Thomason (Un)conditionals

Thomason conditionals are sentences of the form if p, ~Kp. Given plausible assumptions, these sentences cause trouble for epistemic theories of indicative conditionals. Our aim is to show that Thomason examples are not indicative conditionals, but alternative unconditionals, in the sense put forwar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Andrés Soria Ruiz
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
IT
Publicado: Rosenberg & Sellier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/45039c545f4f4eaf8e34caace1c51de7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:45039c545f4f4eaf8e34caace1c51de7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:45039c545f4f4eaf8e34caace1c51de72021-12-02T10:15:20ZThomason (Un)conditionals10.13128/Phe_Mi-211092280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/45039c545f4f4eaf8e34caace1c51de72017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7269https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 Thomason conditionals are sentences of the form if p, ~Kp. Given plausible assumptions, these sentences cause trouble for epistemic theories of indicative conditionals. Our aim is to show that Thomason examples are not indicative conditionals, but alternative unconditionals, in the sense put forward by Rawlins (2013). This hypothesis solves the difficulty and explains certain features that set Thomason examples apart from run-of-the-mill indicative conditionals. Andrés Soria RuizRosenberg & Sellierarticleindicative conditionalsunconditionalsepistemic modalityAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 12 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
IT
topic indicative conditionals
unconditionals
epistemic modality
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
spellingShingle indicative conditionals
unconditionals
epistemic modality
Aesthetics
BH1-301
Ethics
BJ1-1725
Andrés Soria Ruiz
Thomason (Un)conditionals
description Thomason conditionals are sentences of the form if p, ~Kp. Given plausible assumptions, these sentences cause trouble for epistemic theories of indicative conditionals. Our aim is to show that Thomason examples are not indicative conditionals, but alternative unconditionals, in the sense put forward by Rawlins (2013). This hypothesis solves the difficulty and explains certain features that set Thomason examples apart from run-of-the-mill indicative conditionals.
format article
author Andrés Soria Ruiz
author_facet Andrés Soria Ruiz
author_sort Andrés Soria Ruiz
title Thomason (Un)conditionals
title_short Thomason (Un)conditionals
title_full Thomason (Un)conditionals
title_fullStr Thomason (Un)conditionals
title_full_unstemmed Thomason (Un)conditionals
title_sort thomason (un)conditionals
publisher Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/45039c545f4f4eaf8e34caace1c51de7
work_keys_str_mv AT andressoriaruiz thomasonunconditionals
_version_ 1718397458543804416