Reliability in adolescent fMRI within two years – a comparison of three tasks

Abstract Longitudinal developmental fMRI studies just recently began to focus on within-subject reliability using the intraclass coefficient (ICC). It remains largely unclear which degree of reliability can be achieved in developmental studies and whether this depends on the type of task used. There...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Nora C. Vetter, Julius Steding, Sarah Jurk, Stephan Ripke, Eva Mennigen, Michael N. Smolka
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/44ea3090a71d41da9a4aaf7029999ada
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:44ea3090a71d41da9a4aaf7029999ada
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:44ea3090a71d41da9a4aaf7029999ada2021-12-02T16:07:45ZReliability in adolescent fMRI within two years – a comparison of three tasks10.1038/s41598-017-02334-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/44ea3090a71d41da9a4aaf7029999ada2017-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02334-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Longitudinal developmental fMRI studies just recently began to focus on within-subject reliability using the intraclass coefficient (ICC). It remains largely unclear which degree of reliability can be achieved in developmental studies and whether this depends on the type of task used. Therefore, we aimed to systematically investigate the reliability of three well-classified tasks: an emotional attention, a cognitive control, and an intertemporal choice paradigm. We hypothesized to find higher reliability in the cognitive task than in the emotional or reward-related task. 104 healthy mid-adolescents were scanned at age 14 and again at age 16 within M = 1.8 years using the same paradigms, scanner, and scanning protocols. Overall, we found both variability and stability (i.e. poor to excellent ICCs) depending largely on the region of interest (ROI) and task. Contrary to our hypothesis, whole brain reliability was fair for the cognitive control task but good for the emotional attention and intertemporal choice task. Subcortical ROIs (ventral striatum, amygdala) resulted in lower ICCs than visual ROIs. Current results add to the yet sparse overall ICC literature in both developing samples and adults. This study shows that analyses of stability, i.e. reliability, are helpful benchmarks for longitudinal studies and their implications for adolescent development.Nora C. VetterJulius StedingSarah JurkStephan RipkeEva MennigenMichael N. SmolkaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Nora C. Vetter Julius Steding Sarah Jurk Stephan Ripke Eva Mennigen Michael N. Smolka Reliability in adolescent fMRI within two years – a comparison of three tasks
description	Abstract Longitudinal developmental fMRI studies just recently began to focus on within-subject reliability using the intraclass coefficient (ICC). It remains largely unclear which degree of reliability can be achieved in developmental studies and whether this depends on the type of task used. Therefore, we aimed to systematically investigate the reliability of three well-classified tasks: an emotional attention, a cognitive control, and an intertemporal choice paradigm. We hypothesized to find higher reliability in the cognitive task than in the emotional or reward-related task. 104 healthy mid-adolescents were scanned at age 14 and again at age 16 within M = 1.8 years using the same paradigms, scanner, and scanning protocols. Overall, we found both variability and stability (i.e. poor to excellent ICCs) depending largely on the region of interest (ROI) and task. Contrary to our hypothesis, whole brain reliability was fair for the cognitive control task but good for the emotional attention and intertemporal choice task. Subcortical ROIs (ventral striatum, amygdala) resulted in lower ICCs than visual ROIs. Current results add to the yet sparse overall ICC literature in both developing samples and adults. This study shows that analyses of stability, i.e. reliability, are helpful benchmarks for longitudinal studies and their implications for adolescent development.
format	article
author	Nora C. Vetter Julius Steding Sarah Jurk Stephan Ripke Eva Mennigen Michael N. Smolka
author_facet	Nora C. Vetter Julius Steding Sarah Jurk Stephan Ripke Eva Mennigen Michael N. Smolka
author_sort	Nora C. Vetter
title	Reliability in adolescent fMRI within two years – a comparison of three tasks
title_short	Reliability in adolescent fMRI within two years – a comparison of three tasks
title_full	Reliability in adolescent fMRI within two years – a comparison of three tasks
title_fullStr	Reliability in adolescent fMRI within two years – a comparison of three tasks
title_full_unstemmed	Reliability in adolescent fMRI within two years – a comparison of three tasks
title_sort	reliability in adolescent fmri within two years – a comparison of three tasks
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/44ea3090a71d41da9a4aaf7029999ada
work_keys_str_mv	AT noracvetter reliabilityinadolescentfmriwithintwoyearsacomparisonofthreetasks AT juliussteding reliabilityinadolescentfmriwithintwoyearsacomparisonofthreetasks AT sarahjurk reliabilityinadolescentfmriwithintwoyearsacomparisonofthreetasks AT stephanripke reliabilityinadolescentfmriwithintwoyearsacomparisonofthreetasks AT evamennigen reliabilityinadolescentfmriwithintwoyearsacomparisonofthreetasks AT michaelnsmolka reliabilityinadolescentfmriwithintwoyearsacomparisonofthreetasks
_version_	1718384712726085632

Reliability in adolescent fMRI within two years – a comparison of three tasks

Ejemplares similares