Terminy „sufiks” i „końcówka” w polskiej terminologii gramatycznej
The Terms “Suffix” and “Desinence” among Polish Grammatical Terms The Polish grammatical tradition seems unique in that the strict limiting of the use of the term “desinence, ending” to inflection and that of “suffix” to word formation is observed. This author argues against an obligatory status of...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | DE EN FR PL RU |
| Publicado: |
Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/44cee4bcb59141d7b6a4688f103d1438 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | The Terms “Suffix” and “Desinence” among Polish Grammatical Terms
The Polish grammatical tradition seems unique in that the strict limiting of the use of the term “desinence, ending” to inflection and that of “suffix” to word formation is observed. This author argues
against an obligatory status of that differentiation. His opinion is that both terms should interchangeably
be used because a special term for an inflectional suffix (= “ending”) generally only produces redundant syntagms as is, for instance, the case with “genitive ending” = “inflectional genitive suffix”. A special problem concerns the English suffix -ing that forms both inflectional forms (a beating boy) and gerunds (beating a boy) and cannot actually be classified as either “suffix” or “desinence” (the fact that the term “gerund” is used for both functions in modern grammars does not eliminate the distinctness of the functions).
|
|---|