Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection

Abstract Atom-probe tomography (APT) facilitates nano- and atomic-scale characterization and analysis of microstructural features. Specifically, APT is well suited to study the interfacial properties of granular or heterophase systems. Traditionally, the identification of the interface between, for...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandeep Madireddy, Ding-Wen Chung, Troy Loeffler, Subramanian K. R. S. Sankaranarayanan, David N. Seidman, Prasanna Balaprakash, Olle Heinonen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2019
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/44bbc6b308d1471da03b8e1a1ab3c668
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:44bbc6b308d1471da03b8e1a1ab3c668
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:44bbc6b308d1471da03b8e1a1ab3c6682021-12-02T13:56:50ZPhase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection10.1038/s41598-019-56649-82045-2322https://doaj.org/article/44bbc6b308d1471da03b8e1a1ab3c6682019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56649-8https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Atom-probe tomography (APT) facilitates nano- and atomic-scale characterization and analysis of microstructural features. Specifically, APT is well suited to study the interfacial properties of granular or heterophase systems. Traditionally, the identification of the interface between, for precipitate and matrix phases, in APT data has been obtained either by extracting iso-concentration surfaces based on a user-supplied concentration value or by manually perturbing the concentration value until the iso-concentration surface qualitatively matches the interface. These approaches are subjective, not scalable, and may lead to inconsistencies due to local composition inhomogeneities. We introduce a digital image segmentation approach based on deep neural networks that transfer learned knowledge from natural images to automatically segment the data obtained from APT into different phases. This approach not only provides an efficient way to segment the data and extract interfacial properties but does so without the need for expensive interface labeling for training the segmentation model. We consider here a system with a precipitate phase in a matrix and with three different interface modalities—layered, isolated, and interconnected—that are obtained for different relative geometries of the precipitate phase. We demonstrate the accuracy of our segmentation approach through qualitative visualization of the interfaces, as well as through quantitative comparisons with proximity histograms obtained by using more traditional approaches.Sandeep MadireddyDing-Wen ChungTroy LoefflerSubramanian K. R. S. SankaranarayananDavid N. SeidmanPrasanna BalaprakashOlle HeinonenNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Sandeep Madireddy
Ding-Wen Chung
Troy Loeffler
Subramanian K. R. S. Sankaranarayanan
David N. Seidman
Prasanna Balaprakash
Olle Heinonen
Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection
description Abstract Atom-probe tomography (APT) facilitates nano- and atomic-scale characterization and analysis of microstructural features. Specifically, APT is well suited to study the interfacial properties of granular or heterophase systems. Traditionally, the identification of the interface between, for precipitate and matrix phases, in APT data has been obtained either by extracting iso-concentration surfaces based on a user-supplied concentration value or by manually perturbing the concentration value until the iso-concentration surface qualitatively matches the interface. These approaches are subjective, not scalable, and may lead to inconsistencies due to local composition inhomogeneities. We introduce a digital image segmentation approach based on deep neural networks that transfer learned knowledge from natural images to automatically segment the data obtained from APT into different phases. This approach not only provides an efficient way to segment the data and extract interfacial properties but does so without the need for expensive interface labeling for training the segmentation model. We consider here a system with a precipitate phase in a matrix and with three different interface modalities—layered, isolated, and interconnected—that are obtained for different relative geometries of the precipitate phase. We demonstrate the accuracy of our segmentation approach through qualitative visualization of the interfaces, as well as through quantitative comparisons with proximity histograms obtained by using more traditional approaches.
format article
author Sandeep Madireddy
Ding-Wen Chung
Troy Loeffler
Subramanian K. R. S. Sankaranarayanan
David N. Seidman
Prasanna Balaprakash
Olle Heinonen
author_facet Sandeep Madireddy
Ding-Wen Chung
Troy Loeffler
Subramanian K. R. S. Sankaranarayanan
David N. Seidman
Prasanna Balaprakash
Olle Heinonen
author_sort Sandeep Madireddy
title Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection
title_short Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection
title_full Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection
title_fullStr Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection
title_full_unstemmed Phase Segmentation in Atom-Probe Tomography Using Deep Learning-Based Edge Detection
title_sort phase segmentation in atom-probe tomography using deep learning-based edge detection
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/44bbc6b308d1471da03b8e1a1ab3c668
work_keys_str_mv AT sandeepmadireddy phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection
AT dingwenchung phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection
AT troyloeffler phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection
AT subramaniankrssankaranarayanan phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection
AT davidnseidman phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection
AT prasannabalaprakash phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection
AT olleheinonen phasesegmentationinatomprobetomographyusingdeeplearningbasededgedetection
_version_ 1718392317884235776