The Crisis of Ornament: Evaluation and Intercultural Divergences in the Visual Arts of the 19th and Early 20th Centuries

From the beginning of the 19th century up to the present, ornament has faced different crises because it is not an autonomous art but traditionally attached to a surface, be it architecture or applied arts. The fate of ornament has varied, according to leading theorists and critics in these fields....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Barbara von Orelli-Messerli
Formato: article
Lenguaje:PT
Publicado: Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/45d2a96abacb489e98621a74e67a08c8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:45d2a96abacb489e98621a74e67a08c8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:45d2a96abacb489e98621a74e67a08c82021-11-05T14:30:57ZThe Crisis of Ornament: Evaluation and Intercultural Divergences in the Visual Arts of the 19th and Early 20th Centuries10.5965/21752346122720200111984-95322175-2346https://doaj.org/article/45d2a96abacb489e98621a74e67a08c82020-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/palindromo/article/view/17290https://doaj.org/toc/1984-9532https://doaj.org/toc/2175-2346From the beginning of the 19th century up to the present, ornament has faced different crises because it is not an autonomous art but traditionally attached to a surface, be it architecture or applied arts. The fate of ornament has varied, according to leading theorists and critics in these fields. In 1812, Percier and Fontaine exhorted architects and artisans to use ornament with consciousness and care. Gottfried Semper could even conceive of applied arts without ornament, and his utmost concern was to show the original function of objects that they had lost over time. He wanted to clarify the purpose of an object, not only from a functional point of view, but also iconographically. Christopher Dresser, with a background as a biologist and ‘ornamentist’, was the first industrial designer to create objects without ornament, following the influence of Japanese art. The death knell apparently tolled for ornament in 1908 with Adolf Loos’ talk on Ornament and Crime. The subsequent opposition of Art Deco and Modernism was a clash of cultures, perceptible even nowadays among architects and art historians. At a certain point, as recent studies have pointed out, there was a merging of these two art movements. At present, ornament has made a comeback and been reintegrated into architecture in a new way and spirit.Barbara von Orelli-MesserliUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)articleornamentarchitectureapplied artsdesign19th centuryArt DecoArts in generalNX1-820Visual artsN1-9211PTPalíndromo, Vol 12, Iss 27 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language PT
topic ornament
architecture
applied arts
design
19th century
Art Deco
Arts in general
NX1-820
Visual arts
N1-9211
spellingShingle ornament
architecture
applied arts
design
19th century
Art Deco
Arts in general
NX1-820
Visual arts
N1-9211
Barbara von Orelli-Messerli
The Crisis of Ornament: Evaluation and Intercultural Divergences in the Visual Arts of the 19th and Early 20th Centuries
description From the beginning of the 19th century up to the present, ornament has faced different crises because it is not an autonomous art but traditionally attached to a surface, be it architecture or applied arts. The fate of ornament has varied, according to leading theorists and critics in these fields. In 1812, Percier and Fontaine exhorted architects and artisans to use ornament with consciousness and care. Gottfried Semper could even conceive of applied arts without ornament, and his utmost concern was to show the original function of objects that they had lost over time. He wanted to clarify the purpose of an object, not only from a functional point of view, but also iconographically. Christopher Dresser, with a background as a biologist and ‘ornamentist’, was the first industrial designer to create objects without ornament, following the influence of Japanese art. The death knell apparently tolled for ornament in 1908 with Adolf Loos’ talk on Ornament and Crime. The subsequent opposition of Art Deco and Modernism was a clash of cultures, perceptible even nowadays among architects and art historians. At a certain point, as recent studies have pointed out, there was a merging of these two art movements. At present, ornament has made a comeback and been reintegrated into architecture in a new way and spirit.
format article
author Barbara von Orelli-Messerli
author_facet Barbara von Orelli-Messerli
author_sort Barbara von Orelli-Messerli
title The Crisis of Ornament: Evaluation and Intercultural Divergences in the Visual Arts of the 19th and Early 20th Centuries
title_short The Crisis of Ornament: Evaluation and Intercultural Divergences in the Visual Arts of the 19th and Early 20th Centuries
title_full The Crisis of Ornament: Evaluation and Intercultural Divergences in the Visual Arts of the 19th and Early 20th Centuries
title_fullStr The Crisis of Ornament: Evaluation and Intercultural Divergences in the Visual Arts of the 19th and Early 20th Centuries
title_full_unstemmed The Crisis of Ornament: Evaluation and Intercultural Divergences in the Visual Arts of the 19th and Early 20th Centuries
title_sort crisis of ornament: evaluation and intercultural divergences in the visual arts of the 19th and early 20th centuries
publisher Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/45d2a96abacb489e98621a74e67a08c8
work_keys_str_mv AT barbaravonorellimesserli thecrisisofornamentevaluationandinterculturaldivergencesinthevisualartsofthe19thandearly20thcenturies
AT barbaravonorellimesserli crisisofornamentevaluationandinterculturaldivergencesinthevisualartsofthe19thandearly20thcenturies
_version_ 1718444223239290880