridged by integrating trellis system of shoot training, shoot pruning, liquid fertilizers, farmyard manure, and mulching technologies. Therefore, the present experiment was conducted on tomato (cv. Himsona) during 2019–2020 at farmers' fields to improve tomato productivity and quality. There were five treatments laid in a randomized block design (RBD) with three replications; T1 [Farmer practice on the flatbed with RDF @ N120:P60:K60 + FYM @6.0 t ha−1 without mulch], T2 [T1 + Polythene mulch (50 microns)], T3 [Tomato plants grown on the raised bed with polythene mulch + FYM @ 8.0 t ha−1 + Single shoot trellis system + Side shoot pruning + Liquid Fertilizer (LF1—N19:P19:K19) @ 2.0 g l–1 for vegetative growth + Liquid Fertilizer (LF2—N0: P52: K34) @ 1.5 g l–1 for improving fruit quality], T4 [Tomato plants grown on the raised bed with polythene mulch + FYM @ 8.0 t ha−1 + Single shoot trellis system + Side shoot pruning + LF1 @ 4.0 g l–1 + LF2 @ 3.0 g l–1], and T5 [Tomato plants grown on the raised bed with polythene mulch + FYM @ 10.0 t ha−1 + Single shoot trellis system + Side shoot pruning + LF1 @ 6.0 g l–1 + LF2 @ 4.5 g l–1]. The results revealed that tomato plant grown on the raised beds with polythene mulch, shoot pruning, trellising, liquid fertilizers, and farmyard manure (i.e., T5) recorded higher shoot length, dry matter content, and tomato productivity by 20.75–141.21, 18.79–169.4, and 18.89–160.87% as compared to T4–T1 treatments, respectively. The T5 treatment also recorded the highest water productivity (28.39 kg m–3), improved fruit qualities, net return (10,751 USD ha–1), benefit–cost ratio (3.08), microbial population, and enzymatic activities as compared to other treatments. The ranking and hierarchical clustering of treatments confirmed the superiority of the T5 treatment over all other treatments.Avinash Chandra RathoreHarsh MehtaJ. JayaprakashCharan SinghAnand Kumar GuptaPawan KumarSadikul IslamSaswat Kumar KarSridhar PatraLekh ChandVijay Kumar DohareyPrabhat Ranjan OjasviRam Swaroop YadavM. MadhuNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Avinash Chandra Rathore
Harsh Mehta
J. Jayaprakash
Charan Singh
Anand Kumar Gupta
Pawan Kumar
Sadikul Islam
Saswat Kumar Kar
Sridhar Patra
Lekh Chand
Vijay Kumar Doharey
Prabhat Ranjan Ojasvi
Ram Swaroop Yadav
M. Madhu
Modified plant architecture integrated with liquid fertilizers improves fruit productivity and quality of tomato in North West Himalaya, India
description Abstract India produces around 19.0 million tonnes of tomatoes annually, which is insufficient to meet the ever-increasing demand. A big gap of tomato productivity (72.14 t ha–1) between India (24.66 t ha–1) and the USA (96.8 t ha–1) exist, which can be bridged by integrating trellis system of shoot training, shoot pruning, liquid fertilizers, farmyard manure, and mulching technologies. Therefore, the present experiment was conducted on tomato (cv. Himsona) during 2019–2020 at farmers' fields to improve tomato productivity and quality. There were five treatments laid in a randomized block design (RBD) with three replications; T1 [Farmer practice on the flatbed with RDF @ N120:P60:K60 + FYM @6.0 t ha−1 without mulch], T2 [T1 + Polythene mulch (50 microns)], T3 [Tomato plants grown on the raised bed with polythene mulch + FYM @ 8.0 t ha−1 + Single shoot trellis system + Side shoot pruning + Liquid Fertilizer (LF1—N19:P19:K19) @ 2.0 g l–1 for vegetative growth + Liquid Fertilizer (LF2—N0: P52: K34) @ 1.5 g l–1 for improving fruit quality], T4 [Tomato plants grown on the raised bed with polythene mulch + FYM @ 8.0 t ha−1 + Single shoot trellis system + Side shoot pruning + LF1 @ 4.0 g l–1 + LF2 @ 3.0 g l–1], and T5 [Tomato plants grown on the raised bed with polythene mulch + FYM @ 10.0 t ha−1 + Single shoot trellis system + Side shoot pruning + LF1 @ 6.0 g l–1 + LF2 @ 4.5 g l–1]. The results revealed that tomato plant grown on the raised beds with polythene mulch, shoot pruning, trellising, liquid fertilizers, and farmyard manure (i.e., T5) recorded higher shoot length, dry matter content, and tomato productivity by 20.75–141.21, 18.79–169.4, and 18.89–160.87% as compared to T4–T1 treatments, respectively. The T5 treatment also recorded the highest water productivity (28.39 kg m–3), improved fruit qualities, net return (10,751 USD ha–1), benefit–cost ratio (3.08), microbial population, and enzymatic activities as compared to other treatments. The ranking and hierarchical clustering of treatments confirmed the superiority of the T5 treatment over all other treatments.
format article
author Avinash Chandra Rathore
Harsh Mehta
J. Jayaprakash
Charan Singh
Anand Kumar Gupta
Pawan Kumar
Sadikul Islam
Saswat Kumar Kar
Sridhar Patra
Lekh Chand
Vijay Kumar Doharey
Prabhat Ranjan Ojasvi
Ram Swaroop Yadav
M. Madhu
author_facet Avinash Chandra Rathore
Harsh Mehta
J. Jayaprakash
Charan Singh
Anand Kumar Gupta
Pawan Kumar
Sadikul Islam
Saswat Kumar Kar
Sridhar Patra
Lekh Chand
Vijay Kumar Doharey
Prabhat Ranjan Ojasvi
Ram Swaroop Yadav
M. Madhu
author_sort Avinash Chandra Rathore
title Modified plant architecture integrated with liquid fertilizers improves fruit productivity and quality of tomato in North West Himalaya, India
title_short Modified plant architecture integrated with liquid fertilizers improves fruit productivity and quality of tomato in North West Himalaya, India
title_full Modified plant architecture integrated with liquid fertilizers improves fruit productivity and quality of tomato in North West Himalaya, India
title_fullStr Modified plant architecture integrated with liquid fertilizers improves fruit productivity and quality of tomato in North West Himalaya, India
title_full_unstemmed Modified plant architecture integrated with liquid fertilizers improves fruit productivity and quality of tomato in North West Himalaya, India
title_sort modified plant architecture integrated with liquid fertilizers improves fruit productivity and quality of tomato in north west himalaya, india
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/448a570e22a34f538671f0931e32f618
work_keys_str_mv AT avinashchandrarathore modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT harshmehta modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT jjayaprakash modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT charansingh modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT anandkumargupta modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT pawankumar modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT sadikulislam modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT saswatkumarkar modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT sridharpatra modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT lekhchand modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT vijaykumardoharey modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT prabhatranjanojasvi modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT ramswaroopyadav modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
AT mmadhu modifiedplantarchitectureintegratedwithliquidfertilizersimprovesfruitproductivityandqualityoftomatoinnorthwesthimalayaindia
_version_ 1718380784333619200