Risk stratification for early-onset fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal serum biomarkers: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Abnormal maternal serum biomarkers (AMSB), identified through the aneuploidy screening programme, are frequent incidental findings in pregnancy. They are associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR), but previous studies have not examined whether this association is with early-onset (<...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: L. Ormesher, L. Warrander, Y. Liu, S. Thomas, L. Simcox, G. C. S. Smith, J. E. Myers, E. D. Johnstone
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/44e3d63be3224d5aa0a7a0b6bdae4348
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:44e3d63be3224d5aa0a7a0b6bdae4348
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:44e3d63be3224d5aa0a7a0b6bdae43482021-12-02T12:42:17ZRisk stratification for early-onset fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal serum biomarkers: a retrospective cohort study10.1038/s41598-020-78631-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/44e3d63be3224d5aa0a7a0b6bdae43482020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78631-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Abnormal maternal serum biomarkers (AMSB), identified through the aneuploidy screening programme, are frequent incidental findings in pregnancy. They are associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR), but previous studies have not examined whether this association is with early-onset (< 34 weeks) or late-onset (> 34 weeks) FGR; as a result there is no consensus on management. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence and phenotype of FGR in women with AMSB and test the predictive value of placental sonographic screening to predict early-onset FGR. 1196 pregnant women with AMSB underwent a 21–24 week “placental screen” comprising fetal and placental size, and uterine artery Doppler. Multivariable regression was used to calculate a predictive model for early-onset FGR (birthweight centile < 3rd/< 10th with absent umbilical end-diastolic flow, < 34 weeks). FGR prevalence was high (10.3%), however early-onset FGR was uncommon (2.3%). Placental screening effectively identified early-onset (area under the curve (AUC) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.00), but not late-onset FGR (AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.64–0.75). Internal validation demonstrated robust performance for detection/exclusion of early-onset FGR. In this cohort, utilisation of our proposed algorithm with targeted fetal growth and Doppler surveillance, compared with universal comprehensive surveillance would have avoided 1044 scans, potentiating significant cost-saving for maternity services.L. OrmesherL. WarranderY. LiuS. ThomasL. SimcoxG. C. S. SmithJ. E. MyersE. D. JohnstoneNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
L. Ormesher
L. Warrander
Y. Liu
S. Thomas
L. Simcox
G. C. S. Smith
J. E. Myers
E. D. Johnstone
Risk stratification for early-onset fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal serum biomarkers: a retrospective cohort study
description Abstract Abnormal maternal serum biomarkers (AMSB), identified through the aneuploidy screening programme, are frequent incidental findings in pregnancy. They are associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR), but previous studies have not examined whether this association is with early-onset (< 34 weeks) or late-onset (> 34 weeks) FGR; as a result there is no consensus on management. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence and phenotype of FGR in women with AMSB and test the predictive value of placental sonographic screening to predict early-onset FGR. 1196 pregnant women with AMSB underwent a 21–24 week “placental screen” comprising fetal and placental size, and uterine artery Doppler. Multivariable regression was used to calculate a predictive model for early-onset FGR (birthweight centile < 3rd/< 10th with absent umbilical end-diastolic flow, < 34 weeks). FGR prevalence was high (10.3%), however early-onset FGR was uncommon (2.3%). Placental screening effectively identified early-onset (area under the curve (AUC) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87–1.00), but not late-onset FGR (AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.64–0.75). Internal validation demonstrated robust performance for detection/exclusion of early-onset FGR. In this cohort, utilisation of our proposed algorithm with targeted fetal growth and Doppler surveillance, compared with universal comprehensive surveillance would have avoided 1044 scans, potentiating significant cost-saving for maternity services.
format article
author L. Ormesher
L. Warrander
Y. Liu
S. Thomas
L. Simcox
G. C. S. Smith
J. E. Myers
E. D. Johnstone
author_facet L. Ormesher
L. Warrander
Y. Liu
S. Thomas
L. Simcox
G. C. S. Smith
J. E. Myers
E. D. Johnstone
author_sort L. Ormesher
title Risk stratification for early-onset fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal serum biomarkers: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Risk stratification for early-onset fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal serum biomarkers: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Risk stratification for early-onset fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal serum biomarkers: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Risk stratification for early-onset fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal serum biomarkers: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Risk stratification for early-onset fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal serum biomarkers: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort risk stratification for early-onset fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal serum biomarkers: a retrospective cohort study
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/44e3d63be3224d5aa0a7a0b6bdae4348
work_keys_str_mv AT lormesher riskstratificationforearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictioninwomenwithabnormalserumbiomarkersaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lwarrander riskstratificationforearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictioninwomenwithabnormalserumbiomarkersaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yliu riskstratificationforearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictioninwomenwithabnormalserumbiomarkersaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sthomas riskstratificationforearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictioninwomenwithabnormalserumbiomarkersaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lsimcox riskstratificationforearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictioninwomenwithabnormalserumbiomarkersaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gcssmith riskstratificationforearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictioninwomenwithabnormalserumbiomarkersaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT jemyers riskstratificationforearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictioninwomenwithabnormalserumbiomarkersaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT edjohnstone riskstratificationforearlyonsetfetalgrowthrestrictioninwomenwithabnormalserumbiomarkersaretrospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1718393681654841344