Confronting Challenges in Islamic Studies
At the 2016 meeting of the American Academy of Religion in San Antonio, the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) hosted the third annual Ismail al Faruqi Memorial Lecture. Delivered by Ahmad Atef Ahmad (University of California Santa Barbara), the lecture focused on the changing academ...
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Langue: | EN |
| Publié: |
International Institute of Islamic Thought
2017
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/45eed030fcce4a8bb47791ce4bdd9fdb |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| Résumé: | At the 2016 meeting of the American Academy of Religion in San Antonio,
the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) hosted the third annual
Ismail al Faruqi Memorial Lecture. Delivered by Ahmad Atef Ahmad (University
of California Santa Barbara), the lecture focused on the changing academic
field of Islamic studies: where the field has been, where it is now, and
where it should go in the future.
Ahmad began by outlining the history of approaching both Islamic studies
and comparative religion in general. After decades of claiming neutrality, he
believes that the field has now reached a new phase. “In the past there was an
assumption that there is a neutral, global set of rules and tools that can help us
understand religion, like those of philosophy or anthropology. However, over
time we have come to realize that these tools are in no way neutral and come
with their own kinds of baggage.” This failure of neutrality has particularly
affected scholars of Islam, because “You find that Muslim scholars who take
their primary sources seriously find the deck stacked against them, especially
for those who are working in the West and trying to engage in conversations
with other religious traditions.”
As a result of the realization that the tools of religious studies cannot be
neutral, academia has undergone a significant shift ...
|
|---|