Machine learning-based prediction of acute kidney injury after nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma

Abstract The precise prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an important issue because of its relationship with subsequent kidney dysfunction and high mortality. Herein we addressed whether machine learning (ML) algorithms could predict postoperat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yeonhee Lee, Jiwon Ryu, Min Woo Kang, Kyung Ha Seo, Jayoun Kim, Jungyo Suh, Yong Chul Kim, Dong Ki Kim, Kook-Hwan Oh, Kwon Wook Joo, Yon Su Kim, Chang Wook Jeong, Sang Chul Lee, Cheol Kwak, Sejoong Kim, Seung Seok Han
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/453c98a5ce9c472bbe11c7f343605b8a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:453c98a5ce9c472bbe11c7f343605b8a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:453c98a5ce9c472bbe11c7f343605b8a2021-12-02T18:49:32ZMachine learning-based prediction of acute kidney injury after nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma10.1038/s41598-021-95019-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/453c98a5ce9c472bbe11c7f343605b8a2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95019-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The precise prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an important issue because of its relationship with subsequent kidney dysfunction and high mortality. Herein we addressed whether machine learning (ML) algorithms could predict postoperative AKI risk better than conventional logistic regression (LR) models. A total of 4104 RCC patients who had undergone unilateral nephrectomy from January 2003 to December 2017 were reviewed. ML models such as support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) were developed, and their performance based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, and F1 score was compared with that of the LR-based scoring model. Postoperative AKI developed in 1167 patients (28.4%). All the ML models had higher performance index values than the LR-based scoring model. Among them, the LightGBM model had the highest value of 0.810 (0.783–0.837). The decision curve analysis demonstrated a greater net benefit of the ML models than the LR-based scoring model over all the ranges of threshold probabilities. The application of ML algorithms improves the predictability of AKI after nephrectomy for RCC, and these models perform better than conventional LR-based models.Yeonhee LeeJiwon RyuMin Woo KangKyung Ha SeoJayoun KimJungyo SuhYong Chul KimDong Ki KimKook-Hwan OhKwon Wook JooYon Su KimChang Wook JeongSang Chul LeeCheol KwakSejoong KimSeung Seok HanNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Yeonhee Lee
Jiwon Ryu
Min Woo Kang
Kyung Ha Seo
Jayoun Kim
Jungyo Suh
Yong Chul Kim
Dong Ki Kim
Kook-Hwan Oh
Kwon Wook Joo
Yon Su Kim
Chang Wook Jeong
Sang Chul Lee
Cheol Kwak
Sejoong Kim
Seung Seok Han
Machine learning-based prediction of acute kidney injury after nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma
description Abstract The precise prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an important issue because of its relationship with subsequent kidney dysfunction and high mortality. Herein we addressed whether machine learning (ML) algorithms could predict postoperative AKI risk better than conventional logistic regression (LR) models. A total of 4104 RCC patients who had undergone unilateral nephrectomy from January 2003 to December 2017 were reviewed. ML models such as support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) were developed, and their performance based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, and F1 score was compared with that of the LR-based scoring model. Postoperative AKI developed in 1167 patients (28.4%). All the ML models had higher performance index values than the LR-based scoring model. Among them, the LightGBM model had the highest value of 0.810 (0.783–0.837). The decision curve analysis demonstrated a greater net benefit of the ML models than the LR-based scoring model over all the ranges of threshold probabilities. The application of ML algorithms improves the predictability of AKI after nephrectomy for RCC, and these models perform better than conventional LR-based models.
format article
author Yeonhee Lee
Jiwon Ryu
Min Woo Kang
Kyung Ha Seo
Jayoun Kim
Jungyo Suh
Yong Chul Kim
Dong Ki Kim
Kook-Hwan Oh
Kwon Wook Joo
Yon Su Kim
Chang Wook Jeong
Sang Chul Lee
Cheol Kwak
Sejoong Kim
Seung Seok Han
author_facet Yeonhee Lee
Jiwon Ryu
Min Woo Kang
Kyung Ha Seo
Jayoun Kim
Jungyo Suh
Yong Chul Kim
Dong Ki Kim
Kook-Hwan Oh
Kwon Wook Joo
Yon Su Kim
Chang Wook Jeong
Sang Chul Lee
Cheol Kwak
Sejoong Kim
Seung Seok Han
author_sort Yeonhee Lee
title Machine learning-based prediction of acute kidney injury after nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma
title_short Machine learning-based prediction of acute kidney injury after nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma
title_full Machine learning-based prediction of acute kidney injury after nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Machine learning-based prediction of acute kidney injury after nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning-based prediction of acute kidney injury after nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma
title_sort machine learning-based prediction of acute kidney injury after nephrectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/453c98a5ce9c472bbe11c7f343605b8a
work_keys_str_mv AT yeonheelee machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT jiwonryu machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT minwookang machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT kyunghaseo machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT jayounkim machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT jungyosuh machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT yongchulkim machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT dongkikim machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT kookhwanoh machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT kwonwookjoo machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT yonsukim machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT changwookjeong machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT sangchullee machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT cheolkwak machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT sejoongkim machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
AT seungseokhan machinelearningbasedpredictionofacutekidneyinjuryafternephrectomyinpatientswithrenalcellcarcinoma
_version_ 1718377557424865280